Barrier contraception in the teenager: a comparison of four methods in adolescent girls.

J A Goldman, D Dicker, D Feldberg, N Samuel, R Resnik
{"title":"Barrier contraception in the teenager: a comparison of four methods in adolescent girls.","authors":"J A Goldman,&nbsp;D Dicker,&nbsp;D Feldberg,&nbsp;N Samuel,&nbsp;R Resnik","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The use-effectiveness and continuation rates of 4 methods of contraception were studied during a 2 year follow-up period in a group of 405 teenage girls. Results were compared in 2 groups of adolescents, 1 of highly motivated, high socioeconomic status girls (A) and 1 of poorly motivated, low socioeconomic status adolescent clinic patients (B). The method of contraception was selected by the girls, who were instructed in their proper use. Results showed good rates of continuation among girls of the 1st group as compared to those of the 2nd group. Pregnancy rates after 24 months of use, as calculated by Pearl's formula, was 3.6 and 5.4 respectively with the use of a condom, and 5.8 and 10.8 when the diaphragm was used. When using vaginal foam alone, the rates were 4.2 and 12.3 and with the rhythm method, 8.5 and 13.1. The foam-alone method was unpopular in both groups. No serious side effects or complications were recorded. The study demostrated a reasonable acceptability and use-effectiveness for barrier contraceptives. It is suggested that these harmless and complication-free methods, especially the condom and diaphragm, may be reasonable alternatives for the more modern methods in teens of all socioeconomic strata; an effort must be made to educate and instruct the poorly motivated and encourage them to present themselves for regular follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":85252,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric and adolescent gynecology : official journal of the International Federation of Infantile and Juvenile Gynecology","volume":"3 1","pages":"59-76"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1985-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric and adolescent gynecology : official journal of the International Federation of Infantile and Juvenile Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The use-effectiveness and continuation rates of 4 methods of contraception were studied during a 2 year follow-up period in a group of 405 teenage girls. Results were compared in 2 groups of adolescents, 1 of highly motivated, high socioeconomic status girls (A) and 1 of poorly motivated, low socioeconomic status adolescent clinic patients (B). The method of contraception was selected by the girls, who were instructed in their proper use. Results showed good rates of continuation among girls of the 1st group as compared to those of the 2nd group. Pregnancy rates after 24 months of use, as calculated by Pearl's formula, was 3.6 and 5.4 respectively with the use of a condom, and 5.8 and 10.8 when the diaphragm was used. When using vaginal foam alone, the rates were 4.2 and 12.3 and with the rhythm method, 8.5 and 13.1. The foam-alone method was unpopular in both groups. No serious side effects or complications were recorded. The study demostrated a reasonable acceptability and use-effectiveness for barrier contraceptives. It is suggested that these harmless and complication-free methods, especially the condom and diaphragm, may be reasonable alternatives for the more modern methods in teens of all socioeconomic strata; an effort must be made to educate and instruct the poorly motivated and encourage them to present themselves for regular follow-up.

青少年的屏障避孕:四种方法在少女中的比较。
在为期2年的随访期间,对405名少女进行了4种避孕方法的使用效果和延续率的研究。结果对两组青少年进行比较,1组为高社会经济地位的高动机女孩(A), 1组为低社会经济地位的低动机女孩(B)。避孕方法由女孩自行选择,并指导其正确使用。结果显示,与第二组相比,第一组女孩的延续率较高。根据珀尔的公式计算,使用24个月后,使用避孕套的怀孕率分别为3.6和5.4,使用隔膜的怀孕率分别为5.8和10.8。单独使用阴道泡沫时,其发生率分别为4.2和12.3;使用节律法时,其发生率分别为8.5和13.1。单独泡沫法在两组中都不受欢迎。无严重副作用或并发症记录。研究表明,屏障避孕具有合理的可接受性和使用有效性。建议这些无害且无并发症的方法,特别是避孕套和隔膜,可能是所有社会经济阶层青少年更现代方法的合理选择;必须努力教育和指导动机差的人,并鼓励他们出席定期的后续行动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书