Efficacy of olanzapine and olanzapine-fluoxetine combination in the treatment of bipolar I depression.

Mauricio Tohen, Eduard Vieta, Joseph Calabrese, Terence A Ketter, Gary Sachs, Charles Bowden, Philip B Mitchell, Franca Centorrino, Richard Risser, Robert W Baker, Angela R Evans, Karin Beymer, Sanjay Dube, Gary D Tollefson, Alan Breier
{"title":"Efficacy of olanzapine and olanzapine-fluoxetine combination in the treatment of bipolar I depression.","authors":"Mauricio Tohen,&nbsp;Eduard Vieta,&nbsp;Joseph Calabrese,&nbsp;Terence A Ketter,&nbsp;Gary Sachs,&nbsp;Charles Bowden,&nbsp;Philip B Mitchell,&nbsp;Franca Centorrino,&nbsp;Richard Risser,&nbsp;Robert W Baker,&nbsp;Angela R Evans,&nbsp;Karin Beymer,&nbsp;Sanjay Dube,&nbsp;Gary D Tollefson,&nbsp;Alan Breier","doi":"10.1001/archpsyc.60.11.1079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the longer duration of the depressive phase in bipolar disorder and the frequent clinical use of antidepressants combined with antipsychotics or mood stabilizers, relatively few controlled studies have examined treatment strategies for bipolar depression.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine the use of olanzapine and olanzapine-fluoxetine combination in the treatment of bipolar I depression.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Double-blind, 8-week, randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eighty-four sites (inpatient and outpatient) in 13 countries. Patients A total of 833 randomized adults with bipolar I depression with a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of at least 20. Intervention Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 377); olanzapine, 5 to 20 mg/d (n = 370); or olanzapine-fluoxetine combination, 6 and 25, 6 and 50, or 12 and 50 mg/d (n = 86).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measure: </strong>Changes in MADRS total scores using mixed-effects model repeated-measures analyses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During all 8 study weeks, the olanzapine and olanzapine-fluoxetine groups showed statistically significant improvement in depressive symptoms vs the placebo group (P<.001 for all). The olanzapine-fluoxetine group also showed statistically greater improvement than the olanzapine group at weeks 4 through 8. At week 8, MADRS total scores were lower than at baseline by 11.9, 15.0, and 18.5 points in the placebo, olanzapine, and olanzapine-fluoxetine groups, respectively. Remission criteria were met by 24.5% (87/355) of the placebo group, 32.8% (115/351) of the olanzapine group, and 48.8% (40/82) of the olanzapine-fluoxetine group. Treatment-emergent mania (Young Mania Rating Scale score <15 at baseline and > or =15 subsequently) did not differ among groups (placebo, 6.7% [23/345]; olanzapine, 5.7% [19/335]; and olanzapine-fluoxetine, 6.4% [5/78]). Adverse events for olanzapine-fluoxetine therapy were similar to those for olanzapine therapy but also included higher rates of nausea and diarrhea.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Olanzapine is more effective than placebo, and combined olanzapine-fluoxetine is more effective than olanzapine and placebo in the treatment of bipolar I depression without increased risk of developing manic symptoms.</p>","PeriodicalId":8286,"journal":{"name":"Archives of general psychiatry","volume":"60 11","pages":"1079-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1001/archpsyc.60.11.1079","citationCount":"826","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of general psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.60.11.1079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 826

Abstract

Background: Despite the longer duration of the depressive phase in bipolar disorder and the frequent clinical use of antidepressants combined with antipsychotics or mood stabilizers, relatively few controlled studies have examined treatment strategies for bipolar depression.

Objective: To examine the use of olanzapine and olanzapine-fluoxetine combination in the treatment of bipolar I depression.

Design: Double-blind, 8-week, randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Eighty-four sites (inpatient and outpatient) in 13 countries. Patients A total of 833 randomized adults with bipolar I depression with a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of at least 20. Intervention Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 377); olanzapine, 5 to 20 mg/d (n = 370); or olanzapine-fluoxetine combination, 6 and 25, 6 and 50, or 12 and 50 mg/d (n = 86).

Main outcome measure: Changes in MADRS total scores using mixed-effects model repeated-measures analyses.

Results: During all 8 study weeks, the olanzapine and olanzapine-fluoxetine groups showed statistically significant improvement in depressive symptoms vs the placebo group (P<.001 for all). The olanzapine-fluoxetine group also showed statistically greater improvement than the olanzapine group at weeks 4 through 8. At week 8, MADRS total scores were lower than at baseline by 11.9, 15.0, and 18.5 points in the placebo, olanzapine, and olanzapine-fluoxetine groups, respectively. Remission criteria were met by 24.5% (87/355) of the placebo group, 32.8% (115/351) of the olanzapine group, and 48.8% (40/82) of the olanzapine-fluoxetine group. Treatment-emergent mania (Young Mania Rating Scale score <15 at baseline and > or =15 subsequently) did not differ among groups (placebo, 6.7% [23/345]; olanzapine, 5.7% [19/335]; and olanzapine-fluoxetine, 6.4% [5/78]). Adverse events for olanzapine-fluoxetine therapy were similar to those for olanzapine therapy but also included higher rates of nausea and diarrhea.

Conclusions: Olanzapine is more effective than placebo, and combined olanzapine-fluoxetine is more effective than olanzapine and placebo in the treatment of bipolar I depression without increased risk of developing manic symptoms.

奥氮平与奥氮平-氟西汀联合治疗双相I型抑郁症的疗效观察。
背景:尽管双相情感障碍的抑郁期持续时间较长,并且临床经常使用抗抑郁药联合抗精神病药物或情绪稳定剂,但相对较少的对照研究检查了双相情感障碍的治疗策略。目的:探讨奥氮平与奥氮平-氟西汀联合治疗双相I型抑郁症的疗效。设计:双盲,8周,随机对照试验。环境:在13个国家的84个站点(住院和门诊)。患者共833名随机成人双相I型抑郁症患者,其蒙哥马利-阿斯伯格抑郁评定量表(MADRS)得分至少为20分。干预措施患者随机分配接受安慰剂治疗(n = 377);奥氮平,5 ~ 20mg /d (n = 370);或奥氮平-氟西汀组合,6和25,6和50,12和50mg /d (n = 86)。主要结果测量:使用混合效应模型重复测量分析MADRS总分的变化。结果:在所有8周的研究中,奥氮平组和奥氮平-氟西汀组与安慰剂组相比,抑郁症状的改善具有统计学意义(P或=15),组间无差异(安慰剂组,6.7% [23/345];奥氮平,5.7% [19/335];奥氮平-氟西汀,6.4%[5/78])。奥氮平-氟西汀治疗的不良事件与奥氮平治疗相似,但也包括更高的恶心和腹泻率。结论:奥氮平比安慰剂更有效,奥氮平-氟西汀联合治疗双相I型抑郁症比奥氮平和安慰剂更有效,且未增加出现躁狂症状的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Archives of general psychiatry
Archives of general psychiatry 医学-精神病学
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信