A new rapid radiological procedure for routine teratological use in bone ossification assessment: a supplement for staining methods.

Teratology Pub Date : 2002-12-01 DOI:10.1002/tera.10116
Franciszek Burdan, Ingrid Rozylo-Kalinowska, T Katarzyna Rozylo, Ibrahim Chahoud
{"title":"A new rapid radiological procedure for routine teratological use in bone ossification assessment: a supplement for staining methods.","authors":"Franciszek Burdan,&nbsp;Ingrid Rozylo-Kalinowska,&nbsp;T Katarzyna Rozylo,&nbsp;Ibrahim Chahoud","doi":"10.1002/tera.10116","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Presently, bone ossification is assessed by the study of single-stained fetal bones (alizarin red-S) or double-stained bones and cartilaginous structures (alcian blue followed by alizarin red-S). Both methods, especially double-staining, are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and provide qualitative information regarding skeleton ossification. Quantitative evaluation of ossification is more difficult and is usually based on determination of calcium and other minerals in the bone by means of atomic absorption spectrometry. Here we introduce a simple new method that allows quantitative determination of skeleton ossification before routine staining examination.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Fetuses delivered by laparotomy on the 16th and 21st day of gestation as well as 1-day-old rat pups were examined. The fetuses and pups were prenatally subcutaneously exposed to sodium valproate or to physiological saline. Lateral, prone, and supine digital radiograms of each fetus were taken using the Digora-Soredex digital radiography system and the Planmeca Intra intraoral X-ray machine. According to the best visualization, the data concerning vertebra were analyzed. All the fetuses were then routinely double-stained using alcian blue and alizarin red-S.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Malformations of axial skeleton (rib, sternum, and thoracic and sacral vertebra) were found in valproate-treated groups. Unlike cartilage malformations, the bone changes were detected in similar frequency in radiological and staining methods. Differences in densities according to the degree of ossification in the vertebral arches and bodies at different levels of the vertebral column, between drug-treated and negative control groups were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The preliminary results suggest that digital radiography examination is a useful method in determining delaying of skeleton ossification not detectable by other methods. It balances qualitative and quantitative aspects of the presently used methods and is also simple, objective, fast, and relatively inexpensive.</p>","PeriodicalId":22211,"journal":{"name":"Teratology","volume":"66 6","pages":"315-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/tera.10116","citationCount":"22","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teratology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/tera.10116","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 22

Abstract

Background: Presently, bone ossification is assessed by the study of single-stained fetal bones (alizarin red-S) or double-stained bones and cartilaginous structures (alcian blue followed by alizarin red-S). Both methods, especially double-staining, are labor-intensive, time-consuming, and provide qualitative information regarding skeleton ossification. Quantitative evaluation of ossification is more difficult and is usually based on determination of calcium and other minerals in the bone by means of atomic absorption spectrometry. Here we introduce a simple new method that allows quantitative determination of skeleton ossification before routine staining examination.

Methods: Fetuses delivered by laparotomy on the 16th and 21st day of gestation as well as 1-day-old rat pups were examined. The fetuses and pups were prenatally subcutaneously exposed to sodium valproate or to physiological saline. Lateral, prone, and supine digital radiograms of each fetus were taken using the Digora-Soredex digital radiography system and the Planmeca Intra intraoral X-ray machine. According to the best visualization, the data concerning vertebra were analyzed. All the fetuses were then routinely double-stained using alcian blue and alizarin red-S.

Results: Malformations of axial skeleton (rib, sternum, and thoracic and sacral vertebra) were found in valproate-treated groups. Unlike cartilage malformations, the bone changes were detected in similar frequency in radiological and staining methods. Differences in densities according to the degree of ossification in the vertebral arches and bodies at different levels of the vertebral column, between drug-treated and negative control groups were noted.

Conclusions: The preliminary results suggest that digital radiography examination is a useful method in determining delaying of skeleton ossification not detectable by other methods. It balances qualitative and quantitative aspects of the presently used methods and is also simple, objective, fast, and relatively inexpensive.

在骨化评估中用于常规畸形学的一种新的快速放射学程序:染色方法的补充。
背景:目前,骨骨化是通过研究单染色胎儿骨骼(茜素红-s)或双染色骨骼和软骨结构(茜素蓝和茜素红-s)来评估的。这两种方法,特别是双染色,都是劳动密集型的,耗时的,并提供关于骨骼骨化的定性信息。骨化的定量评价比较困难,通常是基于用原子吸收光谱法测定骨中的钙和其他矿物质。在这里,我们介绍了一种简单的新方法,可以在常规染色检查之前定量确定骨骼骨化。方法:对妊娠第16、21天剖腹分娩的胎鼠及1日龄大鼠仔鼠进行检查。胎儿和幼崽在出生前皮下暴露于丙戊酸钠或生理盐水。使用Digora-Soredex数字摄影系统和Planmeca Intra口内x线机拍摄每个胎儿的侧卧位、俯卧位和仰卧位数字x线片。根据最佳可视化,对椎体相关数据进行分析。然后,所有的胎儿都常规地用alcian blue和茜素红s进行双重染色。结果:丙戊酸治疗组中轴骨骼(肋骨、胸骨、胸骶椎)均出现畸形。与软骨畸形不同,骨变化在放射学和染色方法中检测到的频率相似。在药物治疗组和阴性对照组之间,根据不同水平椎弓和椎体的骨化程度,密度的差异被记录下来。结论:初步结果表明,数字x线检查是一种有效的方法,可用于确定其他方法无法检测到的骨骼骨化延迟。它平衡了目前使用的方法的定性和定量方面,而且简单、客观、快速,而且相对便宜。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信