Out-of-pocket expenditures for oral contraceptives and number of packs per purchase.

Kathryn A Phillips, Naomi E Stotland, Su-Ying Liang, Joanne Spetz, Jennifer S Haas, Eyal Oren
{"title":"Out-of-pocket expenditures for oral contraceptives and number of packs per purchase.","authors":"Kathryn A Phillips,&nbsp;Naomi E Stotland,&nbsp;Su-Ying Liang,&nbsp;Joanne Spetz,&nbsp;Jennifer S Haas,&nbsp;Eyal Oren","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Two potential barriers to use of oral contraceptives (OCPs) are out-of-pocket expenditures and the inconvenience of monthly pharmacy visits. This study used nationally representative data to examine the out-of-pocket costs of OCPs and whether women obtain more than 1 pack per purchase.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We used data from the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Dependent variables were out-of-pocket expenditures per pack and the number of packs obtained per purchase. Chi2 tests were used to examine the bivariate relationships between the dependent variables and covariates. Regression analyses were used to examine the predictors of OCP expenditures and the number of packs obtained per purchase.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women paid an average of 14 dollars per pack of OCPs, and 73% obtained only 1 pack per purchase. On average, privately insured women paid 60% of the total expenditures for OCPs. Women who had no prescription drug coverage, who were uninsured, or who were privately insured but not in managed care plans had higher out-of-pocket expenditures. Women who were without prescription drug coverage or who were in managed care plans were more likely to obtain only 1 pack per purchase.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Out-of-pocket costs and dispensing restrictions may be barriers to consistent use of OCPs. Women's health care providers should consider options to overcome these barriers, such as the use of mail order prescription services.</p>","PeriodicalId":76028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Women's Association (1972)","volume":"59 1","pages":"36-42"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2004-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Women's Association (1972)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Two potential barriers to use of oral contraceptives (OCPs) are out-of-pocket expenditures and the inconvenience of monthly pharmacy visits. This study used nationally representative data to examine the out-of-pocket costs of OCPs and whether women obtain more than 1 pack per purchase.

Methods: We used data from the 1996 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. Dependent variables were out-of-pocket expenditures per pack and the number of packs obtained per purchase. Chi2 tests were used to examine the bivariate relationships between the dependent variables and covariates. Regression analyses were used to examine the predictors of OCP expenditures and the number of packs obtained per purchase.

Results: Women paid an average of 14 dollars per pack of OCPs, and 73% obtained only 1 pack per purchase. On average, privately insured women paid 60% of the total expenditures for OCPs. Women who had no prescription drug coverage, who were uninsured, or who were privately insured but not in managed care plans had higher out-of-pocket expenditures. Women who were without prescription drug coverage or who were in managed care plans were more likely to obtain only 1 pack per purchase.

Conclusion: Out-of-pocket costs and dispensing restrictions may be barriers to consistent use of OCPs. Women's health care providers should consider options to overcome these barriers, such as the use of mail order prescription services.

口服避孕药的自付费用和每次购买的包数。
目的:使用口服避孕药(ocp)的两个潜在障碍是自付费用和每月去药房就诊的不便。本研究使用具有全国代表性的数据来检查ocp的自付费用,以及女性每次购买是否获得超过一包。方法:采用1996年医疗费用调查资料。因变量是每个包的自付支出和每次购买获得的包数。采用Chi2检验检验因变量和协变量之间的双变量关系。回归分析用于检查OCP支出的预测因子和每次购买获得的包数。结果:女性平均每包ocp支付14美元,73%的人每次购买只获得1包。平均而言,私人保险的妇女支付了ocp总支出的60%。没有处方药保险的妇女,没有保险的妇女,或者有私人保险但没有参加管理医疗计划的妇女,自付费用更高。没有处方药保险或参加管理医疗计划的妇女更有可能每次购买只获得一包。结论:自付费用和配药限制可能是持续使用ocp的障碍。妇女保健提供者应考虑克服这些障碍的各种办法,例如使用邮购处方服务。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信