NIH state-of-the-science statement on management of the clinically inapparent adrenal mass ("incidentaloma").

{"title":"NIH state-of-the-science statement on management of the clinically inapparent adrenal mass (\"incidentaloma\").","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To provide health care providers, patients, and the general public with a responsible assessment of currently available data regarding the management of clinically inapparent adrenal masses (\"incidentalomas\").</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>A non-Federal, nonadvocate, 12-member panel representing the fields of medicine, surgery, endocrinology, pathology, biostatistics, epidemiology, radiology, oncology, and the public. In addition, experts in these same fields presented data to the panel and to a conference audience of approximately 300.</p><p><strong>Evidence: </strong>Presentations by experts; a systematic review of the medical literature provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; and an extensive bibliography of incidentaloma research papers, prepared by the National Library of Medicine. Scientific evidence was given precedence over clinical anecdotal experience.</p><p><strong>Conference process: </strong>Answering predefined questions, the panel drafted a statement based on the scientific evidence presented in open forum and the scientific literature. The draft statement was read in its entirety on the final day of the conference and circulated to the experts and the audience for comment. The panel then met in executive session to consider these comments and released a revised statement at the end of the conference. The statement was made available on the World Wide Web at http://consensus.nih.gov immediately after the conference. This statement is an independent report of the panel and is not a policy statement of the NIH or the Federal Government.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The management of clinically inapparent adrenal masses is complicated by limited studies of incidence, prevalence, and natural history, including the psychologic impact on the patient who is informed of the diagnosis. Improvements in the resolution of abdominal imaging techniques combined with increased use of abdominal imaging suggest that the prevalence of clinically inapparent adrenal masses will continue to escalate. The low prevalence of adrenal cortical carcinomas and the relatively low incidence of progression to hyperfunction call into question the advisability of the current practice of intense, long-term clinical followup of this common condition. All patients with an incidentaloma should have a 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test and a measurement of plasma-free metanephrines. Patients with hypertension should also undergo measurement of serum potassium and plasma aldosterone concentration/plasma renin activity ratio. A homogeneous mass with a low attenuation value (less than 10 HU) on CT scan is likely a benign adenoma. Surgery should be considered in all patients with functional adrenal cortical tumors that are clinically apparent. All patients with biochemical evidence of pheochromocytoma should undergo surgery. Data are insufficient to indicate the superiority of a surgical or nonsurgical approach to manage patients with subclinical hyperfunctioning adrenal cortical adenomas. Recommendations for surgery based upon tumor size are derived from studies not standardized for inclusion criteria, length of followup, or methods of estimating the risk of carcinoma. Nevertheless, patients with tumors greater than 6 cm usually are treated surgically, while those with tumors less than 4 cm are generally monitored. In patients with tumors between 4 and 6 cm, criteria in addition to size should be considered in making the decision to monitor or proceed to adrenalectomy. The literature on adrenal incidentaloma has proliferated in the last several years. Unfortunately, the lack of controlled studies makes formulating diagnostic and treatment strategies difficult. Because of the complexity of the problem, the management of patients with adrenal incidentalomas will be optimized by a multidisciplinary team approach involving physicians with expertise in endocrinology, radiology, surgery, and pathology. The paucity of evidence-based data highlights the need for well-designed prospective studies. Either open or laparoscopic adrenalectomy is an acceptable procedure for resection of an adrenal mass. The choice of procedure will depend upon the likelihood of an invasive adrenal cortical carcinoma, technical issues, and the experience of the surgical team. In patients with tumors that remain stable on two imaging studies carried out at least 6 months apart and do not exhibit hormonal hypersecretion over 4 years, further followup may not be warranted.</p>","PeriodicalId":86986,"journal":{"name":"NIH consensus and state-of-the-science statements","volume":"19 2","pages":"1-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-02-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIH consensus and state-of-the-science statements","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To provide health care providers, patients, and the general public with a responsible assessment of currently available data regarding the management of clinically inapparent adrenal masses ("incidentalomas").

Participants: A non-Federal, nonadvocate, 12-member panel representing the fields of medicine, surgery, endocrinology, pathology, biostatistics, epidemiology, radiology, oncology, and the public. In addition, experts in these same fields presented data to the panel and to a conference audience of approximately 300.

Evidence: Presentations by experts; a systematic review of the medical literature provided by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality; and an extensive bibliography of incidentaloma research papers, prepared by the National Library of Medicine. Scientific evidence was given precedence over clinical anecdotal experience.

Conference process: Answering predefined questions, the panel drafted a statement based on the scientific evidence presented in open forum and the scientific literature. The draft statement was read in its entirety on the final day of the conference and circulated to the experts and the audience for comment. The panel then met in executive session to consider these comments and released a revised statement at the end of the conference. The statement was made available on the World Wide Web at http://consensus.nih.gov immediately after the conference. This statement is an independent report of the panel and is not a policy statement of the NIH or the Federal Government.

