Social deprivation and breast cancer.

Aliki Taylor, K K Cheng
{"title":"Social deprivation and breast cancer.","authors":"Aliki Taylor,&nbsp;K K Cheng","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdg072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This cross-sectional study was carried out in a population-based setting in Worcestershire to investigate the relationship between social deprivation and other potential prognostic factors.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 762 female patients diagnosed with primary breast cancer between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 1999 were selected. Breast cancer included all new cases of primary invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. A total of 753 patients were matched by their postcode of residence to enumeration district Townsend score and then divided into three groups based on Townsend quintiles (affluent n = 478; middle n = 157; deprived n = 118). Main outcome measures were relationships between social deprivation and tumour type, stage at presentation, oestrogen receptor status, tumour grade and treatment type.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the most deprived women, affluent women were less likely to present with invasive ductal tumours (70.8 per cent versus 85.9 per cent, chi2 linear trend = 6.757, p = 0.009), tumours of higher grade (36.0 per cent versus 44.7 per cent, chi2 linear trend = 4.201, p = 0.040), and oestrogen receptor negative tumours (22.4 per cent versus 33.3 per cent, chi2 linear trend = 3.501, p = 0.061). There was no significant difference in stage or tumour size at presentation between deprivation groups. More deprived women with invasive tumours of less than 20 mm maximum diameter were significantly more likely to have mastectomies than affluent women (47.8 per cent versus 32.1 per cent, chi2 linear trend = 4.091, p = 0.043).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that level of social deprivation is associated with tumour type, grade and oestrogen receptor status. There was also a suggestion that increased level of deprivation was associated with increased risk of potentially unnecessary mastectomies.</p>","PeriodicalId":77224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/fdg072","citationCount":"55","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdg072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 55

Abstract

Background: This cross-sectional study was carried out in a population-based setting in Worcestershire to investigate the relationship between social deprivation and other potential prognostic factors.

Methods: A total of 762 female patients diagnosed with primary breast cancer between 1 January 1998 and 31 December 1999 were selected. Breast cancer included all new cases of primary invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ. A total of 753 patients were matched by their postcode of residence to enumeration district Townsend score and then divided into three groups based on Townsend quintiles (affluent n = 478; middle n = 157; deprived n = 118). Main outcome measures were relationships between social deprivation and tumour type, stage at presentation, oestrogen receptor status, tumour grade and treatment type.

Results: Compared with the most deprived women, affluent women were less likely to present with invasive ductal tumours (70.8 per cent versus 85.9 per cent, chi2 linear trend = 6.757, p = 0.009), tumours of higher grade (36.0 per cent versus 44.7 per cent, chi2 linear trend = 4.201, p = 0.040), and oestrogen receptor negative tumours (22.4 per cent versus 33.3 per cent, chi2 linear trend = 3.501, p = 0.061). There was no significant difference in stage or tumour size at presentation between deprivation groups. More deprived women with invasive tumours of less than 20 mm maximum diameter were significantly more likely to have mastectomies than affluent women (47.8 per cent versus 32.1 per cent, chi2 linear trend = 4.091, p = 0.043).

Conclusions: This study suggests that level of social deprivation is associated with tumour type, grade and oestrogen receptor status. There was also a suggestion that increased level of deprivation was associated with increased risk of potentially unnecessary mastectomies.

社会剥夺和乳腺癌。
背景:本横断面研究在伍斯特郡以人群为基础的环境中进行,以调查社会剥夺与其他潜在预后因素之间的关系。方法:选取1998年1月1日至1999年12月31日诊断为原发性乳腺癌的女性患者762例。乳腺癌包括所有新发的原发性浸润性乳腺癌和原位导管癌。将753例患者按其居住地邮政编码与抽样区Townsend评分进行匹配,然后根据Townsend五分位数分为三组(富裕组= 478;中n = 157;被剥夺n = 118)。主要观察指标为社会剥夺与肿瘤类型、表现阶段、雌激素受体状态、肿瘤分级和治疗类型之间的关系。结果:与最贫困的妇女相比,富裕妇女较不容易出现浸润性导管肿瘤(70.8%对85.9%,chi2线性趋势= 6.757,p = 0.009)、更高级别肿瘤(36.0%对44.7%,chi2线性趋势= 4.201,p = 0.040)和雌激素受体阴性肿瘤(22.4%对33.3%,chi2线性趋势= 3.501,p = 0.061)。两组患者在分期和肿瘤大小上无显著差异。患有最大直径小于20毫米侵袭性肿瘤的贫困妇女比富裕妇女更有可能接受乳房切除术(47.8%对32.1%,χ 2线性趋势= 4.091,p = 0.043)。结论:本研究表明,社会剥夺程度与肿瘤类型、分级和雌激素受体状态有关。还有一种建议认为,剥夺程度的增加与潜在不必要的乳房切除术的风险增加有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信