A unitary patient record improves admission documentation in a medical assessment unit in a major teaching hospital.

Health bulletin Pub Date : 2001-07-01
L G Morrison, S Lam, M Sutherland, K Kefala, T Morse, D Bell
{"title":"A unitary patient record improves admission documentation in a medical assessment unit in a major teaching hospital.","authors":"L G Morrison,&nbsp;S Lam,&nbsp;M Sutherland,&nbsp;K Kefala,&nbsp;T Morse,&nbsp;D Bell","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To ascertain the impact of the introduction of a unitary patient record (UPR) on clerking documentation of emergency medical admissions.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective casenote audit.</p><p><strong>Subjects and setting: </strong>Random sample of 100 unselected admissions to the medical assessment unit of a major teaching hospital, comprising two groups pre- and post-introduction of the UPR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Statistically significant improvements in the documentation of several items were achieved; function before episode, ethnic origin, chest pain, breathlessness, ankle oedema, cough, bowel habit and locomotor symptoms and recording of blood pressure and peripheral pulses. There were trends towards improvement in other areas and there were no areas in which the UPR performed less well than standard documentation.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Introduction of the UPR represents the successful application of multidisciplinary principles to over 10,000 acute general medical admissions. It has improved some, but not all, aspects of documentation. Revision of the design of the UPR should lead to further progress, as part of an ongoing process of development and re-audit.</p>","PeriodicalId":75896,"journal":{"name":"Health bulletin","volume":"59 4","pages":"218-23"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: To ascertain the impact of the introduction of a unitary patient record (UPR) on clerking documentation of emergency medical admissions.

Design: Retrospective casenote audit.

Subjects and setting: Random sample of 100 unselected admissions to the medical assessment unit of a major teaching hospital, comprising two groups pre- and post-introduction of the UPR.

Results: Statistically significant improvements in the documentation of several items were achieved; function before episode, ethnic origin, chest pain, breathlessness, ankle oedema, cough, bowel habit and locomotor symptoms and recording of blood pressure and peripheral pulses. There were trends towards improvement in other areas and there were no areas in which the UPR performed less well than standard documentation.

Conclusions: Introduction of the UPR represents the successful application of multidisciplinary principles to over 10,000 acute general medical admissions. It has improved some, but not all, aspects of documentation. Revision of the design of the UPR should lead to further progress, as part of an ongoing process of development and re-audit.

统一的病人记录改善了大型教学医院医疗评估部门的入院记录。
目的:探讨统一病案(UPR)的引入对急诊住院人员文书编制的影响。设计:回顾性案例审核。研究对象和环境:随机抽取一家大型教学医院医疗评估部门的100名未经选择的入院人员,包括引入普遍定期审议之前和之后的两组。结果:在几个项目的记录方面取得了统计学上显著的改善;发作前的功能、民族、胸痛、呼吸困难、踝关节水肿、咳嗽、排便习惯和运动症状,并记录血压和外周脉搏。在其他领域也有改进的趋势,普遍定期审议在任何领域的表现都不低于标准文件。结论:普遍定期审议的引入代表了将多学科原则成功应用于1万多名急性病住院患者。它改进了文档的某些方面,但不是全部。修订普遍定期审议的设计应导致进一步的进展,作为正在进行的发展和重新审计进程的一部分。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书