Cortical activation related to arm-movement combinations.

M J McKeown
{"title":"Cortical activation related to arm-movement combinations.","authors":"M J McKeown","doi":"10.1002/1097-4598(2000)999:9<::aid-mus5>3.0.co;2-l","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Recent studies support the long-standing hypothesis that continuous arm movements consist of overlapping, discrete submovements. However, the cortical activation associated with these submovements is unclear. We tested the hypothesis that electroencephalography (EEG) activity would more strongly correspond to the particular combinations of muscle electrical activity, the independent components (ICs) of surface electromyography (EMG), than the surface EMG from individual muscles alone. We examined data recorded from two normal subjects performing sustained submaximal contractions or continual, unpaced repetitive movements of the arm. Independent component analysis (ICA) was used to determine the ICs of the multichannel EMG recordings (EMGICs). ICA was also used to calculate the coupling between the simultaneously recorded EEG and the EMG from a single muscle (Subject 1) or the EMGICs (Subject 2). The EMGICs were either tonic or phasic. The significant couplings between the EEG and the EMGICs were different for each EMGIC. The distribution on the scalp of the coupling between the EEG and tonic EMGICs and those of the single-muscle EMG were similar and followed topographic patterns in sensorimotor regions. Couplings between the EEG and phasic EMGICs were bifrontal, lateral, and bioccipital and were significantly stronger than the coupling between a single muscle's EMG and the EEG (p < 2 x 10(-5)) or another EMG combination derived from principal component analysis. These preliminary results support the notion that electrophysiological cortical activations are more significantly related to the ICs of muscle activations than to the activations of individual muscles alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":79355,"journal":{"name":"Muscle & nerve. Supplement","volume":"9 ","pages":"S19-25"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1002/1097-4598(2000)999:9<::aid-mus5>3.0.co;2-l","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muscle & nerve. Supplement","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/1097-4598(2000)999:9<::aid-mus5>3.0.co;2-l","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Recent studies support the long-standing hypothesis that continuous arm movements consist of overlapping, discrete submovements. However, the cortical activation associated with these submovements is unclear. We tested the hypothesis that electroencephalography (EEG) activity would more strongly correspond to the particular combinations of muscle electrical activity, the independent components (ICs) of surface electromyography (EMG), than the surface EMG from individual muscles alone. We examined data recorded from two normal subjects performing sustained submaximal contractions or continual, unpaced repetitive movements of the arm. Independent component analysis (ICA) was used to determine the ICs of the multichannel EMG recordings (EMGICs). ICA was also used to calculate the coupling between the simultaneously recorded EEG and the EMG from a single muscle (Subject 1) or the EMGICs (Subject 2). The EMGICs were either tonic or phasic. The significant couplings between the EEG and the EMGICs were different for each EMGIC. The distribution on the scalp of the coupling between the EEG and tonic EMGICs and those of the single-muscle EMG were similar and followed topographic patterns in sensorimotor regions. Couplings between the EEG and phasic EMGICs were bifrontal, lateral, and bioccipital and were significantly stronger than the coupling between a single muscle's EMG and the EEG (p < 2 x 10(-5)) or another EMG combination derived from principal component analysis. These preliminary results support the notion that electrophysiological cortical activations are more significantly related to the ICs of muscle activations than to the activations of individual muscles alone.

与手臂运动组合有关的皮质激活。
最近的研究支持了长期存在的假设,即连续的手臂运动由重叠的、离散的子运动组成。然而,与这些亚运动相关的皮层激活尚不清楚。我们测试了这样一个假设,即脑电图(EEG)活动更强烈地对应于肌肉电活动的特定组合,即表面肌电图(EMG)的独立成分(ic),而不是单独来自单个肌肉的表面肌电图。我们检查了两名正常受试者进行持续的次最大收缩或连续的无节奏重复手臂运动的数据记录。采用独立分量分析(ICA)确定多通道肌电记录(emgic)的ic。ICA还用于计算同时记录的脑电图与单个肌肉肌电图(受试者1)或肌电图(受试者2)之间的耦合。肌电图可以是强直的,也可以是相位的。脑电图和EMGIC之间的显著耦合对于每个EMGIC都是不同的。脑电图与强直性肌电图耦合在头皮上的分布与单肌肌电图的分布相似,并遵循感觉运动区地形模式。脑电图和相肌电图之间的耦合是双额、侧位和生物枕部的,明显强于单个肌肉肌电图和脑电图之间的耦合(p < 2 × 10(-5))或主成分分析得出的其他肌电图组合。这些初步结果支持这样一种观点,即电生理皮层激活与肌肉激活的ic比单独的单个肌肉激活更显着相关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信