Multiple-cause coding of death from myocardial infarction: population-based study of trends in death certificate data.

Michael J Goldacre, Stephen E Roberts, Myfanwy Griffith
{"title":"Multiple-cause coding of death from myocardial infarction: population-based study of trends in death certificate data.","authors":"Michael J Goldacre,&nbsp;Stephen E Roberts,&nbsp;Myfanwy Griffith","doi":"10.1093/pubmed/fdg014","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Data on long-term trends in mortality are generally unavailable for multiple-cause coding of deaths. We wanted to know whether multiple-cause coding of deaths for myocardial infarction contributes much to the interpretation of death certificate data on mortality rates for this condition.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We analysed all causes of death on death certificates in the former Oxford health service region from 1979 to 1998.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 69,333 death certificates that included myocardial infarction as a cause of death, it was the underlying cause of death in 93.6 per cent. The ratio of 'mentions' to 'underlying cause' was broadly similar over the study period, during which time there were substantial falls in mortality rates. There were significant changes to the ratios, associated with timing of changes to coding rules; but their effects were small. The ratio of mentions to underlying cause was similar in men and women and in different age groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The underlying cause of death was a robust and almost complete measure of certified deaths for myocardial infarction.</p>","PeriodicalId":77224,"journal":{"name":"Journal of public health medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1093/pubmed/fdg014","citationCount":"17","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of public health medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/pubmed/fdg014","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 17

Abstract

Background: Data on long-term trends in mortality are generally unavailable for multiple-cause coding of deaths. We wanted to know whether multiple-cause coding of deaths for myocardial infarction contributes much to the interpretation of death certificate data on mortality rates for this condition.

Methods: We analysed all causes of death on death certificates in the former Oxford health service region from 1979 to 1998.

Results: Of 69,333 death certificates that included myocardial infarction as a cause of death, it was the underlying cause of death in 93.6 per cent. The ratio of 'mentions' to 'underlying cause' was broadly similar over the study period, during which time there were substantial falls in mortality rates. There were significant changes to the ratios, associated with timing of changes to coding rules; but their effects were small. The ratio of mentions to underlying cause was similar in men and women and in different age groups.

Conclusion: The underlying cause of death was a robust and almost complete measure of certified deaths for myocardial infarction.

心肌梗死死亡的多原因编码:基于人群的死亡证明数据趋势研究
背景:通常无法获得死亡率长期趋势的多原因死亡编码数据。我们想知道心肌梗死死亡的多原因编码是否有助于解释这种情况下死亡率的死亡证明数据。方法:对原牛津卫生服务区1979 ~ 1998年死亡证明上的所有死因进行分析。结果:在69,333份死亡证明中,心肌梗死作为死亡原因,其中93.6%是潜在死亡原因。在研究期间,“提及”与“潜在原因”的比例大致相似,在此期间死亡率大幅下降。这些比率有显著的变化,与编码规则变化的时间有关;但它们的影响很小。在男性和女性以及不同年龄组中,提及潜在原因的比例相似。结论:潜在的死亡原因是一个可靠的和几乎完整的测量心肌梗死证实死亡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信