Quality management practices in telehealth programs: a stakeholder accountability framework.

Proceedings. AMIA Symposium Pub Date : 2002-01-01
Kathryn H Dansky, Larry D Gamm
{"title":"Quality management practices in telehealth programs: a stakeholder accountability framework.","authors":"Kathryn H Dansky,&nbsp;Larry D Gamm","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Improved technologies, distances between providers and patients, and an emphasis on cost-containment have encouraged the use of telehealth as a method of service delivery. Despite the increased use of this technology, few studies have been conducted on management of telehealth programs. Research on quality management is essential for disseminating and generalizing information on best practices in telehealth programs. This study focused on quality management practices used in telehealth programs, using a Stakeholder Accountability Framework. We propose that different indicators of quality are employed to satisfy the expectations of different internal and external stakeholders. A national survey of telehealth programs (N=93) was conducted in January, 2001. Wide variations in practices were found, with the most notable differences between not-for-profit and proprietary programs. The dimensions illustrated in the Stakeholder Accountability Framework were supported empirically. Implications of differences are examined as they relate to advancing quality in telehealth.</p>","PeriodicalId":79712,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. AMIA Symposium","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2244224/pdf/procamiasymp00001-0231.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. AMIA Symposium","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Improved technologies, distances between providers and patients, and an emphasis on cost-containment have encouraged the use of telehealth as a method of service delivery. Despite the increased use of this technology, few studies have been conducted on management of telehealth programs. Research on quality management is essential for disseminating and generalizing information on best practices in telehealth programs. This study focused on quality management practices used in telehealth programs, using a Stakeholder Accountability Framework. We propose that different indicators of quality are employed to satisfy the expectations of different internal and external stakeholders. A national survey of telehealth programs (N=93) was conducted in January, 2001. Wide variations in practices were found, with the most notable differences between not-for-profit and proprietary programs. The dimensions illustrated in the Stakeholder Accountability Framework were supported empirically. Implications of differences are examined as they relate to advancing quality in telehealth.

远程医疗方案的质量管理实践:利益相关者问责框架。
技术的改进、提供者和患者之间的距离以及对成本控制的重视,鼓励使用远程保健作为提供服务的一种方法。尽管这项技术的使用越来越多,但很少有关于远程医疗项目管理的研究。质量管理研究对于传播和推广关于远程保健方案最佳做法的信息至关重要。本研究的重点是远程医疗项目中使用的质量管理实践,使用利益相关者问责框架。我们建议采用不同的质量指标来满足不同的内部和外部利益相关者的期望。2001年1月进行了一项全国远程医疗计划调查(N=93)。在实践中发现了广泛的差异,在非营利和专有程序之间存在最显著的差异。利益相关者问责框架中所示的维度得到了实证支持。检查差异的影响,因为它们与提高远程医疗质量有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信