Establishing the validity, reliability, and sensitivity of NOC in an adult care nurse practitioner setting.

Outcomes management Pub Date : 2003-04-01

Gail Keenan, Violet Barkauskas, Julia Stocker, Marion Johnson, Meridean Maas, Sue Moorhead, David Reed

引用次数: 0

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to provide evidence of the inter-rater reliability, validity, and sensitivity of a subset of Nursing Outcomes Classification (NOC) measures, including 26 found to be "most clinically useful" in a nurse practitioner setting (NPS). Selected NPS results are compared to those obtained from a larger 10-site study. Results indicated that the measures are valid, reliable, and sensitive as clinical measures of nursing outcomes. Proper education of users can enhance psychometrics. Suggestions for strengthening the measures and further study are outlined.

本刊更多论文

在成人护理护士执业环境中建立NOC的效度、信度和敏感性。

本研究的目的是为护理结果分类(NOC)措施子集的评分间信度、效度和敏感性提供证据，其中包括在护士执业环境(NPS)中发现的26项“临床最有用”的措施。将选定的NPS结果与从更大的10个站点的研究中获得的结果进行比较。结果表明，该指标作为临床护理效果的指标是有效、可靠、灵敏的。对用户进行适当的教育可以增强心理测量学。提出了加强措施和进一步研究的建议。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Outcomes management

自引率

0.00%

发文量