Lessons learned from the DIG trial

Debra Egan M.Sc., M.P.H. , Nancy Geller Ph.D. , Salim Yusuf M.B.B.S., F.R.C.P. , Rekha Garg M.D., M.S. , Joseph F. Collins Sc.D. , James Mathew M.D. , Edward Philbin M.D. , on behalf of the DIG Investigators
{"title":"Lessons learned from the DIG trial","authors":"Debra Egan M.Sc., M.P.H. ,&nbsp;Nancy Geller Ph.D. ,&nbsp;Salim Yusuf M.B.B.S., F.R.C.P. ,&nbsp;Rekha Garg M.D., M.S. ,&nbsp;Joseph F. Collins Sc.D. ,&nbsp;James Mathew M.D. ,&nbsp;Edward Philbin M.D. ,&nbsp;on behalf of the DIG Investigators","doi":"10.1016/S0197-2456(03)00099-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) trial was the first large simple trial conducted by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute in conjunction with the Department of Veterans Affairs. A large simple trial is a major undertaking. Simplification at the sites requires careful planning and discipline. Lessons learned from the DIG trial were: (1) keep a large simple trial very simple and keep all study procedures very simple; (2) ancillary studies are important and can complement a large simple trial but require careful advanced planning; (3) anticipate special needs when shipping study drugs internationally; (4) regional coordinating centers can be very useful; (5) recruit as many capable sites as possible; (6) provide research-inexperienced sites/investigators with extra help to obtain federalwide assurance statements from the Office for Human Research Protections and institutional review board approvals; (7) adequately reimburse sites for the work completed; (8) maintain investigator enthusiasm; (9) monitor the slow performers and sites with numerous personnel changes; (10) choose an endpoint that is easy to ascertain; (11) keep the trial simple for participants; and (12) plan early for closeout and for activities between the end of the trial and publication of results.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72706,"journal":{"name":"Controlled clinical trials","volume":"24 6","pages":"Pages S316-S326"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0197-2456(03)00099-0","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Controlled clinical trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0197245603000990","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The Digitalis Investigation Group (DIG) trial was the first large simple trial conducted by the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute in conjunction with the Department of Veterans Affairs. A large simple trial is a major undertaking. Simplification at the sites requires careful planning and discipline. Lessons learned from the DIG trial were: (1) keep a large simple trial very simple and keep all study procedures very simple; (2) ancillary studies are important and can complement a large simple trial but require careful advanced planning; (3) anticipate special needs when shipping study drugs internationally; (4) regional coordinating centers can be very useful; (5) recruit as many capable sites as possible; (6) provide research-inexperienced sites/investigators with extra help to obtain federalwide assurance statements from the Office for Human Research Protections and institutional review board approvals; (7) adequately reimburse sites for the work completed; (8) maintain investigator enthusiasm; (9) monitor the slow performers and sites with numerous personnel changes; (10) choose an endpoint that is easy to ascertain; (11) keep the trial simple for participants; and (12) plan early for closeout and for activities between the end of the trial and publication of results.

从DIG试验中吸取的教训
洋地黄研究组(DIG)试验是由国家心脏、肺和血液研究所与退伍军人事务部联合进行的第一个大型简单试验。一项大型的简单试验是一项重大任务。场地的简化需要仔细的规划和纪律。从DIG试验中得到的教训是:(1)使大型简单试验非常简单,并使所有研究程序非常简单;(2)辅助研究很重要,可以作为大型简单试验的补充,但需要事先仔细规划;(三)在国际运输研究药品时预见到特殊需求;(4)区域协调中心非常有用;(5)尽可能多地招募有能力的人员;(6)为缺乏研究经验的站点/调查员提供额外帮助,以获得人类研究保护办公室的联邦保证声明和机构审查委员会的批准;(七)对已完成的工作给予充分的补偿;(8)保持调查热情;(9)监督业绩不佳和人员变动较多的场所;(十)选择易于确定的终点;(11)使试验对参与者保持简单;(12)尽早计划结束和试验结束至结果公布之间的活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信