Amniotic fluid embolus: A review of the research literature

RM. RN. PHD. Kathleen Fahy
{"title":"Amniotic fluid embolus: A review of the research literature","authors":"RM. RN. PHD. Kathleen Fahy","doi":"10.1016/S1445-4386(01)80029-X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The diagnosis of Amniotic Fluid Embolus (AFE) is often missed clinically leading to the incorrect attribution of a major post-partum haemorrhage, which may accompany AFE, to uterine atony. This paper reviews the research on AFE with particular emphasis on the clinical presentation and diagnosis; both before and after death. It begins by dealing with the difficulty of defining AFE due to confusion about the underlying pathophysiological events. As this paper will demonstrate, the theory that AFE is an embolic event is no longer valid. A description of the clinical manifestations is provided so that these can be explained by the contemporary theory of AFE as an ‘anaphylactoid’ reaction. Finally, the difficulties of diagnosis, particularly laboratory diagnosis, will be discussed. The research indicates that it is not possible to accurately diagnose AFE, either, pre or post mortem, by any currently available laboratory tests. Because of better diagnosis it is now known that AFE in not uncommon and, if it is diagnosed early, a much higher rate of intact survival can be achieved than was previously thought possible.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":83630,"journal":{"name":"Australian journal of midwifery : professional journal of the Australian College of Midwives Incorporated","volume":"14 1","pages":"Pages 9-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1445-4386(01)80029-X","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian journal of midwifery : professional journal of the Australian College of Midwives Incorporated","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S144543860180029X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2006/4/3 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

The diagnosis of Amniotic Fluid Embolus (AFE) is often missed clinically leading to the incorrect attribution of a major post-partum haemorrhage, which may accompany AFE, to uterine atony. This paper reviews the research on AFE with particular emphasis on the clinical presentation and diagnosis; both before and after death. It begins by dealing with the difficulty of defining AFE due to confusion about the underlying pathophysiological events. As this paper will demonstrate, the theory that AFE is an embolic event is no longer valid. A description of the clinical manifestations is provided so that these can be explained by the contemporary theory of AFE as an ‘anaphylactoid’ reaction. Finally, the difficulties of diagnosis, particularly laboratory diagnosis, will be discussed. The research indicates that it is not possible to accurately diagnose AFE, either, pre or post mortem, by any currently available laboratory tests. Because of better diagnosis it is now known that AFE in not uncommon and, if it is diagnosed early, a much higher rate of intact survival can be achieved than was previously thought possible.

羊水栓子:研究文献综述
羊水栓塞(AFE)的诊断在临床上经常被遗漏,导致不正确地将可能伴随AFE的产后大出血归因于子宫张力。本文就AFE的临床表现和诊断作一综述;死前死后都有它首先处理由于对潜在病理生理事件的混淆而难以定义AFE的问题。正如本文将证明的那样,AFE是栓塞事件的理论不再有效。本文提供了临床表现的描述,以便这些可以用AFE的当代理论解释为“类过敏”反应。最后,将讨论诊断的困难,特别是实验室诊断。研究表明,目前任何可用的实验室检测都不可能准确诊断AFE,无论是在死前还是死后。由于更好的诊断,现在知道AFE并不罕见,如果早期诊断,完整存活率可以比以前认为的要高得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书