Discussing wisdom teeth with patients: a critique of information materials.

Health bulletin Pub Date : 2001-05-01
M O'Donnell, V Entwistle, C Deery
{"title":"Discussing wisdom teeth with patients: a critique of information materials.","authors":"M O'Donnell,&nbsp;V Entwistle,&nbsp;C Deery","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess the quality of information leaflets about third molar extraction.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Quality assessment of information leaflets about third molar extraction. We focused particularly on the extent to which they reflect current research evidence.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>All fifteen oral and maxillofacial surgery departments in Scotland were asked to provide copies of existing patient information materials on third molar surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Six different leaflets were assessed. Most were apparently intended for people who were about to undergo and/or had just undergone the procedure rather than for people facing decisions about extraction. The leaflets appeared to reflect varying policies about third molar extraction and some of the information provided did not reflect current research evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>There is currently a lack of good quality information materials available to people who are considering third molar extraction. It is likely that there are also problems with the quality of other patient information leaflets. Health care professionals need to review the quality of patient information leaflets to ensure that the information provided reflects current research evidence.</p>","PeriodicalId":75896,"journal":{"name":"Health bulletin","volume":"59 3","pages":"171-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To assess the quality of information leaflets about third molar extraction.

Design: Quality assessment of information leaflets about third molar extraction. We focused particularly on the extent to which they reflect current research evidence.

Setting: All fifteen oral and maxillofacial surgery departments in Scotland were asked to provide copies of existing patient information materials on third molar surgery.

Results: Six different leaflets were assessed. Most were apparently intended for people who were about to undergo and/or had just undergone the procedure rather than for people facing decisions about extraction. The leaflets appeared to reflect varying policies about third molar extraction and some of the information provided did not reflect current research evidence.

Conclusions: There is currently a lack of good quality information materials available to people who are considering third molar extraction. It is likely that there are also problems with the quality of other patient information leaflets. Health care professionals need to review the quality of patient information leaflets to ensure that the information provided reflects current research evidence.

与患者讨论智齿:对信息材料的批判。
目的:评价第三磨牙拔牙资料单张的质量。设计:第三磨牙抽提资料单张的质量评价。我们特别关注它们在多大程度上反映了当前的研究证据。背景:苏格兰所有15个口腔颌面外科部门被要求提供现有第三磨牙手术患者信息材料的副本。结果:评估了6种不同的小叶。大多数显然是为即将接受和/或刚刚接受手术的人准备的,而不是为面临拔牙决定的人准备的。传单似乎反映了关于第三磨牙提取的不同政策,提供的一些信息没有反映当前的研究证据。结论:目前缺乏高质量的信息材料,可用于考虑第三磨牙拔牙的人。其他患者信息传单的质量也可能存在问题。卫生保健专业人员需要审查患者信息传单的质量,以确保所提供的信息反映当前的研究证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书