What happens when health care providers ask about intimate partner violence? A description of consequences from the perspectives of female survivors.

Judy C Chang, Michele Decker, Kathryn E Moracco, Sandra L Martin, Ruth Petersen, Pamela Y Frasier
{"title":"What happens when health care providers ask about intimate partner violence? A description of consequences from the perspectives of female survivors.","authors":"Judy C Chang,&nbsp;Michele Decker,&nbsp;Kathryn E Moracco,&nbsp;Sandra L Martin,&nbsp;Ruth Petersen,&nbsp;Pamela Y Frasier","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To describe positive and negative consequences of health care screening for intimate partner violence from the perspectives of female survivors.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted 7 semistructured focus group interviews with 41 women in battered women's shelters or intimate partner violence support groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Positive consequences of screening included: recognizing that the violence was a problem, decreased isolation, and feeling that the medical provider cared. Negative consequences included: feeling judged by the provider, increased anxiety about the unknown, feeling that the intervention protocol was cumbersome or intrusive, and disappointment in the provider's response.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We found that both positive and negative consequences can result from screening for intimate partner violence and that they are related to provider behavior. The positive consequences described by the participants reflect changes in their attitudes, thoughts, and feelings that may precede help seeking. A better understanding of consequences can help providers tailor screening approaches and interventions for intimate partner violence.</p>","PeriodicalId":76028,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Women's Association (1972)","volume":"58 2","pages":"76-81"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Women's Association (1972)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To describe positive and negative consequences of health care screening for intimate partner violence from the perspectives of female survivors.

Method: We conducted 7 semistructured focus group interviews with 41 women in battered women's shelters or intimate partner violence support groups.

Results: Positive consequences of screening included: recognizing that the violence was a problem, decreased isolation, and feeling that the medical provider cared. Negative consequences included: feeling judged by the provider, increased anxiety about the unknown, feeling that the intervention protocol was cumbersome or intrusive, and disappointment in the provider's response.

Conclusion: We found that both positive and negative consequences can result from screening for intimate partner violence and that they are related to provider behavior. The positive consequences described by the participants reflect changes in their attitudes, thoughts, and feelings that may precede help seeking. A better understanding of consequences can help providers tailor screening approaches and interventions for intimate partner violence.

当卫生保健提供者询问亲密伴侣暴力时,会发生什么?从女性幸存者的角度描述后果。
目的:从女性幸存者的角度描述医疗保健筛查对亲密伴侣暴力的积极和消极影响。方法:对41名受虐妇女收容所或亲密伴侣暴力支持小组的妇女进行了7次半结构化焦点小组访谈。结果:筛查的积极结果包括:认识到暴力是一个问题,减少孤立,并感到医疗提供者关心。负面后果包括:感觉被提供者评判,对未知的焦虑增加,感觉干预协议繁琐或侵入性,以及对提供者的反应失望。结论:我们发现亲密伴侣暴力筛查的积极和消极后果都与提供者的行为有关。参与者描述的积极结果反映了他们的态度、思想和感觉的变化,这些变化可能先于寻求帮助。更好地了解后果可以帮助提供者为亲密伴侣暴力量身定制筛查方法和干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信