Risk identification, assessment and management in public health practice: a practical approach in one public health department.

R Suckling, M Ferris, C Price
{"title":"Risk identification, assessment and management in public health practice: a practical approach in one public health department.","authors":"R Suckling,&nbsp;M Ferris,&nbsp;C Price","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdg029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The continuing identification, assessment and management of risks are key themes for clinical governance. These themes are being integrated into both primary and secondary care practice; however, integration into public health practice appears much slower. This paper describes the recent approach that we have taken in Sheffield, and proposes a model for public health departments to identify, assess and manage risks, which complements other risk management processes and is transferable to other settings. It assumes that public health practice is not a risk-free activity and holds that the process of identifying, assessing and managing risks is a key component to raising standards.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A number of risk 'management' models were reviewed and a primary care approach was applied to public health practice. A list of potential risks was identified using a number of methods including reflective practice, information from complaints and/or critical incidents. Risks were assessed by likelihood and impact, and were captured in a risk framework.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>By March 2002, 21 risks had been identified and characterized, and progress had been made to manage 11 of these risks.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This process, and the development of a risk framework, was useful in identifying a prioritized work programme to improve standards of public health practice in this department. This model can also be used not only for planning risk management activities, continual identification and assessment of risks but also to provide inspiration for other clinical governance activities including public health audit.</p>","PeriodicalId":77224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/fdg029","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdg029","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Background: The continuing identification, assessment and management of risks are key themes for clinical governance. These themes are being integrated into both primary and secondary care practice; however, integration into public health practice appears much slower. This paper describes the recent approach that we have taken in Sheffield, and proposes a model for public health departments to identify, assess and manage risks, which complements other risk management processes and is transferable to other settings. It assumes that public health practice is not a risk-free activity and holds that the process of identifying, assessing and managing risks is a key component to raising standards.

Methods: A number of risk 'management' models were reviewed and a primary care approach was applied to public health practice. A list of potential risks was identified using a number of methods including reflective practice, information from complaints and/or critical incidents. Risks were assessed by likelihood and impact, and were captured in a risk framework.

Results: By March 2002, 21 risks had been identified and characterized, and progress had been made to manage 11 of these risks.

Conclusion: This process, and the development of a risk framework, was useful in identifying a prioritized work programme to improve standards of public health practice in this department. This model can also be used not only for planning risk management activities, continual identification and assessment of risks but also to provide inspiration for other clinical governance activities including public health audit.

公共卫生实践中的风险识别、评估和管理:一个公共卫生部门的实用方法。
背景:持续识别、评估和管理风险是临床治理的关键主题。这些主题正在纳入初级和二级保健实践;然而,将其纳入公共卫生实践似乎要慢得多。本文描述了我们最近在谢菲尔德采取的方法,并为公共卫生部门提出了一个识别、评估和管理风险的模型,该模型补充了其他风险管理过程,并可转移到其他环境中。它假定公共卫生做法不是一项无风险的活动,并认为确定、评估和管理风险的过程是提高标准的关键组成部分。方法:回顾了一些风险“管理”模型,并将初级保健方法应用于公共卫生实践。通过反思实践、投诉信息和/或关键事件等多种方法,确定了潜在风险清单。通过可能性和影响评估风险,并在风险框架中捕获风险。结果:到2002年3月,已识别和描述了21个风险,并在管理其中11个风险方面取得了进展。结论:这一进程以及风险框架的制定有助于确定优先工作方案,以提高该部门公共卫生实践的标准。该模型不仅可用于规划风险管理活动、持续识别和评估风险,还可为包括公共卫生审计在内的其他临床治理活动提供启发。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信