Validation of a feature-based likelihood ratio method for the SAILR software. Part II: Elemental compositional data for comparison of glass samples

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL
Jonas Malmborg , Anders Nordgaard
{"title":"Validation of a feature-based likelihood ratio method for the SAILR software. Part II: Elemental compositional data for comparison of glass samples","authors":"Jonas Malmborg ,&nbsp;Anders Nordgaard","doi":"10.1016/j.forc.2021.100385","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>SAILR is open-source software designed to calculate forensic likelihood ratios (LR) from probability distributions of reference data. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate validation of a multivariate feature-based LR method for SAILR using compositional data on glass fragments. Validation was performed using designated performance characteristics, e.g., accuracy, discrimination, and calibration. These characteristics were measured using performance metrics such as cost of the log likelihood ratio and equal error rate. The LR method was developed simultaneously to a baseline method having features less discriminating, but being better aligned with the normality assumption for within-source variation. The baseline method served as the floor of acceptable performance. The results showed that the available data supported LR methods using three elemental features or less. Best performance was obtained using calcium, magnesium, and silicon. The within-source variation in elemental features was slightly leptokurtic (heavy-tailed), violating the assumption of normality. The data were therefore normalized using Lambert W transformation and the performance of the LR method using normalized data was compared with that using non-normalized data. Although performance improved with normalization, the difference was small. Limits of LR output were set to 1/512 ≤ LR ≤ 158 using the empirical lower and upper boundaries (ELUB) LR method. This limited range was primarily a consequence of notable within-source variation. By passing the tests of normality and outperforming the baseline method, the method was considered valid for use in SAILR for data relevant to the background data set, using the defined range of LRs.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":324,"journal":{"name":"Forensic Chemistry","volume":"27 ","pages":"Article 100385"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forensic Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2468170921000813","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

SAILR is open-source software designed to calculate forensic likelihood ratios (LR) from probability distributions of reference data. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate validation of a multivariate feature-based LR method for SAILR using compositional data on glass fragments. Validation was performed using designated performance characteristics, e.g., accuracy, discrimination, and calibration. These characteristics were measured using performance metrics such as cost of the log likelihood ratio and equal error rate. The LR method was developed simultaneously to a baseline method having features less discriminating, but being better aligned with the normality assumption for within-source variation. The baseline method served as the floor of acceptable performance. The results showed that the available data supported LR methods using three elemental features or less. Best performance was obtained using calcium, magnesium, and silicon. The within-source variation in elemental features was slightly leptokurtic (heavy-tailed), violating the assumption of normality. The data were therefore normalized using Lambert W transformation and the performance of the LR method using normalized data was compared with that using non-normalized data. Although performance improved with normalization, the difference was small. Limits of LR output were set to 1/512 ≤ LR ≤ 158 using the empirical lower and upper boundaries (ELUB) LR method. This limited range was primarily a consequence of notable within-source variation. By passing the tests of normality and outperforming the baseline method, the method was considered valid for use in SAILR for data relevant to the background data set, using the defined range of LRs.

Abstract Image

SAILR软件基于特征的似然比方法的验证。第二部分:玻璃样品比较的元素成分数据
SAILR是一个开源软件,用于根据参考数据的概率分布计算取证似然比(LR)。本研究的目的是利用玻璃碎片的成分数据,验证基于多变量特征的LR方法对SAILR的有效性。使用指定的性能特征进行验证,例如,准确性、鉴别和校准。使用诸如对数似然比成本和等错误率等性能指标来测量这些特征。LR方法同时发展为基线方法,其特征不那么区分,但更好地符合源内变化的正态性假设。基线方法是可接受性能的下限。结果表明,现有数据支持使用三个或更少元素特征的LR方法。使用钙、镁和硅获得最佳性能。元素特征的源内变化略有细峰(重尾),违反正态性假设。因此,使用Lambert W变换对数据进行归一化,并比较了使用归一化数据的LR方法与使用非归一化数据的LR方法的性能。虽然性能随着规范化而提高,但差异很小。采用经验上下边界(ELUB) LR法设定LR输出限为1/512 ≤ LR ≤ 158。这种有限的范围主要是由于显著的源内变化。通过正态性测试并优于基线方法,该方法被认为可以在SAILR中使用与背景数据集相关的数据,使用定义的LRs范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Forensic Chemistry
Forensic Chemistry CHEMISTRY, ANALYTICAL-
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
14.80%
发文量
65
审稿时长
46 days
期刊介绍: Forensic Chemistry publishes high quality manuscripts focusing on the theory, research and application of any chemical science to forensic analysis. The scope of the journal includes fundamental advancements that result in a better understanding of the evidentiary significance derived from the physical and chemical analysis of materials. The scope of Forensic Chemistry will also include the application and or development of any molecular and atomic spectrochemical technique, electrochemical techniques, sensors, surface characterization techniques, mass spectrometry, nuclear magnetic resonance, chemometrics and statistics, and separation sciences (e.g. chromatography) that provide insight into the forensic analysis of materials. Evidential topics of interest to the journal include, but are not limited to, fingerprint analysis, drug analysis, ignitable liquid residue analysis, explosives detection and analysis, the characterization and comparison of trace evidence (glass, fibers, paints and polymers, tapes, soils and other materials), ink and paper analysis, gunshot residue analysis, synthetic pathways for drugs, toxicology and the analysis and chemistry associated with the components of fingermarks. The journal is particularly interested in receiving manuscripts that report advances in the forensic interpretation of chemical evidence. Technology Readiness Level: When submitting an article to Forensic Chemistry, all authors will be asked to self-assign a Technology Readiness Level (TRL) to their article. The purpose of the TRL system is to help readers understand the level of maturity of an idea or method, to help track the evolution of readiness of a given technique or method, and to help filter published articles by the expected ease of implementation in an operation setting within a crime lab.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信