Comparison of T Cu 200 and Progestasert IUDs.

Contraceptive delivery systems Pub Date : 1983-04-01
P Lavin, C Bravo, C Waszak
{"title":"Comparison of T Cu 200 and Progestasert IUDs.","authors":"P Lavin,&nbsp;C Bravo,&nbsp;C Waszak","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Insertions of the T Cu 200 and the Progestasert IUDs in a total of 400 postpartum women were compared. Insertions were carried out within 10 minutes of delivery, either manually or with an inserter. There was a significant difference in the 6 and 12 month expulsion rates (P0.05) between the 2 groups, but no differences were found related to type of insertion. 12 month expulsion rates for the T Cu hand and inserter groups were 9.0 and 8.1, respectively, and 35.8 and 35.2 for the Progestasert hand and inserted groups, respectively. Overall, significantly fewer Progestasert users reported dysmenorrhea at follow-up and the specific 12 month dysmenorrhea rate was significantly lower for the Progestasert users than for the T Cu users. More women in the Progestasert groups reported intermenstrual spotting and bleeding, but specific 12 month rates of intermenstrual pain, spotting, and bleeding showed no differences between the groups.</p>","PeriodicalId":84493,"journal":{"name":"Contraceptive delivery systems","volume":"4 2","pages":"143-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1983-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contraceptive delivery systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Insertions of the T Cu 200 and the Progestasert IUDs in a total of 400 postpartum women were compared. Insertions were carried out within 10 minutes of delivery, either manually or with an inserter. There was a significant difference in the 6 and 12 month expulsion rates (P0.05) between the 2 groups, but no differences were found related to type of insertion. 12 month expulsion rates for the T Cu hand and inserter groups were 9.0 and 8.1, respectively, and 35.8 and 35.2 for the Progestasert hand and inserted groups, respectively. Overall, significantly fewer Progestasert users reported dysmenorrhea at follow-up and the specific 12 month dysmenorrhea rate was significantly lower for the Progestasert users than for the T Cu users. More women in the Progestasert groups reported intermenstrual spotting and bleeding, but specific 12 month rates of intermenstrual pain, spotting, and bleeding showed no differences between the groups.

tcu200与孕激素宫内节育器的比较。
比较400例产后妇女使用tcu200和孕激素宫内节育器的情况。在分娩10分钟内进行插入,无论是手动插入还是使用插入器插入。两组患者6个月和12个月的拔管率比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05),但不同插管方式间无统计学差异。T - Cu手组和插入组的12个月驱逐率分别为9.0和8.1,孕激素手组和插入组的12个月驱逐率分别为35.8和35.2。总的来说,在随访中,孕激素使用者报告痛经的人数明显减少,孕激素使用者的特定12个月痛经率明显低于T - Cu使用者。孕激素组中有更多的妇女报告经期出血和点滴出血,但具体12个月的经期疼痛、点滴和出血发生率在两组之间没有差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信