Self-exclusion from health care in women at high risk for postpartum depression.

Lynne Murray, Matt Woolgar, Joseph Murray, Peter Cooper
{"title":"Self-exclusion from health care in women at high risk for postpartum depression.","authors":"Lynne Murray,&nbsp;Matt Woolgar,&nbsp;Joseph Murray,&nbsp;Peter Cooper","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdg028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>A significant proportion of women who are vulnerable to postnatal depression refuse to engage in treatment programmes. Little is known about them, other than some general demographic characteristics. In particular, their access to health care and their own and their infants' health outcomes are uncharted.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a nested cohort case-control study, using data from computerized health systems, and general practitioner (GP) and maternity records, to identify the characteristics, health service contacts, and maternal and infant health outcomes for primiparous antenatal clinic attenders at high risk for postnatal depression who either refused (self-exclusion group) or else agreed (take-up group) to receive additional Health Visiting support in pregnancy and the first 2 months postpartum.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Women excluding themselves from Health Visitor support were younger and less highly educated than women willing to take up the support. They were less likely to attend midwifery, GP and routine Health Visitor appointments, but were more likely to book in late and to attend accident and emergency department (A&E). Their infants had poorer outcome in terms of gestation, birthweight and breastfeeding. Differences between the groups still obtained when age and education were taken into account for midwifery contacts, A&E attendance and gestation; the difference in the initiation of breast feeding was attenuated, but not wholly explained, by age and education.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A subgroup of psychologically vulnerable child-bearing women are at particular risk for poor access to health care and adverse infant outcome. Barriers to take-up of services need to be understood in order better to deliver care.</p>","PeriodicalId":77224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/fdg028","citationCount":"96","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdg028","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 96

Abstract

Background: A significant proportion of women who are vulnerable to postnatal depression refuse to engage in treatment programmes. Little is known about them, other than some general demographic characteristics. In particular, their access to health care and their own and their infants' health outcomes are uncharted.

Methods: We conducted a nested cohort case-control study, using data from computerized health systems, and general practitioner (GP) and maternity records, to identify the characteristics, health service contacts, and maternal and infant health outcomes for primiparous antenatal clinic attenders at high risk for postnatal depression who either refused (self-exclusion group) or else agreed (take-up group) to receive additional Health Visiting support in pregnancy and the first 2 months postpartum.

Results: Women excluding themselves from Health Visitor support were younger and less highly educated than women willing to take up the support. They were less likely to attend midwifery, GP and routine Health Visitor appointments, but were more likely to book in late and to attend accident and emergency department (A&E). Their infants had poorer outcome in terms of gestation, birthweight and breastfeeding. Differences between the groups still obtained when age and education were taken into account for midwifery contacts, A&E attendance and gestation; the difference in the initiation of breast feeding was attenuated, but not wholly explained, by age and education.

Conclusion: A subgroup of psychologically vulnerable child-bearing women are at particular risk for poor access to health care and adverse infant outcome. Barriers to take-up of services need to be understood in order better to deliver care.

产后抑郁症高危妇女的自我排斥。
背景:很大一部分易患产后抑郁症的妇女拒绝参加治疗方案。除了一些一般的人口特征外,对它们知之甚少。特别是,她们获得医疗保健的机会以及她们自己及其婴儿的健康状况都不得而知。方法:我们进行了一项嵌套队列病例对照研究,使用计算机化卫生系统、全科医生(GP)和产妇记录的数据,以确定产后抑郁症高风险的初产产前门诊服务人员的特征、卫生服务联系人和母婴健康结果,这些人要么拒绝(自我排除组),要么同意(纳入组)在怀孕期间和产后头2个月接受额外的健康访问支持。结果:将自己排除在保健访视员支持之外的妇女比愿意接受支持的妇女更年轻,受教育程度更低。他们不太可能参加助产、全科医生和常规健康访问者的预约,但更有可能预约到很晚,并去急诊科(A&E)。她们的婴儿在妊娠期、出生体重和母乳喂养方面的结果较差。当考虑到助产接触、急诊就诊和妊娠的年龄和教育程度时,各组之间的差异仍然存在;开始母乳喂养的差异在年龄和教育程度上有所减弱,但不能完全解释。结论:心理脆弱的育龄妇女的一个亚群特别容易难以获得保健和不良的婴儿结局。为了更好地提供护理,需要了解接受服务的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信