{"title":"Clinical acceptance of two multipurpose solutions: MPS containing HPMC versus citrate-based MPS without rubbing.","authors":"Michel Guillon, Cecile Maissa","doi":"10.1097/01.ICL.0000024120.30959.57","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study evaluated the clinical performance of contact lens wear, primarily comfort and dryness during the daytime and at the end of the day, associated with the use of a multipurpose solution containing hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), COMPLETE ComfortPLUS (Allergan, Irvine, CA) compared to a citrate-based multi-purpose disinfecting solution used without manual rubbing, NO RUB OPTI-FREE EXPRESS (Alcon, Ft. Worth, TX).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This randomized, investigator-masked, cross-over study was conducted with 64 subjects who underwent adaptation and were planned-replacement lens wearers. Each solution was used by the subject for 1 month, with a 1-week wash-out period during which the subject's own solutions were used. When new solutions were issued, new contact lenses also were dispensed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The level of comfort, the primary endpoint of the study, in the evening (on a 50-point scale) was rated better with OPTI-FREE EXPRESS at the end of the 1-month period of wear (mean 39 vs. 37, P=0.03). Dryness, the most frequently reported symptom, occurred at a similar level of rating with both care systems (P >0.05). Few other clinically significant differences between the regimens were noted.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The overall clinical performance of the citrate-based solution used without manual rubbing was similar to that of the solution containing HPMC. The subjective results of comfort-level and dryness with the two regimens demonstrated that the inclusion of HPMC did not provide unique performance advantages.</p>","PeriodicalId":22367,"journal":{"name":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","volume":"28 4","pages":"186-91"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"19","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The CLAO journal : official publication of the Contact Lens Association of Ophthalmologists, Inc","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/01.ICL.0000024120.30959.57","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 19
Abstract
Purpose: This study evaluated the clinical performance of contact lens wear, primarily comfort and dryness during the daytime and at the end of the day, associated with the use of a multipurpose solution containing hydroxypropyl methylcellulose (HPMC), COMPLETE ComfortPLUS (Allergan, Irvine, CA) compared to a citrate-based multi-purpose disinfecting solution used without manual rubbing, NO RUB OPTI-FREE EXPRESS (Alcon, Ft. Worth, TX).
Methods: This randomized, investigator-masked, cross-over study was conducted with 64 subjects who underwent adaptation and were planned-replacement lens wearers. Each solution was used by the subject for 1 month, with a 1-week wash-out period during which the subject's own solutions were used. When new solutions were issued, new contact lenses also were dispensed.
Results: The level of comfort, the primary endpoint of the study, in the evening (on a 50-point scale) was rated better with OPTI-FREE EXPRESS at the end of the 1-month period of wear (mean 39 vs. 37, P=0.03). Dryness, the most frequently reported symptom, occurred at a similar level of rating with both care systems (P >0.05). Few other clinically significant differences between the regimens were noted.
Conclusions: The overall clinical performance of the citrate-based solution used without manual rubbing was similar to that of the solution containing HPMC. The subjective results of comfort-level and dryness with the two regimens demonstrated that the inclusion of HPMC did not provide unique performance advantages.