{"title":"A review of otolaryngology equipment provision in a peripheral clinic setting.","authors":"A J Cain, M R Laing","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the adequacy of otolaryngology equipment provision in peripheral outpatient clinics.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Prospective questionnaire study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Five peripheral otolaryngology clinics in the Highlands of Scotland. (Thurso, Golspie, Dingwall, Fort William and Skye).</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>All patients attending the above clinics over a six-month period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The questionnaire return rate was 70%. 30% of patients may have had improved care had the equipment provision been adequate. Nine percent of patients required to be reviewed elsewhere due to inadequate equipment. The annual cost of these reviews exceeds 15,000 Pounds.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The provision of adequate clinic equipment would have medium to long term economic advantages and also has relevance in relation to clinical governance and potential medico-legal concerns. The results of this review are timely as a recent BAO-HNS document has confirmed the equipment provision we describe above as being at the minimal acceptable level.</p>","PeriodicalId":75896,"journal":{"name":"Health bulletin","volume":"58 6","pages":"467-70"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: To assess the adequacy of otolaryngology equipment provision in peripheral outpatient clinics.
Design: Prospective questionnaire study.
Setting: Five peripheral otolaryngology clinics in the Highlands of Scotland. (Thurso, Golspie, Dingwall, Fort William and Skye).
Subjects: All patients attending the above clinics over a six-month period.
Results: The questionnaire return rate was 70%. 30% of patients may have had improved care had the equipment provision been adequate. Nine percent of patients required to be reviewed elsewhere due to inadequate equipment. The annual cost of these reviews exceeds 15,000 Pounds.
Conclusion: The provision of adequate clinic equipment would have medium to long term economic advantages and also has relevance in relation to clinical governance and potential medico-legal concerns. The results of this review are timely as a recent BAO-HNS document has confirmed the equipment provision we describe above as being at the minimal acceptable level.
目的:评价周边门诊耳鼻喉科设备配备的充分性。设计:前瞻性问卷研究。地点:苏格兰高地的五个周边耳鼻喉科诊所。(Thurso, Golspie, Dingwall, Fort William和Skye)。对象:6个月以上在上述诊所就诊的患者。结果:问卷回收率为70%。如果设备供应充足,30%的患者可能会得到更好的护理。由于设备不足,9%的患者需要到其他地方复查。这些审查的年度费用超过15,000英镑。结论:提供足够的临床设备将具有中长期的经济优势,并且与临床治理和潜在的医学法律问题相关。这次审查的结果是及时的,因为最近的一份BAO-HNS文件确认了我们上面描述的设备供应处于最低可接受水平。