A Nurse Practitioner Intervention Model to Maximize Efficient Use of Telemetry Resources

Peter A. Gross MD, Denise Patriaco RN, MSN, FNPC (Cardiology Nurse Practitioner), Kellie McGuire RN, MSN, FNPC (Cardiology Nurse Practitioner), Joan Skurnick PhD (Project Statistician), Louis Evan Teichholz MD
{"title":"A Nurse Practitioner Intervention Model to Maximize Efficient Use of Telemetry Resources","authors":"Peter A. Gross MD,&nbsp;Denise Patriaco RN, MSN, FNPC (Cardiology Nurse Practitioner),&nbsp;Kellie McGuire RN, MSN, FNPC (Cardiology Nurse Practitioner),&nbsp;Joan Skurnick PhD (Project Statistician),&nbsp;Louis Evan Teichholz MD","doi":"10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28060-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Telemetry monitoring is widely used in hospitals; the importance of being able to monitor and examine dysrhythmias has been universally accepted. Yet it is often used for patients who do not actually require this technology.</p><p>A model to improve the efficiency of telemetry use entailed the use of an advanced practice nurse (APN; identical to a nurse practitioner) to provide concurrent review and intervention of floating telemetry, which is available for patients independently of the floor location and who do not need an intensive care unit bed.</p></div><div><h3>Addressing overuse</h3><p>The demand for floating telemetry at Hackensack University Medical Center had equaled or exceeded the telemetry availability virtually 100% of the time, even after local guidelines had been disseminated in 1998. The APN carried out concurrent monitoring and intervened with the attending physician when patients were on telemetry for longer than 48<!--> <!-->hours and did not meet the local telemetry guidelines.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean number (standard error [SE]) of hours per patient declined from 65.2 ± 0.7<!--> <!-->hours (95% confidence interval, 63.8 to 66.6<!--> <!-->hours) for the 11 months before the intervention to a mean of 49.6 ± 0.4<!--> <!-->hours (95% confidence interval, 48.7 to 50.2<!--> <!-->hours) for the 29 months after intervention—representing a decrease of 34% (<em>p</em> &lt; 0.0001). This decrease led to an increase in the number of patients per month put on telemetry.</p></div><div><h3>Discussion</h3><p>The APN model, an aggressive approach that induced change almost immediately, was then applied to other quality improvement projects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79382,"journal":{"name":"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement","volume":"28 10","pages":"Pages 566-573"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28060-8","citationCount":"14","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1070324102280608","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

Abstract

Background

Telemetry monitoring is widely used in hospitals; the importance of being able to monitor and examine dysrhythmias has been universally accepted. Yet it is often used for patients who do not actually require this technology.

A model to improve the efficiency of telemetry use entailed the use of an advanced practice nurse (APN; identical to a nurse practitioner) to provide concurrent review and intervention of floating telemetry, which is available for patients independently of the floor location and who do not need an intensive care unit bed.

Addressing overuse

The demand for floating telemetry at Hackensack University Medical Center had equaled or exceeded the telemetry availability virtually 100% of the time, even after local guidelines had been disseminated in 1998. The APN carried out concurrent monitoring and intervened with the attending physician when patients were on telemetry for longer than 48 hours and did not meet the local telemetry guidelines.

Results

The mean number (standard error [SE]) of hours per patient declined from 65.2 ± 0.7 hours (95% confidence interval, 63.8 to 66.6 hours) for the 11 months before the intervention to a mean of 49.6 ± 0.4 hours (95% confidence interval, 48.7 to 50.2 hours) for the 29 months after intervention—representing a decrease of 34% (p < 0.0001). This decrease led to an increase in the number of patients per month put on telemetry.

Discussion

The APN model, an aggressive approach that induced change almost immediately, was then applied to other quality improvement projects.

最大限度地有效利用遥测资源的护士执业干预模型
遥测监测在医院应用广泛;能够监测和检查心律失常的重要性已被普遍接受。然而,它经常被用于那些实际上并不需要这项技术的病人。一个提高遥测使用效率的模型需要使用高级执业护士(APN;与执业护士相同)提供浮动遥测的同步检查和干预,这适用于独立于楼层位置且不需要重症监护病房床位的患者。解决过度使用问题哈肯萨克大学医学中心对浮动遥测的需求几乎在100%的时间内等于或超过遥测的可用性,即使在1998年发布了当地指导方针之后也是如此。当患者遥测时间超过48小时且不符合当地遥测指南时,APN与主治医生进行同步监测和干预。结果每位患者的平均小时数(标准误差[SE])从干预前11个月的65.2±0.7小时(95%可信区间,63.8 ~ 66.6小时)下降到干预后29个月的49.6±0.4小时(95%可信区间,48.7 ~ 50.2小时),下降了34% (p <0.0001)。这种减少导致每月接受遥测的患者数量增加。APN模型,一种几乎立即引起变化的积极方法,随后被应用到其他质量改进项目中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信