Do community based self-reading sphygmomanometers improve detection of hypertension? A feasibility study.

William Hamilton, Alison Round, Rebecca Goodchild, Cindy Baker
{"title":"Do community based self-reading sphygmomanometers improve detection of hypertension? A feasibility study.","authors":"William Hamilton,&nbsp;Alison Round,&nbsp;Rebecca Goodchild,&nbsp;Cindy Baker","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdg027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension is a major risk factor for stroke and ischaemic heart disease. Most hypertension is detected opportunistically by general practitioners. Those who rarely use medical services are less likely to have their blood pressure (BP) measured. We hypothesized that open access self-reading BP measurement would detect previously unrecognized hypertension.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Self-reading sphygmomanometers were placed at 13 public sites in Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom. Machine use was determined by users completing a proforma and by direct observation of sites. Users whose BP reading was above an action level of 135/85 mmHg were asked to attend their general practice. General practitioner records were reviewed 6 months after machine use to identify diagnoses of hypertension. A random sample of users was interviewed, and local general practices were asked about effects on their workload.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 758 first time users completed a proforma fully, although direct observations suggested total use was much higher. Of the total, 221 (29.2 per cent) readings were above the action level. Eleven new hypertensives were found, 1.4 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval (CI 0.7-2.5) of the total users. User acceptability was high. All general practice replies were supportive.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Open access sphygmomanometry for detection of hypertension is feasible. This scheme led to the diagnosis of hypertension in 1.4 per cent of users, and allowed many people to measure their BP in a way convenient to them. Before recommending wider implementation we suggest a study examining if our results are transferable to other settings, and if this approach reduces inequalities and is cost-effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":77224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/fdg027","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdg027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is a major risk factor for stroke and ischaemic heart disease. Most hypertension is detected opportunistically by general practitioners. Those who rarely use medical services are less likely to have their blood pressure (BP) measured. We hypothesized that open access self-reading BP measurement would detect previously unrecognized hypertension.

Methods: Self-reading sphygmomanometers were placed at 13 public sites in Exeter, Devon, United Kingdom. Machine use was determined by users completing a proforma and by direct observation of sites. Users whose BP reading was above an action level of 135/85 mmHg were asked to attend their general practice. General practitioner records were reviewed 6 months after machine use to identify diagnoses of hypertension. A random sample of users was interviewed, and local general practices were asked about effects on their workload.

Results: A total of 758 first time users completed a proforma fully, although direct observations suggested total use was much higher. Of the total, 221 (29.2 per cent) readings were above the action level. Eleven new hypertensives were found, 1.4 per cent (95 per cent confidence interval (CI 0.7-2.5) of the total users. User acceptability was high. All general practice replies were supportive.

Conclusion: Open access sphygmomanometry for detection of hypertension is feasible. This scheme led to the diagnosis of hypertension in 1.4 per cent of users, and allowed many people to measure their BP in a way convenient to them. Before recommending wider implementation we suggest a study examining if our results are transferable to other settings, and if this approach reduces inequalities and is cost-effective.

社区自读式血压计是否能提高高血压的检出率?可行性研究。
背景:高血压是中风和缺血性心脏病的主要危险因素。大多数高血压是由全科医生偶然发现的。那些很少使用医疗服务的人不太可能测量他们的血压。我们假设开放获取的自读血压测量可以检测到以前未被识别的高血压。方法:在英国德文郡埃克塞特的13个公共场所放置自读式血压计。机器的使用是由用户填写表格和直接观察网站来确定的。血压读数高于135/85毫米汞柱的用户被要求参加他们的一般实践。全科医生的记录在使用机器后6个月进行检查,以确定高血压的诊断。对用户随机抽样进行了采访,并询问了当地的一般做法对其工作量的影响。结果:共有758名首次使用者完全完成了形式表格,尽管直接观察表明总使用量要高得多。其中,221个(29.2%)读数高于行动水平。新发现11例高血压,占总使用者的1.4%(95%可信区间(CI 0.7-2.5))。用户接受度高。所有的一般性答复都是支持的。结论:开放获取血压计检测高血压是可行的。该方案导致1.4%的用户被诊断出高血压,并允许许多人以方便的方式测量血压。在建议更广泛的实施之前,我们建议进行一项研究,检查我们的结果是否可转移到其他环境中,以及这种方法是否减少了不平等并具有成本效益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信