Screening for colorectal cancer: medical and economic aspects.

S Sanduleanu, R W Stockbrügger
{"title":"Screening for colorectal cancer: medical and economic aspects.","authors":"S Sanduleanu,&nbsp;R W Stockbrügger","doi":"10.1080/00855920310002735","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second commonest cause of cancer death in the Western world. In The Netherlands, CRC causes about 4400 deaths per year, and its diagnosis and treatment make up for a large share of health-care costs.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Review and discussioN.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Experts in the field presently assume that screening for CRC and its precursor lesions, colorectal adenomas (CRAs), could prevent death from colorectal neoplasia by more than 80%. Additionally, there is increasing acknowledgement that CRC screening programmes can save lives at a cost similar to, or even less than, the generally accepted breast cancer or cervical cancer screening programmes. Nonetheless, while neighbouring countries have taken vigorous measures to fight CRC, the Dutch are still hesitating in this matter. This is partly due to some yet unanswered questions concerning the acceptability of screening for CRC in the general population, the starting age and the frequency of screening, the type of screening tests to be used, and the programme organization. In this commentary, general epidemiological and pathogenetic aspects of CRC are addressed. In addition, some frequently asked questions (FAQ) and (very subjective) answers about screening for CRC are offered, as potential substrate for further in-depth discussions.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The emerging message for the community is that an effective national screening programme is urgently required to reduce the substantial morbidity and mortality from this disease.</p>","PeriodicalId":21517,"journal":{"name":"Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. Supplement","volume":" 239","pages":"73-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Scandinavian journal of gastroenterology. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00855920310002735","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Background: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second commonest cause of cancer death in the Western world. In The Netherlands, CRC causes about 4400 deaths per year, and its diagnosis and treatment make up for a large share of health-care costs.

Methods: Review and discussioN.

Results: Experts in the field presently assume that screening for CRC and its precursor lesions, colorectal adenomas (CRAs), could prevent death from colorectal neoplasia by more than 80%. Additionally, there is increasing acknowledgement that CRC screening programmes can save lives at a cost similar to, or even less than, the generally accepted breast cancer or cervical cancer screening programmes. Nonetheless, while neighbouring countries have taken vigorous measures to fight CRC, the Dutch are still hesitating in this matter. This is partly due to some yet unanswered questions concerning the acceptability of screening for CRC in the general population, the starting age and the frequency of screening, the type of screening tests to be used, and the programme organization. In this commentary, general epidemiological and pathogenetic aspects of CRC are addressed. In addition, some frequently asked questions (FAQ) and (very subjective) answers about screening for CRC are offered, as potential substrate for further in-depth discussions.

Conclusion: The emerging message for the community is that an effective national screening programme is urgently required to reduce the substantial morbidity and mortality from this disease.

结直肠癌筛查:医学和经济方面。
背景:结直肠癌(CRC)是西方世界癌症死亡的第二大常见原因。在荷兰,结直肠癌每年造成约4400人死亡,其诊断和治疗占保健费用的很大一部分。方法:复习讨论。结果:目前该领域的专家认为,筛查结直肠癌及其前体病变,结直肠腺瘤(CRAs),可以防止80%以上的结直肠肿瘤死亡。此外,越来越多的人认识到,CRC筛查计划可以挽救生命,其成本与普遍接受的乳腺癌或子宫颈癌筛查计划相似,甚至更低。然而,虽然邻国已采取有力措施与儿童权利公约作斗争,但荷兰在这个问题上仍然犹豫不决。这部分是由于一些尚未解决的问题,如一般人群对CRC筛查的可接受性、筛查的起始年龄和频率、使用的筛查试验类型以及规划组织。在这篇评论,一般流行病学和病理方面的CRC是解决。此外,还提供了一些关于CRC筛查的常见问题(FAQ)和(非常主观的)答案,作为进一步深入讨论的潜在基础。结论:对社区的新信息是,迫切需要一个有效的国家筛查计划,以减少这种疾病的大量发病率和死亡率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信