Epidural ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in Taiwanese patients.

Acta anaesthesiologica Sinica Pub Date : 2003-03-01
Wai-Keung Lee, Chun-Hsuan Li, Lim-Shen Lee, Chung-Fai Au, Kwong-Leung Yu, Chao-Shun Tang
{"title":"Epidural ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia in Taiwanese patients.","authors":"Wai-Keung Lee,&nbsp;Chun-Hsuan Li,&nbsp;Lim-Shen Lee,&nbsp;Chung-Fai Au,&nbsp;Kwong-Leung Yu,&nbsp;Chao-Shun Tang","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Ropivacaine is the latest long-acting amide local anesthetic. As it is less cardiovasculotoxic and neurotoxic than bupivacaine it is an attractive anesthetic agent used in clinical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. This study was undertaken to seek for a suitable dosage of ropivacaine in postoperative analgesia for Taiwanese patients whose average physicality is not entirely compatible with the pharmacopeially recommended dosage for western people.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>For assessment of epidural ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia 105 adult patients were enrolled and randomly allotted to three groups. Patients in Group A were given epidurally 0.15% ropivacaine, while those in Group B and Group C were given 0.125% and 0.10% ropivacaine respectively. Pain was evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS) and modified Bromage scale, and adverse effects were recorded at the designated points of time during the postoperative 24-hour period.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The demographic profiles were comparable among three groups. In VAS score, Group A (3.20 +/- 0.47) and B (3.11 +/- 0.41) did not differ much, while Group C (3.97 +/- 0.71) the score was signally higher than Group A and Group B (P < 0.05). Adverse effects, such as paraesthesia, nausea and urinary retention were observed more in Group A.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>From the results of this study, we are of the opinion that 0.125% ropivacaine could provide a postoperative analgesia in Taiwanese patients to their satisfaction with less adverse effects.</p>","PeriodicalId":79312,"journal":{"name":"Acta anaesthesiologica Sinica","volume":"41 1","pages":"21-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta anaesthesiologica Sinica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Ropivacaine is the latest long-acting amide local anesthetic. As it is less cardiovasculotoxic and neurotoxic than bupivacaine it is an attractive anesthetic agent used in clinical anesthesia and postoperative analgesia. This study was undertaken to seek for a suitable dosage of ropivacaine in postoperative analgesia for Taiwanese patients whose average physicality is not entirely compatible with the pharmacopeially recommended dosage for western people.

Methods: For assessment of epidural ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia 105 adult patients were enrolled and randomly allotted to three groups. Patients in Group A were given epidurally 0.15% ropivacaine, while those in Group B and Group C were given 0.125% and 0.10% ropivacaine respectively. Pain was evaluated with visual analogue scale (VAS) and modified Bromage scale, and adverse effects were recorded at the designated points of time during the postoperative 24-hour period.

Results: The demographic profiles were comparable among three groups. In VAS score, Group A (3.20 +/- 0.47) and B (3.11 +/- 0.41) did not differ much, while Group C (3.97 +/- 0.71) the score was signally higher than Group A and Group B (P < 0.05). Adverse effects, such as paraesthesia, nausea and urinary retention were observed more in Group A.

Conclusions: From the results of this study, we are of the opinion that 0.125% ropivacaine could provide a postoperative analgesia in Taiwanese patients to their satisfaction with less adverse effects.

硬膜外罗哌卡因在台湾病人术后镇痛中的应用。
背景:罗哌卡因是最新的长效酰胺局麻药。由于它的心血管毒性和神经毒性比布比卡因小,因此它是一种有吸引力的麻醉剂,用于临床麻醉和术后镇痛。本研究的目的是为台湾患者的平均体格与西方药典推荐剂量不完全一致,寻求合适的罗哌卡因术后镇痛剂量。方法:选取成人患者105例,随机分为3组,评价硬膜外罗哌卡因用于术后镇痛的效果。A组患者硬膜外给予0.15%罗哌卡因,B组和C组患者分别给予0.125%和0.10%罗哌卡因。采用视觉模拟评分法(VAS)和改良Bromage评分法评估疼痛,并在术后24小时内的指定时间点记录不良反应。结果:三组患者的人口学特征具有可比性。VAS评分A组(3.20 +/- 0.47)、B组(3.11 +/- 0.41)差异无显著性意义,C组(3.97 +/- 0.71)显著高于A、B组(P < 0.05)。结论:从本研究结果来看,我们认为0.125%的罗哌卡因可以为台湾患者提供满意的术后镇痛,且不良反应较小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信