Evaluation of prognostic factors following flow-cytometric DNA analysis after cytokeratin labelling: II. Cervical and endometrial cancer.

Pauline Wimberger, Peter Hillemanns, Thomas Kapsner, Hermann Hepp, Rainer Kimmig
{"title":"Evaluation of prognostic factors following flow-cytometric DNA analysis after cytokeratin labelling: II. Cervical and endometrial cancer.","authors":"Pauline Wimberger,&nbsp;Peter Hillemanns,&nbsp;Thomas Kapsner,&nbsp;Hermann Hepp,&nbsp;Rainer Kimmig","doi":"10.1155/2002/346969","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>In gynecologic oncology valid prognostic factors are necessary to define biologically similar subgroups for analysis of therapeutic efficacy. This study is the first published prospective study concerning prognostic significance of DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction in cervical and endometrial cancer following enrichment of tumor cells by cytokeratin labelling. Epithelial cells were labeled by FITC-conjugated cytokeratin antibody (CK 5, 6, 8, and CK 17) prior to flow cytometric cell cycle analysis in 91 specimens of cervical cancer and 73 samples of endometrial cancer. In cervical cancer neither DNA-ploidy nor S-phase fraction were relevant prognostic parameters. But CV of the G(0)G(1)-peak showed prognostic relevance in cervical cancer cells, even in multivariate analysis. This interesting observation, however, seems to have no therapeutic consequence due to the small discrimination capacity of CV. In endometrial carcinoma, gross DNA-aneuploidy (DNA-index > 1.3) and a high percentage of proliferating cells (>75th percentile) were univariate and multivariate highly significant prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival. Especially DNA-aneuploidy (DI>1.3) is one of the most important independent molecular biological prognostic factors. While diagnostic curettage we could identify risk patients even preoperatively by determination of the prognostic factors like histologic tumor type, grading, cervical involvement and DNA-ploidy. Thereby these patients could be treated primarily in an oncologic center. In conclusion, our investigations showed that the determination of DNA-ploidy should be done in endometrial carcinoma. In cervical cancer no clinical significance for determination of DNA-parameters was found.</p>","PeriodicalId":76996,"journal":{"name":"Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology","volume":"24 4-5","pages":"147-58"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1155/2002/346969","citationCount":"18","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Analytical cellular pathology : the journal of the European Society for Analytical Cellular Pathology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1155/2002/346969","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 18

Abstract

In gynecologic oncology valid prognostic factors are necessary to define biologically similar subgroups for analysis of therapeutic efficacy. This study is the first published prospective study concerning prognostic significance of DNA ploidy and S-phase fraction in cervical and endometrial cancer following enrichment of tumor cells by cytokeratin labelling. Epithelial cells were labeled by FITC-conjugated cytokeratin antibody (CK 5, 6, 8, and CK 17) prior to flow cytometric cell cycle analysis in 91 specimens of cervical cancer and 73 samples of endometrial cancer. In cervical cancer neither DNA-ploidy nor S-phase fraction were relevant prognostic parameters. But CV of the G(0)G(1)-peak showed prognostic relevance in cervical cancer cells, even in multivariate analysis. This interesting observation, however, seems to have no therapeutic consequence due to the small discrimination capacity of CV. In endometrial carcinoma, gross DNA-aneuploidy (DNA-index > 1.3) and a high percentage of proliferating cells (>75th percentile) were univariate and multivariate highly significant prognostic factors for recurrence-free survival. Especially DNA-aneuploidy (DI>1.3) is one of the most important independent molecular biological prognostic factors. While diagnostic curettage we could identify risk patients even preoperatively by determination of the prognostic factors like histologic tumor type, grading, cervical involvement and DNA-ploidy. Thereby these patients could be treated primarily in an oncologic center. In conclusion, our investigations showed that the determination of DNA-ploidy should be done in endometrial carcinoma. In cervical cancer no clinical significance for determination of DNA-parameters was found.

细胞角蛋白标记后流式细胞DNA分析的预后因素评估:子宫颈癌和子宫内膜癌。
在妇科肿瘤学中,有效的预后因素是必要的,以确定生物学上相似的亚组来分析治疗效果。本研究是首次发表的前瞻性研究,通过细胞角蛋白标记富集肿瘤细胞,研究DNA倍体和s期分数对宫颈癌和子宫内膜癌预后的意义。在流式细胞术分析91例宫颈癌和73例子宫内膜癌样本的细胞周期之前,用fitc偶联细胞角蛋白抗体(CK 5、6、8和CK 17)对上皮细胞进行标记。在宫颈癌中,dna倍体和s期分数都不是相关的预后参数。但G(0)G(1)峰值的CV在宫颈癌细胞中显示预后相关性,甚至在多变量分析中也是如此。然而,由于CV的鉴别能力很小,这一有趣的观察结果似乎没有治疗效果。在子宫内膜癌中,总dna -非整倍体(dna -指数> 1.3)和高增殖细胞百分比(>75百分位数)是无复发生存的单因素和多因素高度显著的预后因素。特别是dna非整倍体(DI>1.3)是最重要的独立分子生物学预后因素之一。而诊断刮除,我们可以通过确定预后因素,如组织学肿瘤类型,分级,宫颈受累和dna倍体,甚至术前识别危险患者。因此,这些患者可以主要在肿瘤中心接受治疗。总之,我们的研究表明,子宫内膜癌应进行dna倍性检测。在宫颈癌中,dna参数的测定无临床意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信