Can depression treatment in primary care reduce disability? A stepped care approach.

E H Lin, M VonKorff, J Russo, W Katon, G E Simon, J Unützer, T Bush, E Walker, E Ludman
{"title":"Can depression treatment in primary care reduce disability? A stepped care approach.","authors":"E H Lin,&nbsp;M VonKorff,&nbsp;J Russo,&nbsp;W Katon,&nbsp;G E Simon,&nbsp;J Unützer,&nbsp;T Bush,&nbsp;E Walker,&nbsp;E Ludman","doi":"10.1001/archfami.9.10.1052","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess effects of stepped collaborative care depression intervention on disability.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Randomized controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Four primary care clinics of a large health maintenance organization.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Two hundred twenty-eight patients with either 4 or more persistent major depressive symptoms or a score of 1.5 or greater on the Hopkins Symptom Checklist. Depression items were randomized to stepped care intervention or usual care 6 to 8 weeks after initiating antidepressant medication.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Augmented treatment of persistently depressed patients by an on-site psychiatrist collaborating with primary care physicians. Treatment included patient education, adjustment of pharmacotherapy, and proactive monitoring of outcomes.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-month assessments of the Sheehan Disability Scale and the social function and role limitation subscales of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Patients who received the depression intervention experienced less interference in their family, work, and social activities than patients receiving usual primary care (Sheehan Disability Scale, z = 2.23; P =.025). Patients receiving intervention also reported a trend toward more improvement in SF-36-defined social functioning than patients receiving usual care (z = 1.63, P =.10), but there was no significant difference in role performance (z = 0.07, P =.94).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Significant disability accompanied depression in this persistently depressed group. The stepped care intervention resulted in small to moderate functional improvements for these primary care patients. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1052-1058</p>","PeriodicalId":8295,"journal":{"name":"Archives of family medicine","volume":"9 10","pages":"1052-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"120","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1052","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 120

Abstract

Objective: To assess effects of stepped collaborative care depression intervention on disability.

Design: Randomized controlled trial.

Setting: Four primary care clinics of a large health maintenance organization.

Patients: Two hundred twenty-eight patients with either 4 or more persistent major depressive symptoms or a score of 1.5 or greater on the Hopkins Symptom Checklist. Depression items were randomized to stepped care intervention or usual care 6 to 8 weeks after initiating antidepressant medication.

Intervention: Augmented treatment of persistently depressed patients by an on-site psychiatrist collaborating with primary care physicians. Treatment included patient education, adjustment of pharmacotherapy, and proactive monitoring of outcomes.

Main outcome measures: Baseline, 1-, 3-, and 6-month assessments of the Sheehan Disability Scale and the social function and role limitation subscales of the Medical Outcomes Study 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36).

Results: Patients who received the depression intervention experienced less interference in their family, work, and social activities than patients receiving usual primary care (Sheehan Disability Scale, z = 2.23; P =.025). Patients receiving intervention also reported a trend toward more improvement in SF-36-defined social functioning than patients receiving usual care (z = 1.63, P =.10), but there was no significant difference in role performance (z = 0.07, P =.94).

Conclusions: Significant disability accompanied depression in this persistently depressed group. The stepped care intervention resulted in small to moderate functional improvements for these primary care patients. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1052-1058

初级保健中的抑郁症治疗能减少残疾吗?阶梯式护理方法。
目的:评价阶梯式协同护理对残疾抑郁症的干预效果。设计:随机对照试验。环境:一家大型保健机构的四个初级保健诊所。患者:228例患者有4个或以上持续性重度抑郁症状,或在霍普金斯症状检查表中得分为1.5或更高。抑郁症患者在开始抗抑郁药物治疗后6至8周随机分为阶梯护理干预组或常规护理组。干预:由现场精神科医生与初级保健医生合作,加强对持续抑郁症患者的治疗。治疗包括患者教育、调整药物治疗和积极监测结果。主要结果测量:基线、1个月、3个月和6个月的Sheehan残疾量表评估,以及医学结果研究36项简短健康调查(SF-36)的社会功能和角色限制子量表评估。结果:接受抑郁症干预的患者在家庭、工作和社会活动中受到的干扰比接受常规初级保健的患者少(Sheehan残疾量表,z = 2.23;P = .025)。与接受常规护理的患者相比,接受干预的患者在sf -36定义的社会功能方面也有更多改善的趋势(z = 1.63, P = 0.10),但在角色表现方面没有显著差异(z = 0.07, P = 0.94)。结论:在这个持续抑郁的组中有显著的残疾伴抑郁。阶梯式护理干预对这些初级保健患者的功能有小到中度的改善。中华医学杂志。2000;9:1052-1058
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信