Population impact of strategies designed to reduce peptic ulcer risks associated with NSAID use.

Michael Langman
{"title":"Population impact of strategies designed to reduce peptic ulcer risks associated with NSAID use.","authors":"Michael Langman","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The risk of ulcer complications rises steeply with dose for aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) but estimates of the overall incidence of bleeding ulcer are unreliable. Drug utilisation data, epidemiological data on the frequency of bleeding ulcer and death, and the relative risks associated with different NSAIDs, indicate that the number of cases of bleeding ulcer attributable to NSAIDs in the United Kingdom is approximately 2,400. Substitution of ibuprofen at a dose of 2.4 g/day for all other NSAIDs would reduce the number of events attributable to NSAIDs from 2,431 to 695 annually. At a dose of 1200 mg/day, substituting ibuprofen or another safe NSAID would be likely to reduce events to zero. Similarly, substitution of ibuprofen 2.4 g/day for all other NSAIDs would reduce attributable ulcer mortality to 80. The total number of excess cases attributable to aspirin is 753 annually. If prophylactic aspirin was prescribed solely at a dose of 75 mg/day, the number of cases would fall to 445 annually and the number of related deaths from 87 to 51 annually. NSAIDs and aspirin account for approximately one-third and previous ulcer for about one-fifth of the overall risk of bleeding ulcer and its complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":73436,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The risk of ulcer complications rises steeply with dose for aspirin and other non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) but estimates of the overall incidence of bleeding ulcer are unreliable. Drug utilisation data, epidemiological data on the frequency of bleeding ulcer and death, and the relative risks associated with different NSAIDs, indicate that the number of cases of bleeding ulcer attributable to NSAIDs in the United Kingdom is approximately 2,400. Substitution of ibuprofen at a dose of 2.4 g/day for all other NSAIDs would reduce the number of events attributable to NSAIDs from 2,431 to 695 annually. At a dose of 1200 mg/day, substituting ibuprofen or another safe NSAID would be likely to reduce events to zero. Similarly, substitution of ibuprofen 2.4 g/day for all other NSAIDs would reduce attributable ulcer mortality to 80. The total number of excess cases attributable to aspirin is 753 annually. If prophylactic aspirin was prescribed solely at a dose of 75 mg/day, the number of cases would fall to 445 annually and the number of related deaths from 87 to 51 annually. NSAIDs and aspirin account for approximately one-third and previous ulcer for about one-fifth of the overall risk of bleeding ulcer and its complications.

减少与使用非甾体抗炎药相关的消化性溃疡风险策略的人群影响
随着阿司匹林和其他非甾体抗炎药(NSAIDs)的剂量增加,溃疡并发症的风险急剧上升,但对出血性溃疡总发生率的估计是不可靠的。药物使用数据、出血性溃疡和死亡频率的流行病学数据以及与不同非甾体抗炎药相关的相对风险表明,在联合王国,由非甾体抗炎药引起的出血性溃疡病例约为2400例。以2.4 g/天的剂量布洛芬替代所有其他非甾体抗炎药,可将每年由非甾体抗炎药引起的事件数量从2431例减少到695例。在1200mg /天的剂量下,替代布洛芬或另一种安全的非甾体抗炎药可能会将事件减少到零。同样,用2.4 g/天的布洛芬替代所有其他非甾体抗炎药可将溃疡死亡率降低到80。每年可归因于阿司匹林的超额病例总数为753例。如果预防性阿司匹林的处方剂量仅为75毫克/天,每年的病例数将降至445例,相关死亡人数将从每年87例降至51例。非甾体抗炎药和阿司匹林约占出血性溃疡及其并发症总风险的三分之一,既往溃疡约占五分之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信