PCR and Mosquito dissection as tools to monitor filarial infection levels following mass treatment.

David S Goodman, Jean-Nicolas Orelus, Jacquelin M Roberts, Patrick J Lammie, Thomas G Streit
{"title":"PCR and Mosquito dissection as tools to monitor filarial infection levels following mass treatment.","authors":"David S Goodman,&nbsp;Jean-Nicolas Orelus,&nbsp;Jacquelin M Roberts,&nbsp;Patrick J Lammie,&nbsp;Thomas G Streit","doi":"10.1186/1475-2883-2-11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BACKGROUND: Entomological methods may provide important tools for monitoring the progress of lymphatic filariasis elimination programs. In this study, we compared dissection of the vector, Culex quinquefasciatus, with the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to assess filarial infection levels in mosquitoes in the context of a lymphatic filariasis elimination program in Leogane, Haiti. METHODS: Mosquitoes were collected using gravid traps located in 4 sentinel communities with Wuchereria bancrofti microfilaria prevalence that ranged from 0.8% to 15.9%. Captured mosquitoes were divided between dissection, to enumerate W. bancrofti larvae (L1, L2, L3) and desiccation for later analysis by PCR. PCR was conducted on DNA extracts from pooled mosquitoes (1-15 pooled females) utilizing a competitive PCR system with primers specific for the Ssp I repeat. PCR products were analyzed with a hybridization ELISA using probes specific for a control sequence and the Ssp I repeat. RESULTS: The prevalence of mosquito infection with W. bancrofti ranged from 0%-3.66% by dissection (L1-L3) and point estimates of infection prevalence, as assayed by PCR, ranged from 0.25% - 9.16%. Following mass treatment, W. bancrofti infection prevalence dropped significantly as determined by PCR and dissection in 2 of the 4 sentinel sites (Leogane and Barrier Jeudi, P = 0.04 and P = 0.005, respectively). Although transmission declined in the other two sites, larval recoveries were low and these changes were not statistically significant. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that a single round of mass treatment can have an impact on transmission of lymphatic filariasis. The use of entomologic methods as a tool to monitor filariasis programs and the statistical limitations of mosquito trapping are discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":84756,"journal":{"name":"Filaria journal","volume":"2 1","pages":"11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/1475-2883-2-11","citationCount":"74","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Filaria journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/1475-2883-2-11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 74

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Entomological methods may provide important tools for monitoring the progress of lymphatic filariasis elimination programs. In this study, we compared dissection of the vector, Culex quinquefasciatus, with the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) to assess filarial infection levels in mosquitoes in the context of a lymphatic filariasis elimination program in Leogane, Haiti. METHODS: Mosquitoes were collected using gravid traps located in 4 sentinel communities with Wuchereria bancrofti microfilaria prevalence that ranged from 0.8% to 15.9%. Captured mosquitoes were divided between dissection, to enumerate W. bancrofti larvae (L1, L2, L3) and desiccation for later analysis by PCR. PCR was conducted on DNA extracts from pooled mosquitoes (1-15 pooled females) utilizing a competitive PCR system with primers specific for the Ssp I repeat. PCR products were analyzed with a hybridization ELISA using probes specific for a control sequence and the Ssp I repeat. RESULTS: The prevalence of mosquito infection with W. bancrofti ranged from 0%-3.66% by dissection (L1-L3) and point estimates of infection prevalence, as assayed by PCR, ranged from 0.25% - 9.16%. Following mass treatment, W. bancrofti infection prevalence dropped significantly as determined by PCR and dissection in 2 of the 4 sentinel sites (Leogane and Barrier Jeudi, P = 0.04 and P = 0.005, respectively). Although transmission declined in the other two sites, larval recoveries were low and these changes were not statistically significant. DISCUSSION: Our results suggest that a single round of mass treatment can have an impact on transmission of lymphatic filariasis. The use of entomologic methods as a tool to monitor filariasis programs and the statistical limitations of mosquito trapping are discussed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

PCR和蚊子解剖作为监测大规模治疗后丝虫病感染水平的工具。
背景:昆虫学方法可能为监测淋巴丝虫病消除计划的进展提供重要工具。在这项研究中,我们将致倦库蚊载体的解剖与聚合酶链式反应(PCR)进行了比较,以在海地莱奥甘的淋巴丝虫病消除计划中评估蚊子的丝虫病感染水平。方法:使用妊娠捕捉器收集4个哨点群落中的蚊子,斑叶虎微丝蚴患病率在0.8%至15.9%之间。捕获的蚊子分为解剖、计数斑叶虎幼虫(L1、L2、L3)和干燥两种,以备日后通过PCR进行分析。利用具有Ssp I重复序列特异性引物的竞争性PCR系统对来自合并蚊子(1-15只合并雌性)的DNA提取物进行PCR。使用对对照序列和Ssp I重复序列特异的探针,用杂交ELISA分析PCR产物。结果:通过解剖(L1-L3),bancrofti对蚊子的感染率在0%-3.66%之间,通过PCR检测,感染率的点估计值在0.25%-9.16%之间,通过PCR和解剖测定,在4个哨点中的2个哨点(Leogane和Barrier Jeudi,分别为P=0.04和P=0.005),班克罗夫特感染率显著下降。尽管其他两个地点的传播有所下降,但幼虫的恢复率很低,这些变化在统计上并不显著。讨论:我们的研究结果表明,单轮大规模治疗可以对淋巴丝虫病的传播产生影响。讨论了昆虫学方法作为监测丝虫病计划的工具的使用以及诱捕蚊子的统计局限性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信