A double-blind, randomized, controlled parallel group study evaluating the efficacy and safety of acemetacin for the management of osteoarthritis.

C T Chou, Y Y Tsai
{"title":"A double-blind, randomized, controlled parallel group study evaluating the efficacy and safety of acemetacin for the management of osteoarthritis.","authors":"C T Chou,&nbsp;Y Y Tsai","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a new form of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID), acematacin (Acemet), with indomethacin, in patients suffering from osteoarthritis (OA). Patients diagnosed with OA were included in a double-blind, randomized, controlled parallel group study A total of 42 patients were randomized to either acemetacin 60 mg t.i.d. or indomethacin 25 mg t.i.d. for 28 days. At an outpatient clinic, each patient was followed up regularly for efficacy, compliance and possible adverse events. Both drugs produced a statistically significant improvement for primary efficacy variables: change of pain score during motion and restriction of body movement. Values for overall tolerability and incidence of gastrointestinal side effects were significantly lower for acemetacin than for indomethacin. We therefore suggest that acemetacin, by demonstrating significant tolerability and safety advantages, is as effective as indomethacin for the treatment of OA.</p>","PeriodicalId":13940,"journal":{"name":"International journal of clinical pharmacology research","volume":"22 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of clinical pharmacology research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The aim of the present study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of a new form of nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID), acematacin (Acemet), with indomethacin, in patients suffering from osteoarthritis (OA). Patients diagnosed with OA were included in a double-blind, randomized, controlled parallel group study A total of 42 patients were randomized to either acemetacin 60 mg t.i.d. or indomethacin 25 mg t.i.d. for 28 days. At an outpatient clinic, each patient was followed up regularly for efficacy, compliance and possible adverse events. Both drugs produced a statistically significant improvement for primary efficacy variables: change of pain score during motion and restriction of body movement. Values for overall tolerability and incidence of gastrointestinal side effects were significantly lower for acemetacin than for indomethacin. We therefore suggest that acemetacin, by demonstrating significant tolerability and safety advantages, is as effective as indomethacin for the treatment of OA.

一项双盲、随机、对照平行组研究,评估阿西美辛治疗骨关节炎的疗效和安全性。
本研究的目的是比较一种新型非甾体抗炎药(NSAID)阿塞马他星(Acemet)与吲哚美辛对骨关节炎(OA)患者的疗效和耐受性。诊断为OA的患者被纳入一项双盲、随机、对照平行组研究,共有42名患者被随机分配到阿西美辛60mg t.d或吲哚美辛25mg t.d,持续28天。在门诊,定期随访每位患者的疗效、依从性和可能的不良事件。两种药物在主要疗效变量上均有统计学显著改善:运动时疼痛评分的改变和身体运动受限。阿西美辛的总体耐受性和胃肠道副作用发生率明显低于吲哚美辛。因此,我们认为阿西美辛具有显著的耐受性和安全性优势,与吲哚美辛治疗OA同样有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信