A Rapid Interview Protocol Supporting Patient-Centered Quality Improvement: Hearing the Parent’s Voice in a Pediatric Cancer Unit

Elisa J. Sobo PhD (Research Scientist), Glenn Billman MD (Medical Safety Officer), Lillian Lim MPH (Health Educator), J. Wilken Murdock (Intern), Elvia Romero (Research Assistant), Donna Donoghue RN (Director), William Roberts MD (Medical Director), Paul S. Kurtin MD
{"title":"A Rapid Interview Protocol Supporting Patient-Centered Quality Improvement: Hearing the Parent’s Voice in a Pediatric Cancer Unit","authors":"Elisa J. Sobo PhD (Research Scientist),&nbsp;Glenn Billman MD (Medical Safety Officer),&nbsp;Lillian Lim MPH (Health Educator),&nbsp;J. Wilken Murdock (Intern),&nbsp;Elvia Romero (Research Assistant),&nbsp;Donna Donoghue RN (Director),&nbsp;William Roberts MD (Medical Director),&nbsp;Paul S. Kurtin MD","doi":"10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28055-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The Institute of Medicine’s 2001 report on quality delimits six dimensions of optimal care: safety, effectiveness, efficiency, timeliness, patient centeredness, and equity. In fall 2001 parents of pediatric cancer patients were interviewed to determine how well they thought these dimensions were addressed with respect to medication administration. Immediate goals were to identify system weaknesses and devise strategies to prevent future errors. A higherorder goal was to develop and demonstrate a model protocol for rapid-cycle interview assessments.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Hematology/oncology directors worked with a research expert to develop a semistructured interview protocol. After training, which included directed reading, oral instruction, and role-playing, a convenience sample of 20 English- and Spanish-speaking parents of inpatients was recruited. Parents were asked to characterize current medication administration practices and to describe problems that they had experienced or witnessed. Rapid content analysis techniques were used to identify issues of importance to the parents.</p></div><div><h3>Findings</h3><p>Parents’ medication concerns centered on their children’s comfort. Parents called for communication improvements, standardization of all nursing procedures and techniques, and a guide or an outline providing a clear understanding of what to expect when and from whom. Viewing these concerns in relation to the Institute of Medicine’s quality domains allowed the department to frame an improvement action plan aligned with organizational and national priorities.</p></div><div><h3>Implications</h3><p>With good supervision and limited focused training, inexperienced staff can successfully administer semistructured qualitative interviews and help analyze findings for rapid cycle improvement purposes. The protocol can be adapted for use in organizations interested in rapid qualitative assessments of patient and parent preferences.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":79382,"journal":{"name":"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement","volume":"28 9","pages":"Pages 498-509"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2002-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1070-3241(02)28055-4","citationCount":"23","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Joint Commission journal on quality improvement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1070324102280554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

Abstract

Background

The Institute of Medicine’s 2001 report on quality delimits six dimensions of optimal care: safety, effectiveness, efficiency, timeliness, patient centeredness, and equity. In fall 2001 parents of pediatric cancer patients were interviewed to determine how well they thought these dimensions were addressed with respect to medication administration. Immediate goals were to identify system weaknesses and devise strategies to prevent future errors. A higherorder goal was to develop and demonstrate a model protocol for rapid-cycle interview assessments.

Methods

Hematology/oncology directors worked with a research expert to develop a semistructured interview protocol. After training, which included directed reading, oral instruction, and role-playing, a convenience sample of 20 English- and Spanish-speaking parents of inpatients was recruited. Parents were asked to characterize current medication administration practices and to describe problems that they had experienced or witnessed. Rapid content analysis techniques were used to identify issues of importance to the parents.

Findings

Parents’ medication concerns centered on their children’s comfort. Parents called for communication improvements, standardization of all nursing procedures and techniques, and a guide or an outline providing a clear understanding of what to expect when and from whom. Viewing these concerns in relation to the Institute of Medicine’s quality domains allowed the department to frame an improvement action plan aligned with organizational and national priorities.

Implications

With good supervision and limited focused training, inexperienced staff can successfully administer semistructured qualitative interviews and help analyze findings for rapid cycle improvement purposes. The protocol can be adapted for use in organizations interested in rapid qualitative assessments of patient and parent preferences.

支持以患者为中心的质量改进的快速访谈协议:在儿科癌症病房听到父母的声音
医学研究所2001年关于质量的报告划分了最佳护理的六个维度:安全性、有效性、效率、及时性、以患者为中心和公平性。2001年秋天,我们采访了儿童癌症患者的父母,以确定他们认为这些方面在药物管理方面得到了怎样的解决。当前的目标是确定系统的弱点并制定策略以防止未来的错误。一个更高层次的目标是为快速循环面谈评估开发和演示一个模型协议。方法血液学/肿瘤学主任与研究专家合作制定半结构化访谈协议。训练包括引导阅读、口头指导和角色扮演,在训练之后,研究人员招募了20名讲英语和西班牙语的住院病人父母作为方便样本。家长被要求描述当前的药物管理实践,并描述他们所经历或目睹的问题。使用快速内容分析技术来识别对家长重要的问题。父母对药物治疗的关注主要集中在孩子的舒适度上。家长们呼吁改善沟通,使所有护理程序和技术标准化,并制定一份指南或大纲,清楚地了解在什么时候和从谁那里得到什么。将这些问题与医学研究所的质量领域联系起来,使该部门能够制定符合组织和国家优先事项的改进行动计划。通过良好的监督和有限的重点培训,没有经验的员工可以成功地管理半结构化定性访谈,并帮助分析结果,以实现快速循环改进的目的。该方案可适用于对患者和家长偏好的快速定性评估感兴趣的组织。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信