Low dependency residents in private nursing homes in Glasgow.

Health bulletin Pub Date : 2001-01-01
G M Penrice, L Simpson, L de Caestecker, G Brown, S Gillies
{"title":"Low dependency residents in private nursing homes in Glasgow.","authors":"G M Penrice,&nbsp;L Simpson,&nbsp;L de Caestecker,&nbsp;G Brown,&nbsp;S Gillies","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To investigate why nursing home care had been recommended for elderly people who were assessed subsequently as being of low dependency.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Examination of community care assessment documentation for low dependency residents to assess reasons for recommending nursing home care; comparison of these with data from a subsequent SCRUGs (Scottish Care Resource Utilisation Groups) assessment.</p><p><strong>Setting and subjects: </strong>Three hundred and four residents within eight private nursing homes in Glasgow.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Twenty six percent of the residents were described as being of low dependency. Of these, 44% had dementia and 6% personal care needs alone; 29% had medical problems which required nursing input, but not necessarily to a level requiring nursing home care. Information in the community care assessment often described a higher level of need than that identified subsequently. From the information given in the medical component of the community care assessment it was often unclear why the decision to recommend nursing home care was made.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Admission to nursing homes may be encouraged by over-emphasiZing care requirements, by placing emphasis on safety rather than independence and by inadequate recording of information. Elderly people who cannot remain at home need improved assessment procedures, better understanding of their needs and a wider range of accommodation options.</p>","PeriodicalId":75896,"journal":{"name":"Health bulletin","volume":"59 1","pages":"15-20"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To investigate why nursing home care had been recommended for elderly people who were assessed subsequently as being of low dependency.

Design: Examination of community care assessment documentation for low dependency residents to assess reasons for recommending nursing home care; comparison of these with data from a subsequent SCRUGs (Scottish Care Resource Utilisation Groups) assessment.

Setting and subjects: Three hundred and four residents within eight private nursing homes in Glasgow.

Results: Twenty six percent of the residents were described as being of low dependency. Of these, 44% had dementia and 6% personal care needs alone; 29% had medical problems which required nursing input, but not necessarily to a level requiring nursing home care. Information in the community care assessment often described a higher level of need than that identified subsequently. From the information given in the medical component of the community care assessment it was often unclear why the decision to recommend nursing home care was made.

Conclusion: Admission to nursing homes may be encouraged by over-emphasiZing care requirements, by placing emphasis on safety rather than independence and by inadequate recording of information. Elderly people who cannot remain at home need improved assessment procedures, better understanding of their needs and a wider range of accommodation options.

格拉斯哥私人疗养院的低依赖性居民。
目的:调查为什么养老院被推荐给后来被评估为低依赖的老年人。设计:检视低依赖居民的社区照护评估文件,以评估推荐敬老院照护的理由;将这些数据与随后的SCRUGs(苏格兰护理资源利用小组)评估的数据进行比较。环境和研究对象:格拉斯哥八家私人疗养院的三百四名居民。结果:26%的居民被描述为低依赖性。其中44%患有痴呆症,6%需要单独的个人护理;29%的人有医疗问题,需要护理投入,但不一定需要养老院护理。社区护理评估中的信息通常描述了比随后确定的更高层次的需求。从社区护理评估的医疗部分提供的信息来看,通常不清楚为什么决定推荐养老院护理。结论:过分强调护理要求,强调安全而不是独立性,以及信息记录不充分,可能会鼓励疗养院的入院。不能住在家中的长者需要改善评估程序,更了解他们的需要,并有更广泛的住宿选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书