Buprenorphine TDS: use in daily practice, benefits for patients.

Lukas Radbruch
{"title":"Buprenorphine TDS: use in daily practice, benefits for patients.","authors":"Lukas Radbruch","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In Germany and many other countries, buprenorphine has been used for a long time for the management of pain in both cancer and non-cancer patients. Although a transdermal delivery system for buprenorphine (Transtec) has recently been introduced, the clinical experience in daily practice with this drug, delivered in a matrix patch, is only now being evaluated. In preliminary data from a survey of 3,255 patients with chronic pain, 26% had cancer pain, while the most common diagnoses of the other respondents included back pain (33%), osteoarthritis (22%), osteoporosis (17%), and neuropathic pain (10%, multiple entries). Before being switched to the buprenorphine patch, most patients had been pretreated with World Health Organization (WHO) Step II opioids (47%) or WHO Step III opioids (18%), including tramadol (in 35% of patients) and a tilidin/naloxone combination (15%); 9% had not been prescribed any opioids in advance of receiving transdermal buprenorphine. Most patients (77%) in the survey had been started on the lowest dose of the buprenorphine patch (35 microg/h), and nearly half (49%) were placed on adjuvant analgesics, including tramadol or tilidin/naloxone. Pain relief was rated as good or very good by 81% of the respondents. Adverse effects were similar to those seen on other opioids, although their intensity was mild in most cases. Local side effects, including erythema (4% of cases) and pruritus (1%), were transitory. Based on the survey results, transdermal buprenorphine is considered an effective opioid treatment for patients with stable cancer and non-cancer pain; it may prove particularly useful in patients who have experienced side effects taking oral analgesic preparations, as well as in those who are taking extensive co-medications.</p>","PeriodicalId":73436,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical practice. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In Germany and many other countries, buprenorphine has been used for a long time for the management of pain in both cancer and non-cancer patients. Although a transdermal delivery system for buprenorphine (Transtec) has recently been introduced, the clinical experience in daily practice with this drug, delivered in a matrix patch, is only now being evaluated. In preliminary data from a survey of 3,255 patients with chronic pain, 26% had cancer pain, while the most common diagnoses of the other respondents included back pain (33%), osteoarthritis (22%), osteoporosis (17%), and neuropathic pain (10%, multiple entries). Before being switched to the buprenorphine patch, most patients had been pretreated with World Health Organization (WHO) Step II opioids (47%) or WHO Step III opioids (18%), including tramadol (in 35% of patients) and a tilidin/naloxone combination (15%); 9% had not been prescribed any opioids in advance of receiving transdermal buprenorphine. Most patients (77%) in the survey had been started on the lowest dose of the buprenorphine patch (35 microg/h), and nearly half (49%) were placed on adjuvant analgesics, including tramadol or tilidin/naloxone. Pain relief was rated as good or very good by 81% of the respondents. Adverse effects were similar to those seen on other opioids, although their intensity was mild in most cases. Local side effects, including erythema (4% of cases) and pruritus (1%), were transitory. Based on the survey results, transdermal buprenorphine is considered an effective opioid treatment for patients with stable cancer and non-cancer pain; it may prove particularly useful in patients who have experienced side effects taking oral analgesic preparations, as well as in those who are taking extensive co-medications.

丁丙诺啡TDS:在日常实践中使用,对患者有益。
在德国和许多其他国家,丁丙诺啡长期用于癌症和非癌症患者的疼痛管理。虽然最近引入了丁丙诺啡(Transtec)的经皮给药系统,但这种药物在日常实践中的临床经验(以基质贴片的形式给药)现在才开始评估。在对3255名慢性疼痛患者的初步调查数据中,26%患有癌症疼痛,而其他受访者最常见的诊断包括背痛(33%),骨关节炎(22%),骨质疏松症(17%)和神经性疼痛(10%,多次输入)。在切换到丁丙诺啡贴片之前,大多数患者已经接受了世界卫生组织(WHO)第II步阿片类药物(47%)或WHO第III步阿片类药物(18%)的预处理,包括曲马多(35%的患者)和利丁/纳洛酮联合治疗(15%);9%的患者在接受丁丙诺啡透皮治疗前未开过阿片类药物处方。在调查中,大多数患者(77%)开始使用最低剂量的丁丙诺啡贴片(35微克/小时),近一半(49%)使用辅助镇痛药,包括曲马多或利丁/纳洛酮。81%的受访者认为疼痛缓解良好或非常好。副作用与其他阿片类药物相似,尽管在大多数情况下其强度较轻。局部副作用,包括红斑(4%的病例)和瘙痒(1%),是短暂的。根据调查结果,经皮丁丙诺啡被认为是一种有效的阿片类药物治疗稳定的癌症和非癌症疼痛患者;对于服用口服镇痛制剂有副作用的患者,以及正在服用广泛联合药物的患者,它可能特别有用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信