NASA light-emitting diodes for the prevention of oral mucositis in pediatric bone marrow transplant patients.

Harry T Whelan, James F Connelly, Brian D Hodgson, Lori Barbeau, A Charles Post, George Bullard, Ellen V Buchmann, Mary Kane, Noel T Whelan, Ann Warwick, David Margolis
{"title":"NASA light-emitting diodes for the prevention of oral mucositis in pediatric bone marrow transplant patients.","authors":"Harry T Whelan,&nbsp;James F Connelly,&nbsp;Brian D Hodgson,&nbsp;Lori Barbeau,&nbsp;A Charles Post,&nbsp;George Bullard,&nbsp;Ellen V Buchmann,&nbsp;Mary Kane,&nbsp;Noel T Whelan,&nbsp;Ann Warwick,&nbsp;David Margolis","doi":"10.1089/104454702320901107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of prophylactic near-infrared light therapy from light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in pediatric bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients.</p><p><strong>Background data: </strong>Oral mucositis (OM) is a frequent side effect of chemotherapy that leads to increased morbidity. Near-infrared light has been shown to produce biostimulatory effects in tissues, and previous results using near-infrared lasers have shown improvement in OM indices. However, LEDs may hold greater potential for clinical applications.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We recruited 32 consecutive pediatric patients undergoing myeloablative therapy in preparation for BMT. Patients were examined by two of three pediatric dentists trained in assessing the Schubert oral mucositis index (OMI) for left and right buccal and lateral tongue mucosal surfaces, while the patients were asked to rate their current left and right mouth pain, left and right xerostomia, and throat pain. LED therapy consisted of daily treatment at a fluence of 4 J/cm(2) using a 670-nm LED array held to the left extraoral epithelium starting on the day of transplant, with a concurrent sham treatment on the right. Patients were assessed before BMT and every 2-3 days through posttransplant day 14. Outcomes included the percentage of patients with ulcerative oral mucositis (UOM) compared to historical epidemiological controls, the comparison of left and right buccal pain to throat pain, and the comparison between sides of the buccal and lateral tongue OMI and buccal pain.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The incidence of UOM was 53%, compared to an expected rate of 70-90%. There was also a 48% and 39% reduction of treated left and right buccal pain, respectively, compared to untreated throat pain at about posttransplant day 7 (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between sides in OMI or pain.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although more studies are needed, LED therapy appears useful in the prevention of OM in pediatric BMT patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":79503,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical laser medicine & surgery","volume":"20 6","pages":"319-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1089/104454702320901107","citationCount":"153","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical laser medicine & surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/104454702320901107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 153

Abstract

Objective: The purpose of this study was to determine the effects of prophylactic near-infrared light therapy from light-emitting diodes (LEDs) in pediatric bone marrow transplant (BMT) recipients.

Background data: Oral mucositis (OM) is a frequent side effect of chemotherapy that leads to increased morbidity. Near-infrared light has been shown to produce biostimulatory effects in tissues, and previous results using near-infrared lasers have shown improvement in OM indices. However, LEDs may hold greater potential for clinical applications.

Materials and methods: We recruited 32 consecutive pediatric patients undergoing myeloablative therapy in preparation for BMT. Patients were examined by two of three pediatric dentists trained in assessing the Schubert oral mucositis index (OMI) for left and right buccal and lateral tongue mucosal surfaces, while the patients were asked to rate their current left and right mouth pain, left and right xerostomia, and throat pain. LED therapy consisted of daily treatment at a fluence of 4 J/cm(2) using a 670-nm LED array held to the left extraoral epithelium starting on the day of transplant, with a concurrent sham treatment on the right. Patients were assessed before BMT and every 2-3 days through posttransplant day 14. Outcomes included the percentage of patients with ulcerative oral mucositis (UOM) compared to historical epidemiological controls, the comparison of left and right buccal pain to throat pain, and the comparison between sides of the buccal and lateral tongue OMI and buccal pain.

Results: The incidence of UOM was 53%, compared to an expected rate of 70-90%. There was also a 48% and 39% reduction of treated left and right buccal pain, respectively, compared to untreated throat pain at about posttransplant day 7 (p < 0.05). There were no significant differences between sides in OMI or pain.

Conclusion: Although more studies are needed, LED therapy appears useful in the prevention of OM in pediatric BMT patients.

NASA发光二极管预防小儿骨髓移植患者口腔黏膜炎。
目的:本研究的目的是确定发光二极管(led)预防性近红外光治疗在小儿骨髓移植(BMT)受者中的效果。背景资料:口腔黏膜炎(OM)是化疗的常见副作用,导致发病率增加。近红外光已被证明在组织中产生生物刺激效应,以前使用近红外激光的结果显示OM指数的改善。然而,led在临床应用方面可能具有更大的潜力。材料和方法:我们招募了32例连续接受骨髓清除治疗的儿科患者,为BMT做准备。患者由三名接受过舒伯特口腔黏膜炎指数(OMI)评估培训的儿科牙医中的两名进行检查,该指数是针对左右颊和侧舌粘膜表面进行的,同时要求患者对他们当前的左右口腔疼痛、左右口干症和喉咙疼痛进行评分。LED治疗包括每日4 J/cm(2)的剂量,从移植当天开始使用670 nm LED阵列固定在左侧口外上皮,同时在右侧进行假治疗。患者在BMT前和移植后第14天每2-3天进行一次评估。结果包括溃疡性口腔黏膜炎(UOM)患者与历史流行病学对照的百分比,左右颊痛与咽喉痛的比较,以及颊侧和侧舌侧OMI与颊痛的比较。结果:UOM的发生率为53%,高于预期的70-90%。移植后第7天左右,与未治疗的咽喉疼痛相比,治疗后的左颊疼痛和右颊疼痛分别减少48%和39% (p < 0.05)。两侧患者在OMI和疼痛方面无明显差异。结论:虽然需要更多的研究,但LED治疗在预防小儿BMT患者OM方面是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信