Conclusions: The management of clinically inapparent adrenal masses is complicated by limited studies of incidence, prevalence, and natural history, including the psychologic impact on the patient who is informed of the diagnosis. Improvements in the resolution of abdominal imaging techniques combined with increased use of abdominal imaging suggest that the prevalence of clinically inapparent adrenal masses will continue to escalate. The low prevalence of adrenal cortical carcinomas and the relatively low incidence of progression to hyperfunction call into question the advisability of the current practice of intense, long-term clinical followup of this common condition. All patients with an incidentaloma should have a 1-mg dexamethasone suppression test and a measurement of plasma-free metanephrines. Patients with hypertension should also undergo measurement of serum potassium and plasma aldosterone concentration/plasma renin activity ratio. A homogeneous mass with a low attenuation value (less than 10 HU) on CT scan is likely a benign adenoma. Surgery should be considered in all patients with functional adrenal cortical tumors that are clinically apparent. All patients with biochemical evidence of pheochromocytoma should undergo surgery. Data are insufficient to indicate the superiority of a surgical or nonsurgical approach to manage patients with subclinical hyperfunctioning adrenal cortical adenomas. Recommendations for surgery based upon tumor size are derived from studies not standardized for inclusion criteria, length of followup, or methods of estimating the risk of carcinoma. Nevertheless, patients with tumors greater than 6 cm usually are treated surgically, while those with tumors less than 4 cm are generally monitored. In patients with tumors between 4 and 6 cm, criteria in addition to size should be considered in making the decision to monitor or proceed to adrenalectomy. The literature on adrenal incidentaloma has proliferated in the last several years. Unfortunately, the lack of controlled studies makes formulating diagnostic and treatment strategies difficult. Because of the complexity of the problem, the management of patients with adrenal incidentalomas will be optimized by a multidisciplinary team approach involving physicians with expertise in endocrinology, radiology, surgery, and pathology. The paucity of evidence-based data highlights the need for well-designed prospective studies. Either open or laparoscopic adrenalectomy is an acceptable procedure for resection of an adrenal mass. The choice of procedure will depend upon the likelihood of an invasive adrenal cortical carcinoma, technical issues, and the experience of the surgical team. In patients with tumors that remain stable on two imaging studies carried out at least 6 months apart and do not exhibit hormonal hypersecretion over 4 years, further followup may not be warranted.

美国国立卫生研究院关于临床不明显肾上腺肿块(“偶发瘤”)管理的最新科学声明。
目的:为医疗保健提供者、患者和公众提供有关临床不明显肾上腺肿块(“偶发瘤”)管理的现有数据的负责任评估。参与者:一个非联邦、非倡导者、由12名成员组成的小组,代表医学、外科学、内分泌学、病理学、生物统计学、流行病学、放射学、肿瘤学和公众等领域。此外,这些领域的专家还向小组和大约300名会议听众介绍了数据。证据:专家陈述;由卫生保健研究和质量机构提供的医学文献系统综述;以及由国家医学图书馆准备的关于偶发瘤研究论文的广泛参考书目。科学证据优先于临床轶事经验。会议过程:回答预先确定的问题,小组根据公开论坛和科学文献提出的科学证据起草了一份声明。声明草案全文在会议的最后一天宣读,并分发给专家和听众征求意见。该小组随后在执行会议上开会审议这些意见,并在会议结束时发布了一份修订后的声明。会议结束后,该声明立即在万维网http://consensus.nih.gov上公布。本声明是专家组的独立报告,不是NIH或联邦政府的政策声明。结论:临床上不明显的肾上腺肿物的治疗因其发病率、患病率和自然史的研究有限而变得复杂,包括对被告知诊断的患者的心理影响。腹部成像技术分辨率的提高和腹部成像使用的增加表明临床上不明显的肾上腺肿块的患病率将继续上升。肾上腺皮质癌的低患病率和发展为功能亢进的相对较低的发生率使人们对目前对这种常见疾病进行高强度、长期临床随访的可行性提出了质疑。所有偶发瘤患者均应进行1mg地塞米松抑制试验和血浆游离肾上腺素测定。高血压患者还应测定血清钾和血浆醛固酮浓度/血浆肾素活性比。CT扫描呈低衰减值(小于10 HU)的均匀肿块可能为良性腺瘤。所有临床表现明显的功能性肾上腺皮质肿瘤患者均应考虑手术治疗。所有有生化证据的嗜铬细胞瘤患者都应接受手术。数据不足以表明手术或非手术方法治疗亚临床功能亢进的肾上腺皮质腺瘤的优势。基于肿瘤大小的手术建议来源于未标准化纳入标准、随访时间或评估癌风险方法的研究。然而,肿瘤大于6cm的患者通常采用手术治疗,而小于4cm的患者通常进行监测。对于肿瘤在4 - 6cm之间的患者,在决定是否进行监测或进行肾上腺切除术时,除了肿瘤大小外,还应考虑其他标准。在过去的几年里,关于肾上腺偶发瘤的文献越来越多。不幸的是,缺乏对照研究使得制定诊断和治疗策略变得困难。由于问题的复杂性,肾上腺偶发瘤患者的管理将通过涉及内分泌学、放射学、外科和病理学专家的多学科团队方法来优化。基于证据的数据的缺乏凸显了设计良好的前瞻性研究的必要性。开放或腹腔镜肾上腺切除术是切除肾上腺肿块的一种可接受的方法。手术的选择将取决于浸润性肾上腺皮质癌的可能性、技术问题和手术团队的经验。在间隔至少6个月的两次影像学检查中肿瘤保持稳定且在4年内未出现激素分泌过多的患者,可能不需要进一步随访。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信