Information needs on emergency contraception not being met.

Family planning today Pub Date : 1993-01-01
{"title":"Information needs on emergency contraception not being met.","authors":"","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>During the 1980s, there was 2 prominent changes in family planning: more women went to general practitioners (GPs) for contraceptive advice and there was an upturn in the use of condoms due to safer sex campaigns in the mid-80s. In this study of 769 women requesting a pregnancy termination, the author's found that the greater use of condoms had appeared to increase the need for information about emergency contraception, but this was not being met. Patients advised by their GPs seemed to have a lower level of knowledge than those who obtained their contraception from clinics. The study, carried out at St. James's University Hospital in 1991-92, is compared with several studies in the 1970s and 80s which look at contraceptive usage by women with unwanted pregnancies. Differences were found between those receiving contraceptive advice from different sources (i.e. GPs, clinics, no medical source). Failure of the pill was more frequent in the GP-advised group, but failure of the diaphragm was more frequent in the clinic-advised group. Failure of non-use of condoms did not differ according to the source of advice. Knowledge of and use of emergency contraception was low. Only 14.5% of those using no contraception or recognizing a condom failure attempted to use a secondary or emergency method. Condoms should be used as well as rather than instead of other methods of contraception, and knowledge and availability of emergency contraception should be increased and promoted, recommend the authors. They concluded that problems arising from family planning provision by untrained and uncommitted doctors should be addressed urgently. (Bromham and Cartmill, British Journal of Family Planning, vol. 19, 1993, pp179-183). Commenting on the study findings, FPA Medical Information Office Jane Urwin said: \"This study has furthered our knowledge in this area. It also highlights the need for further study of risk-taking behavior in relation to contraceptive use's.</p>","PeriodicalId":84729,"journal":{"name":"Family planning today","volume":" ","pages":"3"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1993-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family planning today","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

During the 1980s, there was 2 prominent changes in family planning: more women went to general practitioners (GPs) for contraceptive advice and there was an upturn in the use of condoms due to safer sex campaigns in the mid-80s. In this study of 769 women requesting a pregnancy termination, the author's found that the greater use of condoms had appeared to increase the need for information about emergency contraception, but this was not being met. Patients advised by their GPs seemed to have a lower level of knowledge than those who obtained their contraception from clinics. The study, carried out at St. James's University Hospital in 1991-92, is compared with several studies in the 1970s and 80s which look at contraceptive usage by women with unwanted pregnancies. Differences were found between those receiving contraceptive advice from different sources (i.e. GPs, clinics, no medical source). Failure of the pill was more frequent in the GP-advised group, but failure of the diaphragm was more frequent in the clinic-advised group. Failure of non-use of condoms did not differ according to the source of advice. Knowledge of and use of emergency contraception was low. Only 14.5% of those using no contraception or recognizing a condom failure attempted to use a secondary or emergency method. Condoms should be used as well as rather than instead of other methods of contraception, and knowledge and availability of emergency contraception should be increased and promoted, recommend the authors. They concluded that problems arising from family planning provision by untrained and uncommitted doctors should be addressed urgently. (Bromham and Cartmill, British Journal of Family Planning, vol. 19, 1993, pp179-183). Commenting on the study findings, FPA Medical Information Office Jane Urwin said: "This study has furthered our knowledge in this area. It also highlights the need for further study of risk-taking behavior in relation to contraceptive use's.

关于紧急避孕的信息需求没有得到满足。
在20世纪80年代,计划生育方面有两个显著的变化:更多的妇女向全科医生(gp)寻求避孕建议;由于80年代中期的安全性行为运动,避孕套的使用有所上升。在对769名要求终止妊娠的妇女进行的研究中,提交人发现,更多地使用避孕套似乎增加了对紧急避孕信息的需求,但这一点没有得到满足。全科医生建议的患者似乎比那些从诊所获得避孕措施的患者知识水平低。这项研究于1991-92年在圣詹姆斯大学医院进行,并与20世纪70年代和80年代的几项研究进行了比较,这些研究关注的是意外怀孕妇女的避孕措施使用情况。从不同来源(即全科医生、诊所、无医疗来源)获得避孕建议的人之间存在差异。避孕药失败在gp建议组中更常见,但隔膜失败在临床建议组中更常见。不使用避孕套的失败并没有因咨询的来源而有所不同。对紧急避孕的了解和使用程度较低。在那些没有采取避孕措施或认识到避孕套失效的人中,只有14.5%的人试图使用第二种或紧急方法。这组作者建议,应该同时使用避孕套,而不是代替其他避孕方法,并且应该增加和推广紧急避孕的知识和可获得性。他们的结论是,应紧急解决由未经训练和不负责的医生提供计划生育服务所产生的问题。(Bromham和Cartmill,《英国计划生育杂志》1993年第19卷,第179-183页)。FPA医学信息办公室的Jane Urwin在评论研究结果时说:“这项研究进一步加深了我们在这一领域的知识。它还强调需要进一步研究与使用避孕药具有关的冒险行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书