Beyond marital status: relationship type and duration and the risk of low birth weight.

Family planning perspectives Pub Date : 2000-11-01
S T Bird, A Chandra, T Bennett, S M Harvey
{"title":"Beyond marital status: relationship type and duration and the risk of low birth weight.","authors":"S T Bird,&nbsp;A Chandra,&nbsp;T Bennett,&nbsp;S M Harvey","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>Unmarried women have higher rates of low birth weight than married women. However, assumptions that unmarried women are uniformly at a disadvantage may be unfounded. A woman's relationship characteristics may be more relevant for infant health than her formal marital status.</p><p><strong>Methodology: </strong>Data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth were used to analyze associations between relationship characteristics and low birth weight among U.S. women aged 15-44 with a recent singleton live birth. Unadjusted odds ratios were generated to indicate the crude effects of independent variables, including relationship type and relationship duration at the time of conception. Multiple logistic regressions were performed to assess the impact of relationship variables on the likelihood of low birth weight, taking into account the effects of other covariates.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In multivariate models of all women and non-Hispanic black women, relationship type and duration were not associated with low birth weight. However, low birth weight was almost six times as likely among Hispanic women in nonmarital, noncohabiting relationships as among those who were married. Surprisingly, among non-Hispanic white women, low birth weight was less likely among those in nonmarital, noncohabiting relationships than among those who were married. Unexpected associations also were found among low birth weight, race and ethnicity, and relationship duration: Low birth weight was more likely among non-Hispanic white women in relationships of from five to 10 years in length than among those in relationships of longer than 10 years and less likely among Hispanic women in relationships of one year or less than among those in a relationship for more than 10 years.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Although unmarried women in the United States have higher rates of low birth weight than married women, many unmarried women are at no greater risk of low birth weight than their married counterparts. The findings confirm the need to consider the characteristics of relationships when examining the association of mother's \"union status\" and birth outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":75844,"journal":{"name":"Family planning perspectives","volume":"32 6","pages":"281-7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Family planning perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Context: Unmarried women have higher rates of low birth weight than married women. However, assumptions that unmarried women are uniformly at a disadvantage may be unfounded. A woman's relationship characteristics may be more relevant for infant health than her formal marital status.

Methodology: Data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth were used to analyze associations between relationship characteristics and low birth weight among U.S. women aged 15-44 with a recent singleton live birth. Unadjusted odds ratios were generated to indicate the crude effects of independent variables, including relationship type and relationship duration at the time of conception. Multiple logistic regressions were performed to assess the impact of relationship variables on the likelihood of low birth weight, taking into account the effects of other covariates.

Results: In multivariate models of all women and non-Hispanic black women, relationship type and duration were not associated with low birth weight. However, low birth weight was almost six times as likely among Hispanic women in nonmarital, noncohabiting relationships as among those who were married. Surprisingly, among non-Hispanic white women, low birth weight was less likely among those in nonmarital, noncohabiting relationships than among those who were married. Unexpected associations also were found among low birth weight, race and ethnicity, and relationship duration: Low birth weight was more likely among non-Hispanic white women in relationships of from five to 10 years in length than among those in relationships of longer than 10 years and less likely among Hispanic women in relationships of one year or less than among those in a relationship for more than 10 years.

Conclusion: Although unmarried women in the United States have higher rates of low birth weight than married women, many unmarried women are at no greater risk of low birth weight than their married counterparts. The findings confirm the need to consider the characteristics of relationships when examining the association of mother's "union status" and birth outcomes.

除了婚姻状况:关系类型和持续时间以及低出生体重的风险。
背景:未婚妇女的低出生体重率高于已婚妇女。然而,未婚女性普遍处于不利地位的假设可能是没有根据的。女性的关系特征可能比她的正式婚姻状况与婴儿健康更相关。方法:采用1995年全国家庭成长调查的数据,分析美国15-44岁近期单胎活产女性的关系特征与低出生体重之间的关系。产生未经调整的比值比,以表明自变量的粗略影响,包括关系类型和关系在受孕时的持续时间。采用多重逻辑回归来评估关系变量对低出生体重可能性的影响,同时考虑到其他协变量的影响。结果:在所有女性和非西班牙裔黑人女性的多变量模型中,关系类型和持续时间与低出生体重无关。然而,在非婚、非同居关系中的西班牙裔女性中,低出生体重的可能性几乎是已婚女性的六倍。令人惊讶的是,在非西班牙裔白人女性中,非婚、非同居关系的女性比已婚女性更不可能出现低出生体重。在低出生体重、种族和民族以及关系持续时间之间也发现了意想不到的关联:在5到10年的关系中,非西班牙裔白人女性比在超过10年的关系中更容易出现低出生体重,而在一年或更短的关系中,西班牙裔女性比在超过10年的关系中更容易出现低出生体重。结论:尽管美国未婚女性的低出生体重率高于已婚女性,但许多未婚女性的低出生体重风险并不比已婚女性高。研究结果证实,在研究母亲的“婚姻状态”和生育结果之间的关系时,有必要考虑关系的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信