Effect of general practitioner hospitals on district general hospital bed use in the Highlands of Scotland.

Health bulletin Pub Date : 2000-09-01
C Stark, K Oliver, P Hopkins
{"title":"Effect of general practitioner hospitals on district general hospital bed use in the Highlands of Scotland.","authors":"C Stark,&nbsp;K Oliver,&nbsp;P Hopkins","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine hospital bed use by General Practices with and without access to General Practitioner beds.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Information from the Contract Management System for General Medicine and Surgery, and from SMR returns for Geriatric Medicine and GP beds was used to compare hospital bed use in District General Hospitals (DGHs) and in General Practitioner beds for practices with and without access to GP beds. Age adjusted rates were calculated for overall use of each specialty.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>All General Practices in the Highland Health Board area for December 1995-April 1997.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared to practices with no access to GP beds, practices with access used 39.4% fewer bed days per 1000 patients for medical specialties; 18% fewer bed days for surgical specialties; 34.5% fewer bed days for geriatric medicine, and 4.9% fewer bed days for other DGH specialties. Taking into account GP bed day use, practices with access to GP beds used 6.1% more hospital bed days per 1000 patients than did practices with no access.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings largely replicate work in England that found substantial decreases in General Medical and Geriatric Medicine bed use in Practices with access to GP beds, combined with an overall increase in occupied bed day use of 6-8% per 1000 patients. The lower use of surgical beds was unexpected, and may reflect more flexible use of GP beds in the Highlands for observation or rehabilitation, possibly related to the far greater distances involved than in the English studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":75896,"journal":{"name":"Health bulletin","volume":"58 5","pages":"385-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To examine hospital bed use by General Practices with and without access to General Practitioner beds.

Design: Information from the Contract Management System for General Medicine and Surgery, and from SMR returns for Geriatric Medicine and GP beds was used to compare hospital bed use in District General Hospitals (DGHs) and in General Practitioner beds for practices with and without access to GP beds. Age adjusted rates were calculated for overall use of each specialty.

Setting: All General Practices in the Highland Health Board area for December 1995-April 1997.

Results: Compared to practices with no access to GP beds, practices with access used 39.4% fewer bed days per 1000 patients for medical specialties; 18% fewer bed days for surgical specialties; 34.5% fewer bed days for geriatric medicine, and 4.9% fewer bed days for other DGH specialties. Taking into account GP bed day use, practices with access to GP beds used 6.1% more hospital bed days per 1000 patients than did practices with no access.

Conclusion: These findings largely replicate work in England that found substantial decreases in General Medical and Geriatric Medicine bed use in Practices with access to GP beds, combined with an overall increase in occupied bed day use of 6-8% per 1000 patients. The lower use of surgical beds was unexpected, and may reflect more flexible use of GP beds in the Highlands for observation or rehabilitation, possibly related to the far greater distances involved than in the English studies.

全科医院对苏格兰高地地区综合医院床位使用的影响
目的:调查全科医生使用和不使用全科医生病床的情况。设计:来自全科医学和外科合同管理系统的信息,以及来自老年医学和全科医生床位的SMR报表,用于比较地区综合医院(DGHs)的病床使用情况,以及有和没有全科医生床位的全科医生病床使用情况。对每个专科的总体使用情况计算年龄调整率。背景:1995年12月至1997年4月高地卫生局辖区的所有一般做法。结果:与无法获得全科医生床位的诊所相比,可以获得全科医生床位的诊所每1000名患者的住院天数减少了39.4%;外科专科的住院天数减少18%;老年医学的住院天数减少了34.5%,其他DGH专科的住院天数减少了4.9%。考虑到全科医生的床位日使用情况,有全科医生床位的诊所每1000名患者的住院天数比没有床位的诊所多6.1%。结论:这些发现在很大程度上重复了英国的工作,发现普通医学和老年医学的床位使用在获得全科医生床位的实践中大幅减少,同时每1000名患者占用床位日使用率总体增加6-8%。手术床位的使用率较低是出乎意料的,这可能反映了高原地区GP床位在观察或康复方面的更灵活使用,可能与英国研究中涉及的距离更远有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书