Comparison of the recovery from isoflurane anesthesia with or without fentanyl infusion in patients undergoing elective supratentorial craniotomy.

Acta anaesthesiologica Sinica Pub Date : 2003-12-01
Hsin-Jung Tsai, Kuei-Feng Tsou, Hsu-Tang Liu, Chi-Chun Chu, Cheng-Ming Tsao, Mei-Yung Tsou, Shen-Kou Tsai
{"title":"Comparison of the recovery from isoflurane anesthesia with or without fentanyl infusion in patients undergoing elective supratentorial craniotomy.","authors":"Hsin-Jung Tsai,&nbsp;Kuei-Feng Tsou,&nbsp;Hsu-Tang Liu,&nbsp;Chi-Chun Chu,&nbsp;Cheng-Ming Tsao,&nbsp;Mei-Yung Tsou,&nbsp;Shen-Kou Tsai","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Several anesthetic agents have been used successfully to provide optimal anesthetic maintenance in neurosurgery for supratentorial tumors. Due to longer surgical time that these procedures demand and thoughout avoidance of intracranial bleeding from a hastened emergence of anesthesia in the operating room, the neurosurgeons in our hospital favor a placid late emergence from anesthesia in the neurosurgical intensive care unit (NCU). Accordingly, we designed this clinical trial to compare the effects of volatile general anesthesia with or without fentanyl infusion on postoperative hemodynamics, Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score, extubation time, as well as neurological outcome in patients after craniotomy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Forty-two patients undergoing elective surgery for supratentorial lesions were randomly divided into two anesthetic groups. In isoflurane group, after induction, anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane up to 1.2% end-tidal concentration. In fentanyl-isoflurane group, an infusion of fentanyl was started at a rate of 3 micrograms/kg/h after induction, and anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane up to 0.6% end-tidal concentration. All the anesthetics were discontinued once the surgical wound was dressed. We studied the postoperative hemodynamics and several recovery variables for 48 h after completion of anesthesia.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The time from completion of surgery to extubation was shorter in isoflurane group (9.3 +/- 6.6 h) as compared with fentanyl-isoflurane group (14 +/- 3.5 h, P < 0.05). Better GCS score was seen in isoflurane group in the early recovery period. However, both groups did not differ in both average postoperative blood pressure and heart rate and there was no significant difference between 2 groups in total duration of the postoperative NCU stay.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In pursuance of the policy of late emergence, we are of the opinion that isoflurane anesthesia offers an earlier recovery than fentanyl-isoflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy.</p>","PeriodicalId":79312,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Sinica","volume":"41 4","pages":"179-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Several anesthetic agents have been used successfully to provide optimal anesthetic maintenance in neurosurgery for supratentorial tumors. Due to longer surgical time that these procedures demand and thoughout avoidance of intracranial bleeding from a hastened emergence of anesthesia in the operating room, the neurosurgeons in our hospital favor a placid late emergence from anesthesia in the neurosurgical intensive care unit (NCU). Accordingly, we designed this clinical trial to compare the effects of volatile general anesthesia with or without fentanyl infusion on postoperative hemodynamics, Glasgow coma scale (GCS) score, extubation time, as well as neurological outcome in patients after craniotomy.

Methods: Forty-two patients undergoing elective surgery for supratentorial lesions were randomly divided into two anesthetic groups. In isoflurane group, after induction, anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane up to 1.2% end-tidal concentration. In fentanyl-isoflurane group, an infusion of fentanyl was started at a rate of 3 micrograms/kg/h after induction, and anesthesia was maintained with isoflurane up to 0.6% end-tidal concentration. All the anesthetics were discontinued once the surgical wound was dressed. We studied the postoperative hemodynamics and several recovery variables for 48 h after completion of anesthesia.

Results: The time from completion of surgery to extubation was shorter in isoflurane group (9.3 +/- 6.6 h) as compared with fentanyl-isoflurane group (14 +/- 3.5 h, P < 0.05). Better GCS score was seen in isoflurane group in the early recovery period. However, both groups did not differ in both average postoperative blood pressure and heart rate and there was no significant difference between 2 groups in total duration of the postoperative NCU stay.

Conclusions: In pursuance of the policy of late emergence, we are of the opinion that isoflurane anesthesia offers an earlier recovery than fentanyl-isoflurane anesthesia in patients undergoing supratentorial craniotomy.

选择性幕上开颅术患者在异氟醚麻醉下输注芬太尼或不输注芬太尼恢复的比较。
背景:在幕上肿瘤的神经外科手术中,已经成功地使用了几种麻醉剂来提供最佳的麻醉维持。由于这些手术需要较长的手术时间,并且在手术室中避免因麻醉加速出现颅内出血,因此我们医院的神经外科医生倾向于在神经外科重症监护病房(NCU)中平静地结束麻醉。因此,我们设计了本临床试验,比较挥发性全麻输注芬太尼或不输注芬太尼对开颅术后患者血流动力学、格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)、拔管时间以及神经系统预后的影响。方法:42例幕上病变择期手术患者随机分为两组。异氟醚组诱导后,以异氟醚维持麻醉至1.2%潮末浓度。芬太尼-异氟醚组诱导后以3微克/千克/小时的速率开始芬太尼输注,异氟醚维持麻醉至0.6%潮末浓度。手术伤口包扎完毕后,所有麻醉药均停止使用。我们研究了麻醉结束后48小时的术后血流动力学和几个恢复变量。结果:异氟醚组手术完成至拔管时间(9.3 +/- 6.6 h)短于芬太尼-异氟醚组(14 +/- 3.5 h, P < 0.05)。异氟醚组恢复期早期GCS评分较高。然而,两组术后平均血压和心率均无差异,两组术后NCU总住院时间无显著差异。结论:在晚出现的原则下,我们认为异氟醚麻醉比芬太尼-异氟醚麻醉对幕上开颅患者的恢复更早。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信