{"title":"[Effect of extracorporeal shockwave therapy on vascular regulation. Infrared thermography in epicondylitis humeri radialis].","authors":"M Haake, T Willenberg, F Sauer, P Griss","doi":"10.1024/1023-9332.8.4.176","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is recommended as an alternative treatment for lateral epicondylitis (LE). An influence on the blood perfusion is considered to be one possible effect. Infrared thermography is used in this trial to measure effects of ESWT on the thermal regulation in the target area.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>33 patients with chronic LE were examined in a prospective, placebo-controlled single blind study with an independent observer. 3 x 2000 impulses of an energy flux density ED+ 0.22 mJ/mm2 were applied under local anaesthesia as verum-ESWT. Placebo-ESWT was performed under the same conditions. One elbow was treated, the other served as control. Before and after each shockwave application and after 12 weeks skin temperature was measured on both elbows at three predefined points by infrared thermography.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>While a significant decrease in the skin temperature was found on the treated and sham-treated sides opposed to the contralateral side, there was no difference between the real shockwave treatment and placebo therapy. Responder and Non-responder to the treatment could not be distinguished during the therapy.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Infrared thermography was proved to be a valuable additional technical instrument for diagnosis of LE, but is not an appropriate instrument to predict the clinical outcome in patients treated with ESWT. A noted reduction of skin temperature on the treated side is not due to specific effects of the shockwaves. It is unlikely that ESWT as applied has an influence on thermal regulation in the target area. These findings are supported by negative results of experimental and clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":79425,"journal":{"name":"Swiss surgery = Schweizer Chirurgie = Chirurgie suisse = Chirurgia svizzera","volume":"8 4","pages":"176-80"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss surgery = Schweizer Chirurgie = Chirurgie suisse = Chirurgia svizzera","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/1023-9332.8.4.176","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
Abstract
Background: Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) is recommended as an alternative treatment for lateral epicondylitis (LE). An influence on the blood perfusion is considered to be one possible effect. Infrared thermography is used in this trial to measure effects of ESWT on the thermal regulation in the target area.
Methods: 33 patients with chronic LE were examined in a prospective, placebo-controlled single blind study with an independent observer. 3 x 2000 impulses of an energy flux density ED+ 0.22 mJ/mm2 were applied under local anaesthesia as verum-ESWT. Placebo-ESWT was performed under the same conditions. One elbow was treated, the other served as control. Before and after each shockwave application and after 12 weeks skin temperature was measured on both elbows at three predefined points by infrared thermography.
Results: While a significant decrease in the skin temperature was found on the treated and sham-treated sides opposed to the contralateral side, there was no difference between the real shockwave treatment and placebo therapy. Responder and Non-responder to the treatment could not be distinguished during the therapy.
Discussion: Infrared thermography was proved to be a valuable additional technical instrument for diagnosis of LE, but is not an appropriate instrument to predict the clinical outcome in patients treated with ESWT. A noted reduction of skin temperature on the treated side is not due to specific effects of the shockwaves. It is unlikely that ESWT as applied has an influence on thermal regulation in the target area. These findings are supported by negative results of experimental and clinical trials.