Urban-rural differences in self-reported limiting long-term illness in Scotland.

Kate A Levin
{"title":"Urban-rural differences in self-reported limiting long-term illness in Scotland.","authors":"Kate A Levin","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdg084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Previous research suggests that there are significant differences in health between urban and rural areas. The aim of this study is to describe the pattern and magnitude of urban-rural variation in health in Scotland and to examine the factors associated with health inequalities in urban and rural areas.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The data used in this study were limiting long-term illness (LLTI) and socio-economic data collected by the 1991 Census. A rurality indicator was created using Scottish Household Survey rurality classifications. Multilevel Poisson regression modelling was carried out with LLTI as a health indicator for each type of rurality within Scotland. A variety of socio-economic factors were investigated for each rurality.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Areas with the highest Standardized Illness Ratios (SIRs) (>125) are predominantly urban whereas the lowest SIRs (<75) are found in both urban and rural areas. Rural communities are more heterogeneous than urban areas in terms of their social make-up with relation to health; however, when these areas are split according to minor road length and different socio-economic factors are added, the model fit for each new model is improved and the reduction in total variation is comparable with that of the urban models.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that rural areas should not be treated as a homogeneous group but should be subdivided into rural types.</p>","PeriodicalId":77224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health medicine","volume":"25 4","pages":"295-302"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/fdg084","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdg084","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Background: Previous research suggests that there are significant differences in health between urban and rural areas. The aim of this study is to describe the pattern and magnitude of urban-rural variation in health in Scotland and to examine the factors associated with health inequalities in urban and rural areas.

Methods: The data used in this study were limiting long-term illness (LLTI) and socio-economic data collected by the 1991 Census. A rurality indicator was created using Scottish Household Survey rurality classifications. Multilevel Poisson regression modelling was carried out with LLTI as a health indicator for each type of rurality within Scotland. A variety of socio-economic factors were investigated for each rurality.

Results: Areas with the highest Standardized Illness Ratios (SIRs) (>125) are predominantly urban whereas the lowest SIRs (<75) are found in both urban and rural areas. Rural communities are more heterogeneous than urban areas in terms of their social make-up with relation to health; however, when these areas are split according to minor road length and different socio-economic factors are added, the model fit for each new model is improved and the reduction in total variation is comparable with that of the urban models.

Conclusion: These findings suggest that rural areas should not be treated as a homogeneous group but should be subdivided into rural types.

苏格兰自我报告限制长期疾病的城乡差异。
背景:以往的研究表明,城市和农村地区的健康状况存在显著差异。这项研究的目的是描述苏格兰城乡健康差异的模式和程度,并研究与城乡健康不平等有关的因素。方法:本研究使用的数据是1991年人口普查收集的限制长期疾病(LLTI)和社会经济数据。利用苏格兰家庭调查的农村分类,创建了一个农村指标。采用多水平泊松回归模型,将LLTI作为苏格兰各类型乡村的健康指标。对每个农村的各种社会经济因素进行了调查。结果:标准化疾病比(SIRs)最高的地区(>125)主要是城市,而SIRs最低的地区(结论:这些发现表明,农村地区不应被视为一个同质群体,而应细分为农村类型。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信