[Laparoscopic fundoplication--what is proven?].

H J Stein
{"title":"[Laparoscopic fundoplication--what is proven?].","authors":"H J Stein","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Laparoscopic fundoplication has become a popular procedure but several questions remain unresolved. Although randomised trials suggest that antireflux surgery is a good alternative to continuous medical therapy, the selection of patients for surgery remains crucial to achieve success. There is currently no proof that antireflux surgery will reduce the risk for developing esophageal adenocarcinoma. Complications, side effects and failures appear to be higher after a laparoscopic approach as compared to conventional open surgery, particularly in un-experienced hands. Partial fundoplications and tailored approaches have so far not shown convincingly better results than those that can be achieved by short and floppy 360 fundoplication.</p>","PeriodicalId":81771,"journal":{"name":"Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress","volume":"119 ","pages":"184-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kongressband. Deutsche Gesellschaft fur Chirurgie. Kongress","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Laparoscopic fundoplication has become a popular procedure but several questions remain unresolved. Although randomised trials suggest that antireflux surgery is a good alternative to continuous medical therapy, the selection of patients for surgery remains crucial to achieve success. There is currently no proof that antireflux surgery will reduce the risk for developing esophageal adenocarcinoma. Complications, side effects and failures appear to be higher after a laparoscopic approach as compared to conventional open surgery, particularly in un-experienced hands. Partial fundoplications and tailored approaches have so far not shown convincingly better results than those that can be achieved by short and floppy 360 fundoplication.

[腹腔镜下眼底复制术——证明了什么?]
腹腔镜下翻底术已成为一种流行的手术,但仍有几个问题尚未解决。尽管随机试验表明,抗反流手术是持续药物治疗的一个很好的替代方案,但手术患者的选择仍然是取得成功的关键。目前还没有证据表明抗反流手术会降低患食管腺癌的风险。与传统的开放手术相比,腹腔镜手术的并发症、副作用和失败似乎更高,特别是在没有经验的患者中。到目前为止,局部复底和量身定制的方法并没有显示出令人信服的效果,而短而软的360度复底可以取得更好的效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信