Paradigm shifts in Medicare reform.

Research agenda brief Pub Date : 1996-04-01
S B Jones, L Etheredge
{"title":"Paradigm shifts in Medicare reform.","authors":"S B Jones,&nbsp;L Etheredge","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Reforms passed by Congress and vetoed by the president during the past year would have accelerated initiatives already transforming Medicare. Operating in a rapidly changing insurance marketplace, Medicare is shifting from a social insurance model toward a private individual insurance model-expanding the number and type of alternative health plans it offers-and growing numbers of beneficiaries are enrolling in these plans. Such reforms, especially if bolstered by legislative reforms that are likely to resurface after the November elections, will rewrite the social contract enacted more than 30 years ago. They require fundamental shifts in ways of thinking about the federal government's responsibilities; the Medicare program's management; relations between the Medicare program and doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers; and the role of beneficiaries in the Medicare program. The likely deferral of further legislative attempts to reform Medicare affords an opportunity to step back and consider these ongoing changes. It is not easy to describe paradigm shifts accurately, but there are advantages to trying. First, conceptual comparisons can allow public discussion to go beyond budget scorekeeping and media soundbites to consider how different the Medicare program will be if it evolves in the new ways being proposed. Second, a conceptual framework can assist health policy analysts to target what to watch for in tracking changes, to assess the tradeoffs involved, and to advise about the needs for refining legislation. This paper includes examples of what to watch for in tracking the implemented changes. The paradigm shifts are summarized below, then described individually in terms of directions of change along a number of continuums. Note that complete paradigm shifts, from one end of a continuum to the other, are seldom completely realized nor even far advanced. But Medicare's ongoing reforms, accelerated by legislative proposals, seem likely predecessors of future changes. For developing this framework, the authors have drawn on the Medicare provisions of the Conference Agreement on the Balanced Budget Act of 1995, the president's proposals as presented in December 1995, and current and proposed Health Care Financing Administration practices.</p>","PeriodicalId":86195,"journal":{"name":"Research agenda brief","volume":" 6","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1996-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research agenda brief","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Reforms passed by Congress and vetoed by the president during the past year would have accelerated initiatives already transforming Medicare. Operating in a rapidly changing insurance marketplace, Medicare is shifting from a social insurance model toward a private individual insurance model-expanding the number and type of alternative health plans it offers-and growing numbers of beneficiaries are enrolling in these plans. Such reforms, especially if bolstered by legislative reforms that are likely to resurface after the November elections, will rewrite the social contract enacted more than 30 years ago. They require fundamental shifts in ways of thinking about the federal government's responsibilities; the Medicare program's management; relations between the Medicare program and doctors, hospitals, and other health care providers; and the role of beneficiaries in the Medicare program. The likely deferral of further legislative attempts to reform Medicare affords an opportunity to step back and consider these ongoing changes. It is not easy to describe paradigm shifts accurately, but there are advantages to trying. First, conceptual comparisons can allow public discussion to go beyond budget scorekeeping and media soundbites to consider how different the Medicare program will be if it evolves in the new ways being proposed. Second, a conceptual framework can assist health policy analysts to target what to watch for in tracking changes, to assess the tradeoffs involved, and to advise about the needs for refining legislation. This paper includes examples of what to watch for in tracking the implemented changes. The paradigm shifts are summarized below, then described individually in terms of directions of change along a number of continuums. Note that complete paradigm shifts, from one end of a continuum to the other, are seldom completely realized nor even far advanced. But Medicare's ongoing reforms, accelerated by legislative proposals, seem likely predecessors of future changes. For developing this framework, the authors have drawn on the Medicare provisions of the Conference Agreement on the Balanced Budget Act of 1995, the president's proposals as presented in December 1995, and current and proposed Health Care Financing Administration practices.

医疗保险改革的范式转变。
在过去的一年里,国会通过但被总统否决的改革将加速已经在改变医疗保险的举措。在瞬息万变的保险市场中,医疗保险正在从一种社会保险模式转向一种私人保险模式——扩大了可供选择的健康计划的数量和类型——越来越多的受益人加入了这些计划。这些改革,特别是在11月选举后可能重新出现的立法改革的支持下,将改写30多年前制定的社会契约。他们需要从根本上转变对联邦政府职责的思考方式;医疗保险计划的管理;医疗保险计划与医生、医院和其他医疗保健提供者之间的关系;以及医疗保险计划受益人的角色。改革医疗保险的进一步立法尝试可能被推迟,这为我们提供了一个退一步思考这些正在发生的变化的机会。准确地描述范式转变并不容易,但尝试是有好处的。首先,概念比较可以让公众讨论超越预算记分和媒体言论,考虑如果医疗保险计划按照拟议的新方式发展,它将有多大的不同。其次,概念框架可以帮助卫生政策分析人员确定在跟踪变化时需要注意什么,评估所涉及的权衡,并就完善立法的需要提出建议。本文包括在跟踪实现的更改时需要注意的示例。范式转换总结如下,然后根据沿着若干连续体的变化方向单独描述。请注意,从一个连续体的一端到另一端的完全范式转换,很少完全实现,甚至没有进展。但由于立法提案的推动,医疗保险正在进行的改革似乎是未来变革的前奏。为了发展这一框架,作者借鉴了1995年平衡预算法案会议协议中的医疗保险条款,1995年12月提出的总统提案,以及当前和拟议的医疗融资管理实践。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书