Shoe contact dermatitis in Israel.

Akiva Trattner, Yoshef Farchi, Michael David
{"title":"Shoe contact dermatitis in Israel.","authors":"Akiva Trattner,&nbsp;Yoshef Farchi,&nbsp;Michael David","doi":"10.2310/6620.2003.38745","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patch testing with the shoe series may be useful for the diagnosis of shoe contact dermatitis.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to verify the usefulness of the shoe series and the association of fungal infection with positive results in the shoe series.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 140 patients with suspected shoe contact dermatitis underwent patch testing with the standard series and shoe series; 41 underwent mycologic examination.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Positive results in the shoe series were noted in 58 patients (41.4%). The most common allergens were potassium dichromate (27.2%), nickel sulfate (11.9%), Kathon CG (10.9%), and 4-tert-butylphenol formaldehyde resin (8.7%). Of the 41 patients with suspected tinea pedis, 13 (32%) had positive mycologic findings and 9 (69.2%) also had a positive response to the shoe series. Of the patients with a negative result on mycologic examination, only 10 (35.7%) had a positive result in the shoe series.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our study indicates that all patients with foot dermatitis should undergo patch testing with the shoe series. Positive results in the shoe series seem to be more prevalent in patients with a fungal infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":7612,"journal":{"name":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","volume":"14 1","pages":"12-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of contact dermatitis : official journal of the American Contact Dermatitis Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2310/6620.2003.38745","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

Background: Patch testing with the shoe series may be useful for the diagnosis of shoe contact dermatitis.

Objective: The aim of the study was to verify the usefulness of the shoe series and the association of fungal infection with positive results in the shoe series.

Methods: A total of 140 patients with suspected shoe contact dermatitis underwent patch testing with the standard series and shoe series; 41 underwent mycologic examination.

Results: Positive results in the shoe series were noted in 58 patients (41.4%). The most common allergens were potassium dichromate (27.2%), nickel sulfate (11.9%), Kathon CG (10.9%), and 4-tert-butylphenol formaldehyde resin (8.7%). Of the 41 patients with suspected tinea pedis, 13 (32%) had positive mycologic findings and 9 (69.2%) also had a positive response to the shoe series. Of the patients with a negative result on mycologic examination, only 10 (35.7%) had a positive result in the shoe series.

Conclusion: Our study indicates that all patients with foot dermatitis should undergo patch testing with the shoe series. Positive results in the shoe series seem to be more prevalent in patients with a fungal infection.

以色列的鞋子接触性皮炎。
背景:鞋系列的斑贴试验可能有助于诊断鞋接触性皮炎。目的:本研究的目的是验证鞋系列的有效性和真菌感染与鞋系列阳性结果的关联。方法:对140例疑似鞋接触性皮炎患者采用标准系列和鞋系列进行斑贴试验;41例接受真菌学检查。结果:58例(41.4%)患者鞋系阳性。最常见的过敏原是重铬酸钾(27.2%)、硫酸镍(11.9%)、卡松CG(10.9%)和4-叔丁基酚甲醛树脂(8.7%)。在41例疑似足癣患者中,13例(32%)有真菌学阳性发现,9例(69.2%)对该鞋系列也有阳性反应。在真菌学检查结果阴性的患者中,只有10例(35.7%)鞋系检查结果阳性。结论:本研究提示所有足部皮炎患者均应使用该系列鞋进行斑贴试验。鞋系列的阳性结果似乎在真菌感染的患者中更为普遍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信