Genetically altered mouse models: the good, the bad, and the ugly.

Tamizchelvi Thyagarajan, Satish Totey, Mary Jo S Danton, Ashok B Kulkarni
{"title":"Genetically altered mouse models: the good, the bad, and the ugly.","authors":"Tamizchelvi Thyagarajan,&nbsp;Satish Totey,&nbsp;Mary Jo S Danton,&nbsp;Ashok B Kulkarni","doi":"10.1177/154411130301400302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Targeted gene disruption in mice is a powerful tool for generating murine models for human development and disease. While the human genome program has helped to generate numerous candidate genes, few genes have been characterized for their precise in vivo functions. Gene targeting has had an enormous impact on our ability to delineate the functional roles of these genes. Many gene knockout mouse models faithfully mimic the phenotypes of the human diseases. Because some models display an unexpected or no phenotype, controversy has arisen about the value of gene-targeting strategies. We argue in favor of gene-targeting strategies, provided they are used with caution, particularly in interpreting phenotypes in craniofacial and oral biology, where many genes have pleiotropic roles. The potential pitfalls are outweighed by the unique opportunities for developing and testing different therapeutic strategies before they are introduced into the clinic. In the future, we believe that genetically engineered animal models will be indispensable for gaining important insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying development, as well as disease pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment.</p>","PeriodicalId":77086,"journal":{"name":"Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists","volume":"14 3","pages":"154-74"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/154411130301400302","citationCount":"27","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical reviews in oral biology and medicine : an official publication of the American Association of Oral Biologists","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/154411130301400302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 27

Abstract

Targeted gene disruption in mice is a powerful tool for generating murine models for human development and disease. While the human genome program has helped to generate numerous candidate genes, few genes have been characterized for their precise in vivo functions. Gene targeting has had an enormous impact on our ability to delineate the functional roles of these genes. Many gene knockout mouse models faithfully mimic the phenotypes of the human diseases. Because some models display an unexpected or no phenotype, controversy has arisen about the value of gene-targeting strategies. We argue in favor of gene-targeting strategies, provided they are used with caution, particularly in interpreting phenotypes in craniofacial and oral biology, where many genes have pleiotropic roles. The potential pitfalls are outweighed by the unique opportunities for developing and testing different therapeutic strategies before they are introduced into the clinic. In the future, we believe that genetically engineered animal models will be indispensable for gaining important insights into the molecular mechanisms underlying development, as well as disease pathogenesis, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment.

转基因小鼠模型:好的、坏的和丑陋的。
小鼠的靶向基因破坏是为人类发育和疾病建立小鼠模型的有力工具。虽然人类基因组计划已经帮助产生了许多候选基因,但很少有基因被描述为其精确的体内功能。基因靶向已经对我们描述这些基因的功能角色的能力产生了巨大的影响。许多基因敲除小鼠模型忠实地模拟了人类疾病的表型。由于一些模型显示出意想不到的或没有表型,对基因靶向策略的价值产生了争议。我们支持基因靶向策略,只要谨慎使用,特别是在解释颅面和口腔生物学中的表型时,许多基因具有多效性作用。在将不同的治疗策略引入临床之前,开发和测试不同治疗策略的独特机会超过了潜在的陷阱。在未来,我们相信基因工程动物模型将是获得重要见解的分子机制潜在的发展,以及疾病的发病机制,诊断,预防和治疗不可或缺的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信