A randomized, controlled, crossover trial of oral midazolam and hydroxyzine for pediatric dental sedation.

Q2 Dentistry
Alessandra Rodrigues de Almeida Lima, Luciane Ribeiro de Rezende Sucasas da Costa, Paulo Sérgio Sucasas da Costa
{"title":"A randomized, controlled, crossover trial of oral midazolam and hydroxyzine for pediatric dental sedation.","authors":"Alessandra Rodrigues de Almeida Lima,&nbsp;Luciane Ribeiro de Rezende Sucasas da Costa,&nbsp;Paulo Sérgio Sucasas da Costa","doi":"10.1590/s1517-74912003000300002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The effectiveness of oral midazolam in pediatric dentistry is controversial. This randomized, controlled, crossover, double blind clinical trial was conducted in order to study the effect of midazolam, used either alone or in association with hydroxyzine, during child dental treatment. Thirty seven dental sedation sessions were carried out on 11 ASA I uncooperative children less than five years-old. In each appointment children were randomly assigned to groups: P - placebo, M - midazolam (1.0 mg/kg), or MH - midazolam (0.75 mg/kg) plus hydroxyzine (2.0 mg/kg). Vital signs (blood pressure, breathing rate, pulse and oxygen saturation) and behavior parameters (consciousness, crying, movement, overall behavior) were evaluated every 15 minutes. Friedman and Wilcoxon statistical tests were used to compare groups and different moments in the same group. Normal values of vital signs were usually registered. Heart rate increased in groups P and M as the session went on. Group M presented less crying and movement at the first 15 minutes of treatment. Group MH caused more drowsiness at the beginning of the session. Overall behavior was better in group M than in groups P or MH. Group M produced effective sedation in 77% of the cases, and group MH did so in 30.8%. It was concluded that midazolam was effective and safe, and its association with hydroxyzine did not lead to additional advantages in pediatric dental sedation.</p>","PeriodicalId":35295,"journal":{"name":"Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research","volume":"17 3","pages":"206-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1590/s1517-74912003000300002","citationCount":"62","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pesquisa odontologica brasileira = Brazilian oral research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/s1517-74912003000300002","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2003/12/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Dentistry","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 62

Abstract

The effectiveness of oral midazolam in pediatric dentistry is controversial. This randomized, controlled, crossover, double blind clinical trial was conducted in order to study the effect of midazolam, used either alone or in association with hydroxyzine, during child dental treatment. Thirty seven dental sedation sessions were carried out on 11 ASA I uncooperative children less than five years-old. In each appointment children were randomly assigned to groups: P - placebo, M - midazolam (1.0 mg/kg), or MH - midazolam (0.75 mg/kg) plus hydroxyzine (2.0 mg/kg). Vital signs (blood pressure, breathing rate, pulse and oxygen saturation) and behavior parameters (consciousness, crying, movement, overall behavior) were evaluated every 15 minutes. Friedman and Wilcoxon statistical tests were used to compare groups and different moments in the same group. Normal values of vital signs were usually registered. Heart rate increased in groups P and M as the session went on. Group M presented less crying and movement at the first 15 minutes of treatment. Group MH caused more drowsiness at the beginning of the session. Overall behavior was better in group M than in groups P or MH. Group M produced effective sedation in 77% of the cases, and group MH did so in 30.8%. It was concluded that midazolam was effective and safe, and its association with hydroxyzine did not lead to additional advantages in pediatric dental sedation.

一项口服咪达唑仑和羟嗪用于小儿牙科镇静的随机、对照、交叉试验。
口服咪达唑仑在儿科牙科的有效性是有争议的。这项随机、对照、交叉、双盲临床试验是为了研究咪达唑仑在儿童牙科治疗期间单独使用或与羟嗪联合使用的效果。对11例5岁以下ASA I不合作儿童进行了37次牙科镇静治疗。在每次预约中,儿童被随机分配到组:P -安慰剂,M -咪达唑仑(1.0 mg/kg),或MH -咪达唑仑(0.75 mg/kg)加羟嗪(2.0 mg/kg)。每15分钟评估一次生命体征(血压、呼吸频率、脉搏和血氧饱和度)和行为参数(意识、哭泣、运动、整体行为)。采用Friedman和Wilcoxon统计检验比较各组和同一组的不同时刻。通常记录生命体征正常值。P组和M组的心率随着训练的进行而增加。M组患儿在治疗前15分钟哭闹和活动较少。MH组在会议开始时引起更多的困倦。M组的整体行为优于P组或MH组。M组77%的病例产生有效镇静,MH组30.8%的病例产生有效镇静。结论是咪达唑仑是有效和安全的,它与羟嗪的联用并没有在小儿牙科镇静中带来额外的优势。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Pesquisa Odontológica Brasileira is a new quarterly published journal (January-March, April-June, July-September, October-December), with an annual supplement (Anais da Reunião de Pesquisa Odontológica da SBPqO), by the Sociedade Brasileira de Pesquisa Odontológica [Brazilian Society of Odontological Research] and University of São Paulo. It replaces Revista de Odontologia da Universidade de São Paulo (ISSN 0103-0663).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信