Profile of users of real-time interactive teleconference clinical consultations.

S Gustke, D C Balch, L O Rogers, V L West
{"title":"Profile of users of real-time interactive teleconference clinical consultations.","authors":"S Gustke,&nbsp;D C Balch,&nbsp;L O Rogers,&nbsp;V L West","doi":"10.1001/archfami.9.10.1036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Real-time interactive teleconference clinical consultations are envisioned for increasing accessibility to medical care by patients whose demographics restrict care. There are no published studies, however, describing referrals and the referring practitioners, patients, and specialists participating in these consultations.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To assess characteristics of participants of interactive teleconference clinical consultations.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive study, February 1, 1996, through April 30, 1999.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Eastern North Carolina: Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University and 7 rural hospitals and clinics in its telemedicine network.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Rural practitioners requesting consultations (n = 76), consulting physicians (n = 40), and patients completing evaluations following consultations (n = 495).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Demographic and descriptive variables for referring providers, patients, and consulting physicians relative to the population in the region and to patients and physicians at the East Carolina University School of Medicine clinics.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The largest number of referrals (65.2%) were made to obtain a second opinion or recommend a management plan in dermatology (33.5%), allergy (21.0%), or cardiology (17.8%). Significant patient characteristics were race (56.8% minorities), age (19.6% < or = 10 years old and 26.0% > or = 59.0 years old), sex (59% females), and insurance status (10.7% no insurance, 33.7% Medicaid, 15.4% Medicare). In addition, 38.0% had household incomes below the poverty level. Only 5.2% of the patients would have been treated by the referral practitioner, making travel necessary for consultation. Demographic characteristics of the practitioners were not statistically different.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants of interactive teleconference clinical consultations are patients whose access to medical care might otherwise be limited. Use of telemedicine by practitioners is not related to age or sex. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1036-1040</p>","PeriodicalId":8295,"journal":{"name":"Archives of family medicine","volume":"9 10","pages":"1036-40"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of family medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/archfami.9.10.1036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

Abstract

Background: Real-time interactive teleconference clinical consultations are envisioned for increasing accessibility to medical care by patients whose demographics restrict care. There are no published studies, however, describing referrals and the referring practitioners, patients, and specialists participating in these consultations.

Objective: To assess characteristics of participants of interactive teleconference clinical consultations.

Design: Descriptive study, February 1, 1996, through April 30, 1999.

Setting: Eastern North Carolina: Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University and 7 rural hospitals and clinics in its telemedicine network.

Subjects: Rural practitioners requesting consultations (n = 76), consulting physicians (n = 40), and patients completing evaluations following consultations (n = 495).

Main outcome measures: Demographic and descriptive variables for referring providers, patients, and consulting physicians relative to the population in the region and to patients and physicians at the East Carolina University School of Medicine clinics.

Results: The largest number of referrals (65.2%) were made to obtain a second opinion or recommend a management plan in dermatology (33.5%), allergy (21.0%), or cardiology (17.8%). Significant patient characteristics were race (56.8% minorities), age (19.6% < or = 10 years old and 26.0% > or = 59.0 years old), sex (59% females), and insurance status (10.7% no insurance, 33.7% Medicaid, 15.4% Medicare). In addition, 38.0% had household incomes below the poverty level. Only 5.2% of the patients would have been treated by the referral practitioner, making travel necessary for consultation. Demographic characteristics of the practitioners were not statistically different.

Conclusions: Participants of interactive teleconference clinical consultations are patients whose access to medical care might otherwise be limited. Use of telemedicine by practitioners is not related to age or sex. Arch Fam Med. 2000;9:1036-1040

实时互动式电话会议临床咨询的用户概况。
背景:实时互动式远程会议临床会诊被设想为增加人口统计学限制护理的患者获得医疗护理的可及性。没有发表的研究,然而,描述转诊和转诊从业人员,患者和专家参与这些咨询。目的:评价交互式远程会议临床会诊参与者的特点。设计:描述性研究,1996年2月1日至1999年4月30日。地点:北卡罗莱纳东部:东卡罗莱纳大学布罗迪医学院及其远程医疗网络中的7家农村医院和诊所。研究对象:要求咨询的农村从业人员(n = 76)、咨询医师(n = 40)和在咨询后完成评估的患者(n = 495)。主要结果测量:与该地区人口和东卡罗莱纳大学医学院诊所的患者和医生相关的转诊提供者、患者和咨询医生的人口统计学和描述性变量。结果:在皮肤科(33.5%)、过敏科(21.0%)和心脏病科(17.8%)获得第二意见或推荐治疗方案的转诊人数最多(65.2%)。重要的患者特征是种族(56.8%为少数民族)、年龄(19.6% <或= 10岁,26.0% >或= 59.0岁)、性别(59%为女性)和保险状况(10.7%无保险,33.7%为医疗补助,15.4%为医疗保险)。此外,38.0%的家庭收入低于贫困水平。只有5.2%的患者会得到转诊医生的治疗,这使得他们需要旅行去咨询。从业人员的人口学特征无统计学差异。结论:交互式远程会议临床会诊的参与者是获得医疗保健的机会可能受到限制的患者。从业人员使用远程医疗与年龄或性别无关。中华医学杂志。2000;9:1036-1040
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信