Pilot evaluation of a convenient and cost-effective method of patch testing.

Erin Warshaw, An Liu, Kelly Jerstad, Gina Lee, Kathleen Larson, April Farrell, Jacqueline Bailey, Dave Nelson
{"title":"Pilot evaluation of a convenient and cost-effective method of patch testing.","authors":"Erin Warshaw,&nbsp;An Liu,&nbsp;Kelly Jerstad,&nbsp;Gina Lee,&nbsp;Kathleen Larson,&nbsp;April Farrell,&nbsp;Jacqueline Bailey,&nbsp;Dave Nelson","doi":"10.2310/6620.2003.38748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The primary objective of this double-blind randomized, pilot study was to evaluate whether previously prepared stored patches may be as effective as freshly prepared patches are for detecting contact allergy.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two sets of 62 nonaqueous allergens were applied to participants' upper backs. One set was freshly prepared, and the second set was previously prepared and stored for an average of 6 weeks. Right or left back location for each set was randomly assigned. The primary outcome assessment compared the proportions of fresh and strong reactions in pairs with complete discordance (negative on one side and 1+, 2+, or 3+ on the other side).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In 71 patients enrolled, there were 169 positive reactions. Concordance (any combination of a 1+, 2+, or 3+ reaction on both sides) was found in 63% of pairs (95% CI: 55.4, 70.0). Of the 25 pairs with complete discordance, there was no statistically significant difference between the rate of positive reactions for fresh and stored patches.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Pilot evidence suggests that stored patches may be effective in detecting the majority of allergic contact reactions. Larger studies are needed to evaluate antigen-specific effects as well as effects of varying lengths of antigen storage.</p>","PeriodicalId":7612,"journal":{"name":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","volume":"14 1","pages":"15-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2310/6620.2003.38748","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Objective: The primary objective of this double-blind randomized, pilot study was to evaluate whether previously prepared stored patches may be as effective as freshly prepared patches are for detecting contact allergy.

Methods: Two sets of 62 nonaqueous allergens were applied to participants' upper backs. One set was freshly prepared, and the second set was previously prepared and stored for an average of 6 weeks. Right or left back location for each set was randomly assigned. The primary outcome assessment compared the proportions of fresh and strong reactions in pairs with complete discordance (negative on one side and 1+, 2+, or 3+ on the other side).

Results: In 71 patients enrolled, there were 169 positive reactions. Concordance (any combination of a 1+, 2+, or 3+ reaction on both sides) was found in 63% of pairs (95% CI: 55.4, 70.0). Of the 25 pairs with complete discordance, there was no statistically significant difference between the rate of positive reactions for fresh and stored patches.

Conclusion: Pilot evidence suggests that stored patches may be effective in detecting the majority of allergic contact reactions. Larger studies are needed to evaluate antigen-specific effects as well as effects of varying lengths of antigen storage.

试点评估一种方便和具有成本效益的贴片测试方法。
目的:这项双盲、随机、初步研究的主要目的是评估预先准备的储存贴片是否与新准备的贴片一样有效,以检测接触性过敏。方法:将两组62种非水致敏原应用于受试者的上背部。一组是新鲜制备的,第二组是之前制备的,平均保存6周。每组的右后卫或左后卫位置是随机分配的。主要结果评估比较了完全不一致的新鲜反应和强烈反应的比例(一侧为阴性,另一侧为1+,2+或3+)。结果:71例患者中,阳性反应169例。在63%的配对中发现了一致性(双方1+、2+或3+反应的任何组合)(95% CI: 55.4, 70.0)。在25对完全不一致的贴片中,新鲜贴片和储存贴片的阳性反应率之间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:初步证据表明,储存贴片可有效检测大多数过敏接触反应。需要更大规模的研究来评估抗原特异性效应以及不同抗原储存长度的效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信