Effectiveness of pseudoephedrine plus acetaminophen for treatment of symptoms attributed to the paranasal sinuses associated with the common cold.

S J Sperber, R B Turner, J V Sorrentino, R R O'Connor, J Rogers, J M Gwaltney
{"title":"Effectiveness of pseudoephedrine plus acetaminophen for treatment of symptoms attributed to the paranasal sinuses associated with the common cold.","authors":"S J Sperber,&nbsp;R B Turner,&nbsp;J V Sorrentino,&nbsp;R R O'Connor,&nbsp;J Rogers,&nbsp;J M Gwaltney","doi":"10.1001/archfami.9.10.979","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Little data exist on the cause and treatment of subfacial pain and pressure and other discomfort attributed to the paranasal sinuses that develop early during the course of the common cold. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of the combination of pseudoephedrine hydrochloride with acetaminophen for the treatment of early symptoms during colds, which are attributed by the patient to the sinuses.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Four hundred thirty subjects (216, pseudoephedrine and acetaminophen recipients; 214, placebo recipients) with cold symptoms of 48 hours or less who reported overall \"sinus\" symptoms of at least moderate severity were enrolled in this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled 2-dose study. Self-reported symptoms were scored (0 to 4, absent to severe) before and at 2 hours after the first and second doses. The 2 primary were measured 2 hours after the second dose were the overall sinus symptom assessment and a weighted composite assessment of sinus pressure, pain, and congestion (sinus symptoms).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with baseline, 2 hours after the second dose, the mean +/- SEM overall sinus symptom assessment score had decreased by 1.30 +/- 0. 06 in the pseudoephedrine and acetaminophen-treated subjects compared with 0.93 +/- 0.06 in the placebo-treated subjects (P< or = .029). The mean +/- SEM weighted average of sinus symptoms 2 hours after the second dose of study medication had decreased by 1.14 +/- 0.06 in the pseudoephedrine and acetaminophen-treated subjects compared with 0.84 +/- 0.06 in the placebo-treated subjects (P< or = .029). Reductions in similar magnitude were also observed for each of the individual sinus symptoms, and headache and rhinorrhea. Nervousness occurred in 4% of the pseudoephedrine and acetaminophen recipients compared with 0% of placebo recipients (P =.007).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our results suggest that pseudoephedrine plus acetaminophen is effective for relief of symptoms attributable to the paranasal sinuses that may develop early in the course of a cold. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:979-985</p>","PeriodicalId":8295,"journal":{"name":"Archives of family medicine","volume":"9 10","pages":"979-85"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"25","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.9.10.979","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 25

Abstract

Background: Little data exist on the cause and treatment of subfacial pain and pressure and other discomfort attributed to the paranasal sinuses that develop early during the course of the common cold. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of the combination of pseudoephedrine hydrochloride with acetaminophen for the treatment of early symptoms during colds, which are attributed by the patient to the sinuses.

Methods: Four hundred thirty subjects (216, pseudoephedrine and acetaminophen recipients; 214, placebo recipients) with cold symptoms of 48 hours or less who reported overall "sinus" symptoms of at least moderate severity were enrolled in this randomized double-blind placebo-controlled 2-dose study. Self-reported symptoms were scored (0 to 4, absent to severe) before and at 2 hours after the first and second doses. The 2 primary were measured 2 hours after the second dose were the overall sinus symptom assessment and a weighted composite assessment of sinus pressure, pain, and congestion (sinus symptoms).

Results: Compared with baseline, 2 hours after the second dose, the mean +/- SEM overall sinus symptom assessment score had decreased by 1.30 +/- 0. 06 in the pseudoephedrine and acetaminophen-treated subjects compared with 0.93 +/- 0.06 in the placebo-treated subjects (P< or = .029). The mean +/- SEM weighted average of sinus symptoms 2 hours after the second dose of study medication had decreased by 1.14 +/- 0.06 in the pseudoephedrine and acetaminophen-treated subjects compared with 0.84 +/- 0.06 in the placebo-treated subjects (P< or = .029). Reductions in similar magnitude were also observed for each of the individual sinus symptoms, and headache and rhinorrhea. Nervousness occurred in 4% of the pseudoephedrine and acetaminophen recipients compared with 0% of placebo recipients (P =.007).

Conclusion: Our results suggest that pseudoephedrine plus acetaminophen is effective for relief of symptoms attributable to the paranasal sinuses that may develop early in the course of a cold. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:979-985

伪麻黄碱加对乙酰氨基酚治疗与普通感冒相关的鼻窦症状的有效性。
背景:关于在普通感冒过程中早期出现的由副鼻窦引起的面下疼痛和压力以及其他不适的原因和治疗的资料很少。本研究的目的是确定盐酸伪麻黄碱与对乙酰氨基酚联合治疗感冒早期症状的疗效,这些症状由患者归因于鼻窦。方法:430例受试者(216例,伪麻黄碱和对乙酰氨基酚受体;214例(安慰剂接受者)感冒症状持续48小时或更短,报告总体“鼻窦”症状至少中度严重的患者被纳入这项随机双盲安慰剂对照双剂量研究。在第一次和第二次给药前和给药后2小时对自我报告的症状进行评分(0到4分,无症状到严重)。在第二次给药后2小时测量的2项主要指标是总体鼻窦症状评估和鼻窦压力、疼痛和充血(鼻窦症状)的加权综合评估。结果:与基线相比,第二次给药后2小时,平均+/- SEM整体鼻窦症状评估评分下降1.30 +/- 0。伪麻黄碱和对乙酰氨基酚组为0.93 +/- 0.06,安慰剂组为0.93 +/- 0.06 (P<或= 0.029)。在第二次给药后2小时,伪麻黄碱和对乙酰氨基酚组鼻窦症状的平均+/- SEM加权平均值下降了1.14 +/- 0.06,而安慰剂组的平均值为0.84 +/- 0.06 (P< or = 0.029)。在每个单独的鼻窦症状,头痛和鼻漏中也观察到类似程度的减少。接受伪麻黄碱和对乙酰氨基酚治疗的患者中有4%出现神经过敏,而接受安慰剂治疗的患者中这一比例为0% (P =.007)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,伪麻黄碱加对乙酰氨基酚对缓解感冒早期可能出现的鼻窦症状有效。中华医学杂志。2000;9:979-985
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信