The impacts of health, education, family planning and electrification programs on fertility, mortality and child schooling in East Java, Indonesia.

Majalah demografi Indonesia Pub Date : 1988-06-01
M D Wirakartakusumah
{"title":"The impacts of health, education, family planning and electrification programs on fertility, mortality and child schooling in East Java, Indonesia.","authors":"M D Wirakartakusumah","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>This paper examines the effects of public health, family planning, education, electrification, and water supply programs on fertility, child mortality, and school enrollment decisions of rural households in East Java, Indonesia. The theoretical model assumes that parents maximize a utility function, subject to 1) a budget constraint that equates income with expenditures on children (including schooling and health inputs), and 2) a production function that relates health inputs to child survival possibilities. Public programs affect prices of contraceptives, schooling and health inputs, and environmental conditions that in turn affect child survival. Data are taken from the 1980 East Java Population Survey, the Socio-economic Survey, and the Detailed Village Census. The final sample consists of 3170 rural households with married women of childbearing age. Ordinary least squares and logit regressions of recent fertility, child mortality, and school enrollment on program and household variables yielded the following findings. 1) The presence of maternal and child health clinics reduced fertility but not mortality. 2) The presence of public health centers strongly reduced mortality but not fertility. 3) The presence of contraceptive distribution centers had no effect on fertility. 4) School attendance rates were influenced positively by the availability of primary and secondary schools. 5) Health and family planning programs had no effects on schooling. 6) The availability of public latrines reduced fertility and mortality. 7) The water supply variable did not affect the dependent variables when ordinary least squares techniques were applied but had statistically significant impact when logit methods were used. 8) Electricity supply had little effect on the dependent variables. 9) The mother's schooling had a strong positive correlation with children's schooling but no effect on fertility or mortality. 10) Household expenditures were related positively to school attendance and negatively to mortality. 11) There was little or no interaction between household variables and presence of government programs. 12) Subprovincial area measures of service availability appeared more appropriate for public health and family planning services, while village-level measures appeared more appropriate for schooling.</p>","PeriodicalId":83789,"journal":{"name":"Majalah demografi Indonesia","volume":"15 29","pages":"37-73"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1988-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Majalah demografi Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines the effects of public health, family planning, education, electrification, and water supply programs on fertility, child mortality, and school enrollment decisions of rural households in East Java, Indonesia. The theoretical model assumes that parents maximize a utility function, subject to 1) a budget constraint that equates income with expenditures on children (including schooling and health inputs), and 2) a production function that relates health inputs to child survival possibilities. Public programs affect prices of contraceptives, schooling and health inputs, and environmental conditions that in turn affect child survival. Data are taken from the 1980 East Java Population Survey, the Socio-economic Survey, and the Detailed Village Census. The final sample consists of 3170 rural households with married women of childbearing age. Ordinary least squares and logit regressions of recent fertility, child mortality, and school enrollment on program and household variables yielded the following findings. 1) The presence of maternal and child health clinics reduced fertility but not mortality. 2) The presence of public health centers strongly reduced mortality but not fertility. 3) The presence of contraceptive distribution centers had no effect on fertility. 4) School attendance rates were influenced positively by the availability of primary and secondary schools. 5) Health and family planning programs had no effects on schooling. 6) The availability of public latrines reduced fertility and mortality. 7) The water supply variable did not affect the dependent variables when ordinary least squares techniques were applied but had statistically significant impact when logit methods were used. 8) Electricity supply had little effect on the dependent variables. 9) The mother's schooling had a strong positive correlation with children's schooling but no effect on fertility or mortality. 10) Household expenditures were related positively to school attendance and negatively to mortality. 11) There was little or no interaction between household variables and presence of government programs. 12) Subprovincial area measures of service availability appeared more appropriate for public health and family planning services, while village-level measures appeared more appropriate for schooling.

印度尼西亚东爪哇省卫生、教育、计划生育和电气化方案对生育率、死亡率和儿童教育的影响。
本文考察了公共卫生、计划生育、教育、电气化和供水项目对印度尼西亚东爪哇农村家庭生育率、儿童死亡率和入学决定的影响。该理论模型假定父母将效用函数最大化,但受制于1)将收入与用于儿童的支出(包括上学和保健投入)等同起来的预算约束,以及2)将保健投入与儿童生存可能性联系起来的生产函数。公共项目影响避孕药具的价格、学校教育和卫生投入,以及环境条件,而环境条件反过来又影响儿童的生存。数据来自1980年东爪哇人口调查、社会经济调查和详细的村庄人口普查。最终样本包括3170户有已婚育龄妇女的农村家庭。对近期生育率、儿童死亡率和学校入学率在项目和家庭变量上的普通最小二乘和logit回归得出了以下发现。1)妇幼保健诊所的存在降低了生育率,但没有降低死亡率。2)公共卫生中心的存在大大降低了死亡率,但没有降低生育率。(3)避孕药具配送中心的存在对生育率没有影响。4)小学和中学的可获得性对入学率有正向影响。5)健康和计划生育项目对学校教育没有影响。6)公共厕所的提供降低了生育率和死亡率。7)采用普通最小二乘方法时,供水变量对因变量没有影响,而采用logit方法时,供水变量对因变量的影响具有统计学意义。8)电力供应对因变量影响不大。9)母亲受教育程度与子女受教育程度呈正相关,但对生育率和死亡率无影响。10)家庭支出与出勤率呈正相关,与死亡率负相关。11)家庭变量和政府项目之间很少或没有相互作用。12)副省级地区的服务可得性指标似乎更适合于公共卫生和计划生育服务,而村一级的指标似乎更适合于学校教育。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信