Audit and non-principals: reported experiences in general practice.

Health bulletin Pub Date : 2001-09-01
P Bowie, A Garvie, J Oliver
{"title":"Audit and non-principals: reported experiences in general practice.","authors":"P Bowie,&nbsp;A Garvie,&nbsp;J Oliver","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine respondents reported levels of exposure to audit during their medical career and as a general practice non-principal. To assess and identify audit education and training needs.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Postal questionnaire survey.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>The West of Scotland.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Two hundred GP non-principals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A response rate of 79% was achieved. The mean age of respondents was 35 years and 121 (77%) were female. One hundred and thirty respondents (83%) reported involvement in three or less audit projects during a mean career length of 12.1 years. Of 378 audit projects claimed to have been undertaken, 287 (76%) involved setting measurable standards, and 181 (48%) failed to be completed. One hundred and six respondents (68%) had yet to take part in audit during their time as a non-principal (median length of time was 1 year). Thirty nine respondents (25%) were currently involved in an on-going audit project. One hundred and twelve (71%) claimed that they were not expected to participate in audit as part of their current or previous non-principal post. One hundred and one respondents (64%) indicated that they require further education and training in audit method.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Non-principals' experience of audit and exposure to it are poor. Many lack knowledge of audit method and appear to be uninvolved in audit and excluded from local audit programmes. Integration into the primary care team, access to a co-ordinated programme of audit and training in audit method are required. Otherwise non-principals may continue to struggle with the audit demands of clinical governance and impending revalidation.</p>","PeriodicalId":75896,"journal":{"name":"Health bulletin","volume":"59 5","pages":"335-9"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To determine respondents reported levels of exposure to audit during their medical career and as a general practice non-principal. To assess and identify audit education and training needs.

Design: Postal questionnaire survey.

Setting: The West of Scotland.

Subjects: Two hundred GP non-principals.

Results: A response rate of 79% was achieved. The mean age of respondents was 35 years and 121 (77%) were female. One hundred and thirty respondents (83%) reported involvement in three or less audit projects during a mean career length of 12.1 years. Of 378 audit projects claimed to have been undertaken, 287 (76%) involved setting measurable standards, and 181 (48%) failed to be completed. One hundred and six respondents (68%) had yet to take part in audit during their time as a non-principal (median length of time was 1 year). Thirty nine respondents (25%) were currently involved in an on-going audit project. One hundred and twelve (71%) claimed that they were not expected to participate in audit as part of their current or previous non-principal post. One hundred and one respondents (64%) indicated that they require further education and training in audit method.

Conclusions: Non-principals' experience of audit and exposure to it are poor. Many lack knowledge of audit method and appear to be uninvolved in audit and excluded from local audit programmes. Integration into the primary care team, access to a co-ordinated programme of audit and training in audit method are required. Otherwise non-principals may continue to struggle with the audit demands of clinical governance and impending revalidation.

审计和非负责人:报告的一般实践经验。
目的:确定受访者在其医疗生涯和作为一般执业非主要人员期间报告的审计暴露水平。评估和识别审计教育和培训需求。设计:邮政问卷调查。环境:苏格兰西部。对象:200名GP非校长。结果:有效率为79%。受访者的平均年龄为35岁,女性121人(77%)。130名受访者(83%)在平均12.1年的职业生涯中参与了3个或更少的审计项目。在378个审计项目中,287个(76%)涉及制定可衡量的标准,181个(48%)未能完成。106名受访者(68%)在担任非负责人期间(时间中位数为1年)尚未参加审计。39名受访者(25%)目前正在参与正在进行的审计项目。112人(71%)声称他们在目前或以前的非主要职位上不希望参与审计。101名受访者(64%)表示他们需要进一步的审计方法教育和培训。结论:非校长的审计经验和对审计的了解程度较差。许多缺乏审计方法的知识,似乎不参与审计,被排除在地方审计方案之外。需要融入初级保健团队,获得协调的审计方案和审计方法培训。否则,非校长可能会继续与临床治理的审计要求和即将到来的重新验证作斗争。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书